Original Azureglo or not?
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
Original Azureglo or not?
Here are pics from a friend's '81 AZ 4001. He is suspicious of the finish so I made some photographs for your perusal. The pic of the chip on the headstock does show the finish as being quite thick; is this correct for this finish? Notice no visible markings in the cavities as all of it is painted. Whaddya think? 
Re: Original Azureglo or not?
The rest.
Re: Original Azureglo or not?
Okay, my guess. Refinished, and nitro over the blue. There is also conductive gray paint in some of the cavities.
Re: Original Azureglo or not?
If that is a refin, the shade is exactly like mine. I'll take the pickguard and TRC off tomorrow if I have time. I think it's real though. Mine also has blue on the aluminum block like that, just has a lot more.
Re: Original Azureglo or not?
Jeff, what is that nut made of? Alu?
Re: Original Azureglo or not?
Looks original to me. Just wondering why he thinks its a refin???
You gunning for this one Jeff??
You gunning for this one Jeff??
"Knowledge is Power"
- sloop_john_b
- Rick-a-holic
- Posts: 13843
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am
Re: Original Azureglo or not?
Dunno if it is or it isn't, but I absolutely love the finish on this one!
Re: Original Azureglo or not?
If it's original, why wasn't the writing masked before it was sprayed? And it looks too thick where that chip is.
Still, a nice shade of AZ.
Still, a nice shade of AZ.
Re: Original Azureglo or not?
The color looks pretty accurate to what was done at that time, but I suspect it's been re-finished.
What I'd do is to try some scraping in some inconspicuous areas that don't show, ala the control cavity or truss rod cavity.
I'll add that the finish looks like it's been on the guitar a while. Of course if it was Mapleglo to begin with you won't find anything......
What I'd do is to try some scraping in some inconspicuous areas that don't show, ala the control cavity or truss rod cavity.
I'll add that the finish looks like it's been on the guitar a while. Of course if it was Mapleglo to begin with you won't find anything......
Re: Original Azureglo or not?
It looks to me like a refin, and not a terribly good one either as to the surfacing detail afterwards. That bass seems to have had some rough handling over the years subsequent to the refin. Apologies to Scott, but that's my gut on this one.jps wrote:Here are pics from a friend's '81 AZ 4001. He is suspicious of the finish so I made some photographs for your perusal. The pic of the chip on the headstock does show the finish as being quite thick; is this correct for this finish? Notice no visible markings in the cavities as all of it is painted. Whaddya think?
Re: Original Azureglo or not?
You guys know better than me.....I've never even seen a real Azure-glo 4001. 
"Knowledge is Power"
-
rickaddict
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6163
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am
Re: Original Azureglo or not?
My vote is that it's original. AZ is a thick finish. So are JG, White and a few others. They chip the same way.
If it was re-finned, it was done in a color very close to factory, the materials and methods were very close to factory, and it was done shortly after the bass was made.
What I wanna know is...What happened to the little rubber mat/gasket thingies that the tuners rest on?
Let's ask Paul W. about the finish!
Paul?
If it was re-finned, it was done in a color very close to factory, the materials and methods were very close to factory, and it was done shortly after the bass was made.
What I wanna know is...What happened to the little rubber mat/gasket thingies that the tuners rest on?
Let's ask Paul W. about the finish!
Paul?
-
rickaddict
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6163
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am
Re: Original Azureglo or not?
Look at the close-ups of the open screw holes. If it were a re-fin, wouldn't there be some blue in there?
All of those holes look like they were drilled after the finish was applied.
All of those holes look like they were drilled after the finish was applied.
