Checkboard Binding, MOP inlays, a Fake Rickenbacker...!

Vintage, Modern, V & C Series, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
User avatar
gibsonlp
Technical Admin
Posts: 1734
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 10:40 pm
Contact:

Checkboard Binding, MOP inlays, a Fake Rickenbacker...!

Post by gibsonlp »

http://cgi.ebay.com/1966-Ideal-Rickenba ... dZViewItem
Easily identifiable, still - the MOP and CBB are pretty unique for a fake, don't you think?
So long and thanks for all the fish!
User avatar
winston
Membership Admin
Posts: 11010
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 5:00 am

Re: Checkboard Binding, MOP inlays, a Fake Rickenbacker...!

Post by winston »

Agreed it's unique, but it's still misshapen and ugly though.
“We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.” - Albert Einstein

"You do not really understand something unless you can explain it to your grandmother" - Albert Einstein
User avatar
whojamfan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2552
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 10:50 am
Contact:

Re: Checkboard Binding, MOP inlays, a Fake Rickenbacker...!

Post by whojamfan »

Hopefully this went to a person in a "WHO" tribute band who plans to "Townshend" this thing in the encore. :lol: :lol:
User avatar
1965
Advanced Member
Posts: 1607
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2008 11:01 pm

Re: Checkboard Binding, MOP inlays, a Fake Rickenbacker...!

Post by 1965 »

I don't think it has MOP inlays, they look fairly similar to the RIC sparkle inlays. I'm sure they're nowhere near as good in person though. The tailpiece/ramp is making me gag, they took the beautiful sloping curve of the RIC ramp and made it into a bunch of geometric shapes. Yuck.
User avatar
jimk
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5355
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 7:27 am
Contact:

Re: Checkboard Binding, MOP inlays, a Fake Rickenbacker...!

Post by jimk »

Don't you folks find it interesting that those Rickenfaker Makers seem consistently to get some significant detail wrong? For example tail pieces, or TRCs not quite the right shape, or an obvious deviation from a certain curvature. even wrong pickups. If forgery is the intent, all the fakers I've seen are pretty bad ones.

I dunno....I'm just this dude from Kansas. Three chords and The Truth is all I know (the definition of country music.)

JimK

[Edit: Ooh, twenty more posts to go till 1,000! :shock: ]
User avatar
deaconblues
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2390
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 5:14 pm

Re: Checkboard Binding, MOP inlays, a Fake Rickenbacker...!

Post by deaconblues »

jimk wrote:Don't you folks find it interesting that those Rickenfaker Makers seem consistently to get some significant detail wrong? For example tail pieces, or TRCs not quite the right shape, or an obvious deviation from a certain curvature. even wrong pickups. If forgery is the intent, all the fakers I've seen are pretty bad ones.

I dunno....I'm just this dude from Kansas. Three chords and The Truth is all I know (the definition of country music.)

JimK

[Edit: Ooh, twenty more posts to go till 1,000! :shock: ]
Why spend a lot of money or time on something that's not the real thing? In the end, these have to sell for dirt cheap.
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: Checkboard Binding, MOP inlays, a Fake Rickenbacker...!

Post by jingle_jangle »

Heelariously ironic that they got the iconic and blew the rest into a trash can.

(It's got the desirable inlays and the nice binding, but it might as well be a hockey stick. EVERYTHING else is wrong, wrong, wrong.
User avatar
1965
Advanced Member
Posts: 1607
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2008 11:01 pm

Re: Checkboard Binding, MOP inlays, a Fake Rickenbacker...!

Post by 1965 »

dpowell wrote:Why spend a lot of money or time on something that's not the real thing? In the end, these have to sell for dirt cheap.
$500 isn't that cheap. Can't believe someone would spend that much on this POS. How hard could it be to save for a few more months and buy the real deal?
User avatar
jimk
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5355
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 7:27 am
Contact:

Re: Checkboard Binding, MOP inlays, a Fake Rickenbacker...!

Post by jimk »

I quite agree with all three of you gentlemen.

JimK
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: by John Simmons”