fake 1977?
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
-
alexcairncross
- New member
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 5:38 pm
- Contact:
fake 1977?
or maybe just beat up and modified
http://12fret.com/used/Riki4001whitePJ6981.jpg
http://12fret.com/used/Riki4001whitePJ6981frnt.jpg
http://12fret.com/used/Riki4001whitePJ6981bk.jpg
being sold at twelfth fret in Toronto...
I'm not quite sure but it it's pretty beat up regardless, no shedua, the binding doesn't look right and the bridge has obviously been switched
http://12fret.com/used/Riki4001whitePJ6981.jpg
http://12fret.com/used/Riki4001whitePJ6981frnt.jpg
http://12fret.com/used/Riki4001whitePJ6981bk.jpg
being sold at twelfth fret in Toronto...
I'm not quite sure but it it's pretty beat up regardless, no shedua, the binding doesn't look right and the bridge has obviously been switched
- kennyhowes
- Veteran RRF member
- Posts: 5022
- Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2001 1:03 am
- Contact:
Re: fake 1977?
Seems legit to me, but of course would want to see the serial number etc. ...
-
rickaddict
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6163
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am
Re: fake 1977?
It's real. It has no skunk because it is an opaque finish.
Re: fake 1977?
I wonder why they cut the surround?
-
rickaddict
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6163
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am
Re: fake 1977?
Serial number is PJ 6981 (Oct, 1976)
Who would DO that to a bridge pickup surround and why?!

Who would DO that to a bridge pickup surround and why?!
- beatlefreak
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6160
- Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:45 am
- Contact:
Re: fake 1977?
The same fool who would carve their initials into the face of the body.
or maybe he was just marking the front of it.
or maybe he was just marking the front of it.
Re: fake 1977?
I got a '79 in the same colors in slightly worse condition for $700 four years ago. Paul W brought it back from the dead for me. They're a nice bass. Strip all that **** off and the skunk stripe will be there.
-
alexcairncross
- New member
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 5:38 pm
- Contact:
Re: fake 1977?
at that price it'd make sense and then put work into it...
I don't get it, badass...fro? I guess
I don't get it, badass...fro? I guess
Re: fake 1977?
The surround was cut to allow the strings to clear because the BadAss sits so much lower, and probably complicated by and because of the rods needing to take an upbow out of the neck.
In that condition, way overpriced. It may be relic'd with a lot of mojo, but unless your name is Fro, this one needs work and parts.
In that condition, way overpriced. It may be relic'd with a lot of mojo, but unless your name is Fro, this one needs work and parts.
-
rickaddict
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6163
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am
Re: fake 1977?
johnallg wrote: ... but unless your name is Fro, this one needs work and parts.
