Why did Ric call it the 4003?

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

rickfan60
Senior Member
Posts: 5395
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:00 am

Re: Why did Ric call it the 4003?

Post by rickfan60 »

I should add that JH was correcting me on a statement I made based on information in the Smith book. My selection of words was perhaps not the best so he offererd up better choices. :) That should explain the apparent non-sequitrs in the quote.

Anyway, that is why there are 4001s with post '80 SNs. I say '80 because there are 4003s from '80. That was probably the transition year. JH did not remember for sure when I asked him so it could have been '81.
blueflamerick
Advanced Member
Posts: 1943
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 1:43 pm
Contact:

Re: Why did Ric call it the 4003?

Post by blueflamerick »

If you read all of those catalogs from the 80's, it seems that the 4001 was being marketed for use with flatwound strings, while the 4003 was marketed for use with roundwound strings.
rickfan60
Senior Member
Posts: 5395
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:00 am

Re: Why did Ric call it the 4003?

Post by rickfan60 »

I think they were mostly trying to clear out the remaining 4001s but yes they were pushing the 4003 as a bass that could "take" round wounds. Now, did the first 4003s come with factory rounds or were they still only selling flats at the time? My memory is a bit foggy about that but I seem to remember the first Rick rounds to surface closer to '85. Anyone?
ricnbacker
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 532
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2002 5:00 am

Re: Why did Ric call it the 4003?

Post by ricnbacker »

Forget numbers it should be know as "the Rickenbacker bass" 4001/4003 who cares. It is A Rci bass that in itself sets it apart.

Maybe Just Ric 1 or Ric 2

If 666 stands for evil then maybe it should have numberd 999, the oposite of Evil...pure Heaven! :D
jwr2

Re: Why did Ric call it the 4003?

Post by jwr2 »

According to numbers in scripture 6 is the number for imperfection and 3 is for complete ... so 666 is complete imperfection ...

Source Number in Scripture EW Bullinger :wink:
jwr2

Re: Why did Ric call it the 4003?

Post by jwr2 »

rickfan60 wrote:Both models appeared in the catalog for several years. JH had this to say a few years ago:

Perhaps the only detail that's not immediately apparent to you is that up
until at least the mid 1980's there was always an enormous inventory,
awaiting sale. Goods arriving from the factory were inspected prior to going
into the warehouse; many were sent back for additional adjustment or rework
and sometimes those were waylaid, even for a few years. Sometimes they were
remanufactured completely, even being stripped, then assigned new serial
numbers in assembly. (They are never, EVER, reassigned today, as a matter of
control for things such as work in process.)

All of these instruments were flushed out of the system in the mid 1980's,
and as the world changed the factory was retooled to be somewhat more
"just-in-time" to eliminate a large, expensive warehouse where instruments
had time to be damaged or needed adjustment due to age.

The operative phrase in your incorrect statement is "sold". Goods are sold
after they are received in the warehouse, whether the old mega-warehouse or
the modern mostly empty one, long after the serial number was affixed in
assembly
AAHHH I long for the good old days ... when there was an abundance of instruments in the warehouse ... now days there is a backlog :shock:

It is much more profitable for Ric to have a backlog than have a warehouse full of instruments ... This is a better business model for them ... but for us it makes Rics harder to find and more expensive. :(
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Re: Why did Ric call it the 4003?

Post by rickaddict »

I think part of that back log at RIC might have something to do with today's guitar collecting mentality. Among forumites, I wonder what our average Rick count is? And I wonder what the average Rick count was back when RIC had a warehouse full of instruments. I think there's a whole lot more guitars in circulation than there were 35 years ago.
jwr2

Re: Why did Ric call it the 4003?

Post by jwr2 »

Ya ... for many years I got by with 1 Ric bass ... now I have 6 ... 8)
User avatar
heinpete
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1730
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 10:08 pm

Re: Why did Ric call it the 4003?

Post by heinpete »

:D I'm also happy only playing one Rick at a time. So, I only wait for my 4001 coming back from Paul W. after successful "surgery" (pre-'73 conversion), then I probably will sell my second Rick, a 2004 4004CiiTR. Jeff R. do you still look for such model? :wink:
jwr2

Re: Why did Ric call it the 4003?

Post by jwr2 »

Yes I have one 4003, one 4003s5, one 4004L, one 4004ci, one 2022, and one 2030 ... I am thinking about a 4004cii trans red. preferably with the walnut wings ... I am not sure that I want to pay to ship one from europe though ...
rickfan60
Senior Member
Posts: 5395
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:00 am

Re: Why did Ric call it the 4003?

Post by rickfan60 »

I started with one but always managed to have 2 or 3 around the house. It was not really a collection back then. At least not in sense it is now.
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: Why did Ric call it the 4003?

Post by aceonbass »

Jeff, I shipped a bass to Germany a couple weeks ago USPS Priority Mail and it was only $125.00. It was oversize, and could not go Global Priority, which meant it couldn't be insured for over $500.00.
User avatar
heinpete
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1730
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 10:08 pm

Re: Why did Ric call it the 4003?

Post by heinpete »

jwr2 wrote: ... I am thinking about a 4004cii trans red. preferably with the walnut wings ...
...that is exactly what I have, look here: (Hardware changed to Chrome, recently all knobs original RIC)
Attachments
You see walnut wings!
You see walnut wings!
However it was already VVTied
However it was already VVTied
User avatar
ram
Senior Member
Posts: 3743
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 2:55 pm

Re: Why did Ric call it the 4003?

Post by ram »

Damn Dane, I get nervous just shipping across the country… overseas- definitely chutzpah and bravery!! My hat is off to you.

Peter nice Trans Red!…. Some day I too…. Some day…

Maybe they called it a 4003 cause 4002 was already taken?? :lol: :lol:
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”