How does the 360 sound compare to the 660?

Vintage, Modern, V & C Series, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
User avatar
320capt
Member
Posts: 384
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 4:06 am

How does the 360 sound compare to the 660?

Post by 320capt »

Howdy all,

I know, a stupid question because the 360's are semi-hollow body with hi-gain pickups and the 660's are a solid body with single coil type pickups.

However, from someone out there who maybe has both, I am wondering what the sound difference is like. I currently own a 360/6 JG, have never run across a 660 series guitar in the flesh and only have a limited amount of play time with a 360/12. I have played a little with a 620 which has the same body as a 660 but with the narrow/standard neck and hi-gain pickups (right)?

I think I would like the wider neck of 660/12 but I am only familiar with the 360/12 sound.

When I am listening to some of the songs on my Tom Petty CD's I am hearing the 660/12 sound? I know the famous classic opening cord on the Beatles "Hard Days Night" is from a 360/12.

Is there a big/noticeable difference in sound between the 360/12 and 660/12?
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37503
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: How does the 360 sound compare to the 660?

Post by jps »

320capt wrote:...the 360's are semi-hollow body with hi-gain pickups and the 660's are a solid body with single coil type pickups.
The hi-gains are also single coil pickups.
User avatar
320capt
Member
Posts: 384
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 4:06 am

Re: How does the 360 sound compare to the 660?

Post by 320capt »

See, it just goes to show you how much I don't know...but I'm learning fast with the help of ya'all! :mrgreen:

Just what is the difference then of the 660 "vintage toaster top" pickups as listed on the RIC site and 360 hi-gain pups?

Just the covers? It seems I ran across some info about output/wiring/freq settings ect
User avatar
tennis_nick
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1476
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 9:56 am

Re: How does the 360 sound compare to the 660?

Post by tennis_nick »

output, magnet type and covers.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37503
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: How does the 360 sound compare to the 660?

Post by jps »

Besides the obvious cosmetics, toasters have six individual magnets all lined up next to each other giving a nice balance to all the strings, and because of it's design it is also suitable for basses including the 5, 6 and 8 string models RIC has produced in the past with the exception of the short lived 4004/5Cii bass; those used HB-1 pickups. Hi-gain pickups have a ceramic bar magnet under it with 4, 5 or 6 polepieces that sit under the strings. As to windings, the early '50s-'70s and the current scatterwound toasters were wound to around 6-8K Ohms; the '80s-'90s (I think there is some overlap in the late '70s to early '80s) toasters were wound much hotter, more like hi-gain pickups.
User avatar
sharkboy
Member
Posts: 477
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 9:20 pm

Re: How does the 360 sound compare to the 660?

Post by sharkboy »

The two types are different animals but entirely Rickenbacker.

This topic comes up fairly often, so a search or a good browse will find a number of results.

Here's my view:

I have a 370/6 (3-pickup version of the 360/6) and a 660/6 (among others, and I have similar 12-strings for comparison)

Advantages of the 370:

High gains are a little higher output and a little fuller sounding
probably the most comfortable body style of any electric I have ever played
rick-o-sound (I really like using a stereo sound)

Advantages of the 660:

Wider fretboard- easier for me to play
slightly thinner sounding pickups a little bit more jangly and can cut through a band at lower volume

When I get to play guitar live, my first choice is the 660 for the wider fretboard. It mostly just gives me a little more confidence. I can always get a good sound with it and it never lets me down in any way. In the studio, if it is an easy part I would normally go with the 370, unless the sound I needed required specifically that of the 660.
jcreasy
Member
Posts: 423
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 4:20 am

Re: How does the 360 sound compare to the 660?

Post by jcreasy »

My two cents... I've played 360s almost exclusively. (Mine are early 90s models). I thought the 660 neck was uncomfortable and too wide. Also, my 360s have scatterwound toasters, so my sound is different.
shamustwin
Senior Member
Posts: 5287
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 5:00 am

Re: How does the 360 sound compare to the 660?

Post by shamustwin »

A lot of variables involved, but I've a/b'd my '66 360/12 and 660/12.
My 360/12 has a more "woody" tone, whereas the 660/12 has a more metalic tone. Not great differences, but enough to choose one over the other, depending on the sound I want on a recording.

I find the neck on the '66 360/12 easier to play than a new-ish 3 series, but that could be a matter of the set-up.
jcreasy
Member
Posts: 423
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 4:20 am

Re: How does the 360 sound compare to the 660?

Post by jcreasy »

How I wish I had a '66 360 12 to a/b. For what it is worth, I stay in the middle position on my 360s with toasters and roll that elusive 5th knob to add the amout of warmth I want. That way, I can go from very thin, to very "... woody" as has been previously described.

JKC
shamustwin
Senior Member
Posts: 5287
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 5:00 am

Re: How does the 360 sound compare to the 660?

Post by shamustwin »

My perfect Rick mod: One volume, one blend.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: by John Simmons”