Shadow v. Blackstar

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
libratune
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 4255
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2002 9:06 am
Contact:

Re: Shadow v. Blackstar

Post by libratune »

Jake, thanks for the reply. I went through that September 2007 thread and came away puzzled as to the various sentiments about the Shadow v. Blackstar. For two basses that have as their main difference only the black fretboard v.the CB, there is quite a divergence of opinion on which is more desirable.

Here's a few quotes from that thread:

“I don't think the Shadow will ever have the same status of other collectables like the Annie, Blackstar, Squire even though there are supposed to be less made.”

“Whatever the price or rarity, these are IMHO the best looking Ric basses ever. Absolutely stunning.” [Shadow owner.]

“After all it's the JH [John Hall?] signature model. It was his weapon of choice as I recall.”

“I'm still surprised that their value isn't more [$2800 in Fall 2007] considering only 50-60 units were produced!” [Potential Shadow owner.]

“I like the Blackstars a lot better.”

And "none more black?" That would seem to be the Blackstar (no CB + black board) not the Shadow.

Go figure. In any event, if it has 4 strings, Paint It Black. And put black strings on it. :D
jakeox
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1123
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 7:40 am
Contact:

Re: Shadow v. Blackstar

Post by jakeox »

Yeah, although I think they're both so rare that a lot of people don't know about both of them, or can't really tell them apart. I think they're both super cool, I just happen to like binding a little more.

Also, besides the fingerboard, the Shadow actually has blacker trim than the Blackstar -- neck pickup bezel, bridge pickup cover, and maybe a few other details are black on the Shadow and chrome on the Blackstar. You know, since it wasn't confusing enough already.
User avatar
rikk
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1414
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 3:04 pm

Re: Shadow v. Blackstar

Post by rikk »

bassduke49 wrote:The Shadow is more like a 4003 with the bound body and neck(?) and stereo output (right?), while the Blackstar (and the Tuxedo and Redneck) are 4003S models (SPC officially) and are mono with no binding. In case you haven't seen them, here are all three SPC models together; Ted Staberow's collection:
Paul or Ted, if you have a slightly higher res of this, I'd love get one to use this as my desktop background.
Stunning shot.
User avatar
bassduke49
Senior Member
Posts: 6580
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am

Re: Shadow v. Blackstar

Post by bassduke49 »

Rick, I'd like to comply, but I really must retain all high-res versions of my photos for use in the book I'm working on. If everyone had access to BIG versions of the shots I've taken, it might limit the appeal of the book. Hope you understand.
rickfan60
Senior Member
Posts: 5395
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:00 am

Re: Shadow v. Blackstar

Post by rickfan60 »

rikk wrote:
bassduke49 wrote:The Shadow is more like a 4003 with the bound body and neck(?) and stereo output (right?), while the Blackstar (and the Tuxedo and Redneck) are 4003S models (SPC officially) and are mono with no binding. In case you haven't seen them, here are all three SPC models together; Ted Staberow's collection:
Paul or Ted, if you have a slightly higher res of this, I'd love get one to use this as my desktop background.
Stunning shot.

Paul took that picture at the Milwaukee Confluence. I agree it is a great one. I bought the Blackstar back in '92 for about $600 which seemed like a lot at the time. It came with a cert and all of the case stuff. The Tux came next about 3 years ago as an Ebay purchase. It also has a cert but is not quite as clean as the Blackstar. The Redneck was an indirect Ebay purchase. Marc Seligman bagged it and sold it to me a few weeks later. It is spot on perfect. Not a mark on it. The only thing missing is that new-Rick smell.
User avatar
berth
RRF Consultant
Posts: 1723
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 7:06 am
Contact:

Re: Shadow v. Blackstar

Post by berth »

bassduke49 wrote:Rick, I'd like to comply, but I really must retain all high-res versions of my photos for use in the book I'm working on. If everyone had access to BIG versions of the shots I've taken, it might limit the appeal of the book. Hope you understand.
For me high res images would work like an apetizer for the book. ;-)
User avatar
rikk
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1414
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 3:04 pm

Re: Shadow v. Blackstar

Post by rikk »

bassduke49 wrote:Rick, I'd like to comply, but I really must retain all high-res versions of my photos for use in the book I'm working on. If everyone had access to BIG versions of the shots I've taken, it might limit the appeal of the book. Hope you understand.

