John Lennon's usage of his 325s during "Beatles for Sale"

Artists Who Use Rickenbackers

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

JakeK
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5757
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:08 pm

Re: John Lennon's usage of his 325s during "Beatles for Sale"

Post by JakeK »

Listening to "She's a Woman" right now. Could the chords be John's 325/6 or George's Gretsch Tennesean?
2ricks
Junior Member
Posts: 159
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 6:59 am

Re: John Lennon's usage of his 325s during "Beatles for Sale"

Post by 2ricks »

Didn't he use his '58 325 on Rock n Roll Music?
JakeK
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5757
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:08 pm

Re: John Lennon's usage of his 325s during "Beatles for Sale"

Post by JakeK »

That song was recorded October 18, 1964, along with various other tracks from that album. The '58 325 was last spotted in the studio September 29/30, 1964, so using the '58 on that song is a no-no.
User avatar
deaconblues
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2390
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 5:14 pm

Re: John Lennon's usage of his 325s during "Beatles for Sale"

Post by deaconblues »

What if they didn't take any pictures?
babysinblack
New member
Posts: 17
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 11:20 am

Re: John Lennon's usage of his 325s during "Beatles for Sale"

Post by babysinblack »

I read that the solo on "You Can't Do That" is John on his 1996. (I think the reference is from Geoff Emerick's book but I am operating from memory right now)
User avatar
tennis_nick
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1476
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 9:56 am

Re: John Lennon's usage of his 325s during "Beatles for Sale"

Post by tennis_nick »

babysinblack wrote:I read that the solo on "You Can't Do That" is John on his 1996. (I think the reference is from Geoff Emerick's book but I am operating from memory right now)
I think it's too soon for the 1996, I always figured it was the 2nd 325
babysinblack
New member
Posts: 17
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 11:20 am

Re: John Lennon's usage of his 325s during "Beatles for Sale"

Post by babysinblack »

I was wrong, it wasn't Geoff Emerick. Ray Coleman reports that John used his Rickenbacker 1996 slimline - acquired for "an astronomical $159 guineas at the beginning of 1964" - on the solo on "You Can't Do That". (page 237, Ray Coleman, "Lennon"). According to Coleman, John "hankered after(this guitar) during his lean, struggling years", and described it as his "pride and joy".
User avatar
wj350
Advanced Member
Posts: 1675
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 6:00 am

Re: John Lennon's usage of his 325s during "Beatles for Sale"

Post by wj350 »

I'd never heard that before--I was under the impression the 1996 was a quick substitute provided by Rose-Morris after discovering the neck crack in the Miami guitar, but I don't have any citation for where I heard that....

It seems you learn something everyday!
Bill
JakeK
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5757
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:08 pm

Re: John Lennon's usage of his 325s during "Beatles for Sale"

Post by JakeK »

I agree with you Bill. The place where I heard about the neck crack was Beatles Gear.

It doesn't make sense to me, as he would have taken it to America and all that.

I'M SO CONFUSED!!! :?
babysinblack
New member
Posts: 17
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 11:20 am

Re: John Lennon's usage of his 325s during "Beatles for Sale"

Post by babysinblack »

The plot thickens! Beatlesinvasion.com also supports the "Miami Replacement Theory" (MRT)

"When John’s second Rickenbacker was dropped during a 1964 Beatles Christmas show, he needed a replacement quickly. Rickenbacker’s exclusive British importer Rose-Morris Ltd. jumped at the opportunity to give John a new one. This fourth 325 (counting the 12-string) had a Fireglo (sunburst) finish and an f-hole. John used it for the rest of the 1964-1965 Christmas shows while his Jetglo was repaired. Shortly thereafter Rose-Morris Ltd. began marketing this “1996″ model of the 325 as the Beatle Backer."

So we have two conflicting accounts: Coleman says Lennon bought the guitar, gives the price, and dates it as early 64 - the other story says he was given it in late 64. It's a rickenbacker wrapped in an enigma....someone must be wrong. But even if he didn't know guitars, it seems unlikely that Coleman would have mistaken the red 1996 for the black 325 in his description of "You Can't Do That". Any chance Lennon owned a different Rickenbacker?

As for not taking the instrument to America, Coleman says Lennon asked Mal Evans to take "special care" of it (again, page 237); perhaps he didn't take it along because he didn't want to risk it. (It would be exciting and heartwarming to speculate that he took the 325/58 as a backup!) One thing I agree with you guys about - if the 1996 was a Rose-Morris, how could Lennon have hankered after it during the "struggling days"? But since John knew so little about details like model numbers, etc, perhaps he just thought the 1996 looked like a Ricky that he HAD hankered after....sorry bout the headaches!
JakeK
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5757
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:08 pm

Re: John Lennon's usage of his 325s during "Beatles for Sale"

Post by JakeK »

I'm thinking that Coleman mistaked the two 325s for each other. The December '64 acquistion of the 1996 sounds more correct to me.
User avatar
ric325v63
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 97
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2000 5:04 pm

Re: John Lennon's usage of his 325s during "Beatles for Sale"

Post by ric325v63 »

JakeK wrote:Listening to "She's a Woman" right now. Could the chords be John's 325/6 or George's Gretsch Tennesean?
I would bet a stack of bills on the 325/6 for the off beat chords. That clanking is pure 325.
Just make the time to play guitar!
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Artists”