1997 vs 1998 PT

Vintage, Modern, V & C Series, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37337
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: 1997 vs 1998 PT

Post by jps »

So....... we'll be seeing you at MARF, Jake? :?: :wink: 8)
JakeK
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5757
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:08 pm

Re: 1997 vs 1998 PT

Post by JakeK »

If I can talk the folks into it and work around my school schedule, hell yeah!
BobKat
Advanced Member
Posts: 1712
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 9:18 am

Re: 1997 vs 1998 PT

Post by BobKat »

The 1998PT will have washers under the retaining bushings for the tuners. Also, of course, the third pickup and R. You could fake a 1998PT using an early 1997 SPC VB and changing the tailpece. But you would really have to know the finer details.

Later 1997s changed in very minute but significant ways, from color of finish to tuners to head shape and neck profile.
shamustwin
Senior Member
Posts: 5285
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 5:00 am

Re: 1997 vs 1998 PT

Post by shamustwin »

I came late to this party...
I haven't done in depth comparisons with my 1997's, but they all play great. The "newest", a 2000 I believe, has a thicker neck. I love that guitar, it's my main gigging one. I've been strat-free lately.
User avatar
ken_j
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4216
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 5:31 am
Contact:

Re: 1997 vs 1998 PT

Post by ken_j »

For an extra $2500 I would rather buy a second guitar or amp, but most likely I would keep it in the bank. :) :) :)
"The best things in life aren't things."
kerchang
New member
Posts: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 3:37 am

Re: 1997 vs 1998 PT

Post by kerchang »

Get a PT! There's something very special about those models. :D
User avatar
AQuickOne
New member
Posts: 78
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 2:06 pm

Re: 1997 vs 1998 PT

Post by AQuickOne »

I have a 1997SPC/VB made in (ironically) 1998. This guitar is nearly identical to the PT except the GUCCI pickguard. I have done much to this by way of electronics. Installed a vintage cap between the tone knob like the RM era guitars, made sure that the pU's were wound to the right specs of '64. I put some Thomastik's on it for that jangly sound. It really sounds perfect through an AC30. I would say, you can have a virtual 1964 RM Ric for less than half the cost. Mine was $1200 on Ebay 6 years ago, $50 more for upgrades, wahlah! I keep track of these on ebay. First, they rarely come up. Second, when they do, for some reason, nobody buys them! Are these just not popular with collectors? They seem to be the dog of the RIC family. I love mine however, sounds just like the first two Who albums.
You are KAOS, I am CONTROL!
'98 FG 1997SPC/VB
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: 1997 vs 1998 PT

Post by jingle_jangle »

Welcome, Jeff!

Now, about that "wahlah" thingie...maybe you mean "voilá"???
shamustwin
Senior Member
Posts: 5285
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 5:00 am

Re: 1997 vs 1998 PT

Post by shamustwin »

My ex-girlfriend played the viola. :D
User avatar
AQuickOne
New member
Posts: 78
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 2:06 pm

Re: 1997 vs 1998 PT

Post by AQuickOne »

Sorry, strong aversion to all things French
You are KAOS, I am CONTROL!
'98 FG 1997SPC/VB
User avatar
deaconblues
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2390
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 5:14 pm

Re: 1997 vs 1998 PT

Post by deaconblues »

Hey Jeff, welcome to the forum! Nice username...

It seems that the 1997/1998s have been undergoing a bit of a resurgence in popularity this year. Prices are now up to around $2500 USD.
User avatar
AQuickOne
New member
Posts: 78
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 2:06 pm

Re: 1997 vs 1998 PT

Post by AQuickOne »

Thanks.
I am glad to hear that more people are taking notice of these and their worth to the RIC family, they really were/are great guitars and need to be recognised.
You are KAOS, I am CONTROL!
'98 FG 1997SPC/VB
User avatar
collin
Senior Member
Posts: 6979
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 6:28 pm

Re: 1997 vs 1998 PT

Post by collin »

AQuickOne wrote:I have a 1997SPC/VB made in (ironically) 1998. Mine was $1200 on Ebay 6 years ago.......I keep track of these on ebay. First, they rarely come up. Second, when they do, for some reason, nobody buys them! Are these just not popular with collectors? They seem to be the dog of the RIC family..
well, 6 years ago it was 2002, which would have made your 1997SPC only a four year old used guitar, and a model that had only been discontinued for about a year or so, hence the low price.

It's natural for any discontinued model to go up in price. For some reason (?) they didn't sell massive numbers of them when they were available (largely, I believe because it was similar in price to the more deluxe 360v64 model), hence their somewhat rarity these days.

I wouldn't call them the dog of the RIC family though, they are quite collectible and have been so for at least four years now. I do agree though, that they are important models in the Ric family.

Cheers,
-Collin
User avatar
AQuickOne
New member
Posts: 78
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 2:06 pm

Re: 1997 vs 1998 PT

Post by AQuickOne »

Here is one, a plain 1997 on ebay right now. It is in Austrailia, so I don't think it will sell. http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... 0292521181
Price seems too high, just my opinion.
You are KAOS, I am CONTROL!
'98 FG 1997SPC/VB
User avatar
AQuickOne
New member
Posts: 78
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 2:06 pm

Re: 1997 vs 1998 PT

Post by AQuickOne »

I think another reason they did not sell very well when they were available, was because most people who were new to Rickenbacker were confused by the F hole. Lets face it, RIckenbacker's look has always been about the cool catseye soundhole.
You are KAOS, I am CONTROL!
'98 FG 1997SPC/VB
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: by John Simmons”