Faker???
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
- rickengeezer
- Junior Member
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 5:00 am
Re: Faker???
I thought exactly the same thing when I saw it, even checked here and was surprised nobody had commented on it yet. The pictures are pretty useless; for all I know it's a bolt-on!
- bassduke49
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6580
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am
Re: Faker???
Yeah, the finish certainly doesn't look right, but I don't see any other clues. Usually the fakers are bound types with shark-fin position markers. Maybe this is just a bad refin? I'd like to see pix of the jackplate (it could be replaced though), routing inside, type of truss nuts, etc.
-
rickaddict
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6163
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am
Re: Faker???
My vote is...possible re-fin, possible swapped tuner ferrules...but nonetheless, a real Rickenbacker set-neck 4001S.
- jingle_jangle
- RRF Moderator
- Posts: 22679
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
- Contact:
Re: Faker???
[img]Definite[/img] refinish. Compare the shading pattern with any other genuine Rick FG bass from the era. Two things: The narrow band of consistent shading around the perimeter (genuine would have a wider band that varies in darkness) and especially the headstock, which has a thin band of shading all around instead of the horizontal bands we commonly see on factory refins.
Wish we had a photo of the back...
Wish we had a photo of the back...
-
rickaddict
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6163
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am
Re: Faker???
Agreed!
The "FG" on the headstock doesn't look like any RIC FG I've ever seen.
The "FG" on the headstock doesn't look like any RIC FG I've ever seen.
- kennyhowes
- Veteran RRF member
- Posts: 5022
- Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2001 1:03 am
- Contact:
Re: Faker???
If it's a neck-through, then I have a crush on it.
-
rickaddict
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6163
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am
Re: Faker???
Negative, Kenny. Note skunk stripe on headstock and not on body.
I too, have a crush on the (neck through) 4003S!
I too, have a crush on the (neck through) 4003S!
- kennyhowes
- Veteran RRF member
- Posts: 5022
- Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2001 1:03 am
- Contact:
Re: Faker???
Ah well.rickaddict wrote:Negative, Kenny. Note skunk stripe on headstock and not on body.
I too, have a crush on the (neck through) 4003S!
- revolver323
- Intermediate Member
- Posts: 997
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 5:48 am
- Contact:
Re: Faker???
I too don't trust the finish. I asked the owner about the missing pickup cover. He says he has it and it is "a rare low profile." Anyone ever heard of that? I lovethe dot neck, but I'd hate to get it to find out it's not a real Rick.
- jingle_jangle
- RRF Moderator
- Posts: 22679
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
- Contact:
Re: Faker???
Best thing to ask for at this point is a photo of the control cavity. It should show signs of a refin, and if it's not completely obscuring stuff, there should be some bare wood showing where masking tape was removed and hopefully some typical Rick factory graffiti. We should also be able to see the shape of the route. If we could get him to remove the guard, what's revealed could eliminate all doubt either way.
- revolver323
- Intermediate Member
- Posts: 997
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 5:48 am
- Contact:
Re: Faker???
He IS offering 7 days, money back.
Re: Faker???
It looks like the real thing with a really funky finish. The neck has the characteristic skew of the set-neck models and all of the other bits look legit from here.
