Suspicious looking bass

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Re: Suspicious looking bass

Post by rickaddict »

beatlefreak wrote:What about Scott's comment about the fretboard extending onto the body that far?
Oops! (See my edited post!)

Now re-posted below:
rickaddict wrote: And I don't think the neck extends any farther into the body than my 70's Ricks. I think the effect you're seeing is just a result of the camera angle combined with the cheesy homemade pick guard.
User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13207
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Re: Suspicious looking bass

Post by rickenbrother »

Pedro, welcome to the forum. The inlays and fingerboard to not look right to me, but it could be the photos.

As mentioned before, the triangle inlays and binding would not normally be found on the one pickup 4000
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
User avatar
paologregorio
Senior Member
Posts: 6376
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Suspicious looking bass

Post by paologregorio »

Ask him to remove the TRC, and take a snapshot of the rout, which should show two truss rod ends if it's the real deal. :D That will put the matter to rest.
User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13207
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Re: Suspicious looking bass

Post by rickenbrother »

They have to be the right truss rods. There are some fakers that have two rods.
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
User avatar
cheyenne
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6261
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2001 11:39 am

Re: Suspicious looking bass

Post by cheyenne »

Take a good look where the fingerboard joins the body..
dscf265305222.JPG
Now look at where the fingerboard joins on my '97 4003.
Rick pic.jpg
I really dont think its camera angle...
"Knowledge is Power"
User avatar
cjj
RRF Moderator
Posts: 10931
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:17 pm
Contact:

Re: Suspicious looking bass

Post by cjj »

OK, look at where it joins on my '76 4001:

Image

I don't think we can go with the fingerboard placement as a definite faker identifier.
Last edited by cjj on Fri Oct 24, 2008 3:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I have NO idea what to do with those skinny stringed things... I'm just a bass player...
User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13207
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Re: Suspicious looking bass

Post by rickenbrother »

And as well, where the neck joins the body on my '79 4001.
Image
Last edited by rickenbrother on Fri Oct 24, 2008 3:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Re: Suspicious looking bass

Post by rickaddict »

You make a good argument, Scott!

But I stand by my assessment. The horns on a 1997 4003 are thinner and the body wings come in a little closer to the end of the fret board than an early 70's 4001.

Also we're looking at the basses from two different angles.
User avatar
cheyenne
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6261
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2001 11:39 am

Re: Suspicious looking bass

Post by cheyenne »

By gosh, I stand corrected.

I've always assumed that this was something "consistant" through the years. I guess not. I really appreciate you guys bringing that to my attention.

However,,I still think its a faker due to the apparent lack of the neck PUP route, and darker fingerboard. The truss rods need to be examined, and the binding at the bottom of the body. Does it have stereo and mono jacks???
"Knowledge is Power"
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: Suspicious looking bass

Post by johnallg »

cheyenne wrote:Besides that, a 4000 would have "dot" inlays and no binding.... :D
And not be neckthrough.
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Re: Suspicious looking bass

Post by rickaddict »

We'll get to the bottom of this, dammit!

Come on everybody, lets chant for more photos:

"TRUSS RODS, TRUSS RODS, TRUSS RODS..."

8)
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Re: Suspicious looking bass

Post by rickaddict »

johnallg wrote: And not be neckthrough.
Good point!
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: Suspicious looking bass

Post by johnallg »

My gut feeling is it is a 4001. No faker 4000s were made, and the binding on the body looks more RIC - didn't fakers have CB also? The quality of the maple also looks better then the fakers had too. The dark fingerboard could have been stained at some time.

We need to see under the truss rod cover.
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Re: Suspicious looking bass

Post by rickaddict »

"TRUSS RODS, TRUSS RODS...."
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37498
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Suspicious looking bass

Post by jps »

rickaddict wrote:
johnallg wrote: And not be neckthrough.
Good point!
4000 basses were neckthrough into the early '70s I think.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”