Yet another string question.

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
User avatar
congerz83
Intermediate Member
Posts: 750
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 5:14 am

Yet another string question.

Post by congerz83 »

Hey guys, need some help here. I have a 4001C64S with the D'Addario chromes on in. My 4003 has GHS precision flatwounds. I like the GHS flats better. Can i put these on my 4001. I am terrified of the "bridge lift." Help please.
LET THE WORLD KNOW YOU WANT PAUL TO BRING BACK THE 4001. JOIN OUR FACEBOOK GROUP!! http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=147641915268984
User avatar
beatlefreak
Senior Member
Posts: 6160
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:45 am
Contact:

Post by beatlefreak »

Flatwounds generally have lower tension than roundwounds of the same gauge. You should be alright.
Ka is a wheel.
scottpro1969
Intermediate Member
Posts: 687
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2003 9:19 am

Post by scottpro1969 »

Refer to answers in the Bass section regarding this topic. Kris, unless you're talking about TI flats, in my experience flats are higher tension than rounds...in most cases.
scottpro1969
Intermediate Member
Posts: 687
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2003 9:19 am

Post by scottpro1969 »

Richard, I've tried many flatwound sets and have found that Thomastik Infeld would probably be the best choice if you're concerned about bridge lift, etc. I personally like the higher tension as they're not floppy to me because I'm an aggressive player. If you have a light touch, TI's are awesome, they sound great, just not for me.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37512
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Post by jps »

"Flatwounds generally have lower tension than roundwounds of the same gauge"

I have normally found the reverse to be true.
User avatar
beatlefreak
Senior Member
Posts: 6160
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:45 am
Contact:

Post by beatlefreak »

Rickenbacker markets the 4003 as being made for roundwounds, while saying that the 4001 is better for flatwounds. Why? Because the improved neck reinforcement on the 4003 can take higher tension roundwound strings most bassists want these days.
Ka is a wheel.
rickfan63
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 896
Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2002 8:30 am

Post by rickfan63 »

As far as tension goes, I've found the Chromes to be very easy on the neck of my C64 and V63. GHS and Rotos I thought had more pull. Having used all three, I like the D'Addario Chromes far better than GHS or Rotosound flats IMHO.
I recently went back to playing a Rickenbacker bass. Its like meeting an old friend again
beatle_bry
New member
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 2:20 pm
Contact:

Re: Yet another string question.

Post by beatle_bry »

I'll preface this by saying I'm the Canadian distributor for Pyramid Strings. I used to use the chromes too, I prefer Pyramids, better response, and balance. I started dealing Pyramids in Canada after I got tired of struggling to get them here.

When you change string brands, do yourself a favor, and listen to all that "hubbub" about a proper setup. Let your guitar sit for a couple of days, after tuning it to pitch and give the strings time to stretch, and settle. Come back to it in 2, or 3 days, and do the following: Truss, Nut, Bridge, Intonation - In that order!

Regarding tail lift: I've setup a lot of Ric basses, and monitored my own closely. I've seen lift coming with new factory setups, and lift with swapped out strings to other brands that didn't better, or worsen lift any. If you have tail lift on your Ric bass beyond a credit card, consider shimming it with a pair of washers on the front if it bothers you. If your unsure of how stable the tail on your Ric is, the first indication is if the guitar is not holding pitch.

Ric makes the best bass on the market - A legend. If you're lucky enough to play one, enjoy it. :wink:
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”