Neck on 4001C64
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
Neck on 4001C64
Does anyone know if the necks on the 4001C64 series are true to the much vaunted slim 60's necks, or are they similar to a 4003? My V63 has the thicker neck and if the C series basses do as well, would this be due to the modern truss rod system?
-
jwr2
-
jwr2
the v63's and the v64's basically have a 4003 neck ... with slight differences ... there may be 1/64" difference in wood thickness ... but no major changes ...
A real 1960's 4001 neck is a different animal ... just stringing it with modern strings stresses it beyond its design specs ... my '68 handles this stress quite well ... but some don't ... also the old truss rod system was cumbersome and dangerous ... some 60's necks have neck damage from improperly adjusted truss rods ...
A real 1960's 4001 neck is a different animal ... just stringing it with modern strings stresses it beyond its design specs ... my '68 handles this stress quite well ... but some don't ... also the old truss rod system was cumbersome and dangerous ... some 60's necks have neck damage from improperly adjusted truss rods ...
- headbanger
- Veteran RRF member
- Posts: 735
- Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2001 10:06 pm
Steve,no..... I have a '64 4001S and a 1998 4003. I recently got to play a C64 and a 2000 V63 side by side and yes the C64 has a slimmer neck than a 4003 or V63 but none of them comes close to the feel of the '64. I didn't have my 4003 to compare to the V and C but they all felt similar to each other except for the slightly slimmer neck on the C64. In all other ways it felt closer to my 4003 than the '64. The '64 is ultra thin in the neck and headstock.
- atomic_punk
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5093
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 5:00 am
- Contact:
For what its worth, I think the modern Rick basses, be it reissues or whatever, have considerably more mass in the neck and headpiece, do to stability factors implemented at Rickenbacker to offset modern playing styles and the various string guages we use. I think its the only way they can go unless they get into graphite reinforcement. Here's an example of my '01 fireglow compared to my '76 mapleglow.



"Knowledge is Power"
- squirebass
- Veteran RRF member
- Posts: 1579
- Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2000 11:05 pm
Scott, what were the exact numbers you got from the above measurements.... I'll check mine and see what I come up with...
I have noticed a change in headstocks that happened between my '93 v63 and a '97 model. The '97 was much wider and I noticed the same phenomenon on the Chris Squire basses. Early ones seemed to have a slimmer profile later ones fatter.
I have noticed a change in headstocks that happened between my '93 v63 and a '97 model. The '97 was much wider and I noticed the same phenomenon on the Chris Squire basses. Early ones seemed to have a slimmer profile later ones fatter.
"This is the big one, Elizabeth, I'm coming to join ya, honey!"
