New Toasters

General Rickenbacker discussion

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
1OUfan
Junior Member
Posts: 173
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 4:55 pm

New Toasters

Post by 1OUfan »

As you can probably tell, I'm a "newbie" and I have alot of questions. What is the difference between the newer "Toasters" and the ones on the vintage Rics from say the 1960's?
Thanks--
Bob
User avatar
Scastles
Senior Member
Posts: 3278
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 11:19 am
Contact:

Re: New Toasters

Post by Scastles »

The ohms. The vintage toasters are scatterwounds with 7.4 ohms, approx. I think the hotter toasters found on some models, like the V series for example, are around 12.
User avatar
lennon211
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1228
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 5:13 am

Re: New Toasters

Post by lennon211 »

1OUfan wrote:As you can probably tell, I'm a "newbie" and I have alot of questions. What is the difference between the newer "Toasters" and the ones on the vintage Rics from say the 1960's?
Thanks--
Bob
The newer toasters, the ones on guitars built since mid-'99 are rated at the same 7.4k resistance and are scatter-wound like the old ones from the '60's. From the mid-80's through '99, 12k toasters were used that were not scatter wound. Basically the easiest way to tell the difference is that the hot (12k) toasters have Phillips head screws in the corners and the vintage spec toasters use slot-head screws in the corners.
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: New Toasters

Post by johnallg »

The ones from the 60s were wound from the 5k range to the almost 6k+ range. Also the length of the magnet pole pieces were shorter. Also, and this is a guess as I believe alnico5 was not around back in the 60s, the material in the magnets were different - alnico3?? Anyone? Bueller?
User avatar
soundmasterg
RRF Consultant
Posts: 1923
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2002 1:06 pm

Re: New Toasters

Post by soundmasterg »

Alnico 5 has been around a long time. Almost all alnico speaker designs have historically used it, so how far does that go back? Certainly to the early 50's anyway. I would hazard a guess that Rickenbacker, like Gibson and Fender and others didn't spec out the exact magnet type, only that it had to be a certain dimension and to be a magnet. You'll find with PAF's that they had A2, A3, A4, and A5 and all sound different. Moreover the magnet can be fully charged or degaussed and that changes the sound too. A degaussed A5 has some similarities to the other, but there isn't much of a way to tell it is A5 without having the metal analyzed chemically aside from fully charging it and seing how high it goes as A5 goes higher than most others. I like A3 in bridge humbuckers a lot, and suspect I would like it in a RIC toaster in the bridge too, but haven't tried it yet.

Greg
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker General: by Howard Bishop”