Paul, I respect your view. I'm going to buy your book no matter what.
User avatar
drkatherine1
New member
Posts: 35
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 7:24 pm

Re: Shadow v. Blackstar

Post by drkatherine1 »

I didn't know what to title this photo.......... "Shadow Bookends" (How decadent) or "Who let the White One In? The prices on the basses have been in flux for the past year. One big reason is that they rarely trade hands and as time goes on they become more desirable. I paid far more than my significant other for my Shadow. I paid close to $3000.00 for it. I took some good natured teasing for paying over $4000.00 for the Tux but that was extenuating circumstances.......birthday present for the significant other. I play guitar.........if you can call it that and I just started playing bass. I have fun playing both at home and with my students. I use the guitars as a form of mental health and as an investment. Do I know all the finite nuances of each guitar? No. However, I am learning. It is just one of my hobbies.
Ric1web1.jpg

Ric3web.jpg
I couldn't leave the others in the cases
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." Albert Einstein

You can never have to many guitars......or to many sports cars!!!
jakeox
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1123
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 7:40 am
Contact:

Re: Shadow v. Blackstar

Post by jakeox »

Great pics! I also have two Shadows. I got the pup 2 years ago, and the bass last month. I think I spent similar amounts on each ....
Attachments
pup.jpg
shadow_full.JPG
phlemmy

Re: Shadow v. Blackstar

Post by phlemmy »

drkatherine1 wrote:I didn't know what to title this photo.......... "Shadow Bookends" (How decadent) or "Who let the White One In? The prices on the basses have been in flux for the past year. One big reason is that they rarely trade hands and as time goes on they become more desirable. I paid far more than my significant other for my Shadow. I paid close to $3000.00 for it. I took some good natured teasing for paying over $4000.00 for the Tux but that was extenuating circumstances.......birthday present for the significant other. I play guitar.........if you can call it that and I just started playing bass. I have fun playing both at home and with my students. I use the guitars as a form of mental health and as an investment. Do I know all the finite nuances of each guitar? No. However, I am learning. It is just one of my hobbies.
Doc, if there ever comes a day that you or the siggy other decide to part with a Shadow, please let me know!
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: Shadow v. Blackstar

Post by johnallg »

Very nice basses! And Jake, that one cleaned up very nicely. :wink:
uffe
Junior Member
Posts: 137
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:14 pm

Re: Shadow v. Blackstar

Post by uffe »

forget the basses, check out that view
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Re: Shadow v. Blackstar

Post by rickaddict »

Beautiful basses, beautiful view, Dr. K.

I don't mean to bug ya but those stands are a Ricky face-plant waiting to happen. Their center of gravity is too high and they have no locking mechanism. Your Ricks are too nice to risk it.

I have no stock in this company, but you should consider these!

http://www.musiciansfriend.com/product/ ... sku=450417
Ender Zed
New member
Posts: 17
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 6:46 pm

Re: Shadow v. Blackstar

Post by Ender Zed »

bassduke49 wrote:The Shadow is more like a 4003 with the bound body and neck(?) and stereo output (right?), while the Blackstar (and the Tuxedo and Redneck) are 4003S models (SPC officially) and are mono with no binding. In case you haven't seen them, here are all three SPC models together; Ted Staberow's collection:
Man, I am in luv with that redneck Ric. :mrgreen:
"Film is the ultimate pervert art. “It doesn’t give you what you desire. It tells you how to desire.”---Slavoj Zizek
-------------------------------------------
BASSHowLowCanUgo
User avatar
ricosound
Intermediate Member
Posts: 759
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2003 11:36 am

Re: Shadow v. Blackstar

Post by ricosound »

Can anyone post or direct me to the photo featuring Tom Petty with the red neck?
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”