12 String talk

General Rickenbacker discussion

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

david748r
New member
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 12:39 pm

12 String talk

Post by david748r »

I am new to Rickenbacker and new to this forum so forgive me if this posting is not appropriate. I am looking to acquire a 12 string hollowbody for a Beatles Tribute Band in the UK. It seems that the 12 saddle bridge is recommended (I saw a bad review of the six saddle bridge) which pushes me towards a 381 or a modified 360. Has anyone compared either of these with the 360/12C1963 (kind of the obvious choice) which seems to have a hybrid six saddle bridge. Does it actually matter which one goes for? Last, but not least, does anyone have a view on the best Y Stero cable to get for the Ric-o-sound. Can't find one on the Rick web site so assume they don't sell them. Oh lastly (really) has anyone used the stereo lead on a Fender Deluxe Reverb amp. If so is it good bad indifferent? Thanks.
User avatar
jdogric12
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 10925
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 6:00 am

Re: 12 String talk

Post by jdogric12 »

Welcome David.

I can respond to the 12-saddle bridge portion of your post.

That's something they came up with around the time of the McGuinn model in the late 80's for better intonation. Until then, every Rick 12 had a 6-saddle bridge. Unless you play a lot of lead lines above the 7th fret, you shouldn't have any problems. Plus, a 6-saddle would be historically accurate for the Beatles era. Either a 360/12v64 (a discontinued reissue series, not hard to find) or the current, more accurate reissue, the 360/12C63 should suit your needs just fine.

I use the discontinued Ric-O-Sound box for stereo, but search around here a little bit and you'll find answers to your questions.
User avatar
deaconblues
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2390
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 5:14 pm

Re: 12 String talk

Post by deaconblues »

A 381 does not have a 12-saddle bridge, as it is a reissue of a 1969 instrument. A 660 does, however - as per Tom Petty's specifications.
User avatar
beatlefreak
Senior Member
Posts: 6160
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:45 am
Contact:

Re: 12 String talk

Post by beatlefreak »

The vast majority of twelve string Ricks will set up and intone correctly using the six saddle bridge and the recommended string gauges. The very small percentage that don't are the only ones that need the twelve saddle bridge. Note that using the twelve saddle bridge can change the tone of your instrument.
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: 12 String talk

Post by jingle_jangle »

Don't base your choice of an instrument on the bridge...these can be easily swapped out. Since it's a Beatles tribute band, the obvious choice would be the 360/12C63. And, if it was good enough for Mr. Harrison, it'll be fine for you! And, don't worry about the intonation issue. It's part of the Jangle, in the case of vintage Invasion tunes.
User avatar
kiramdear
RRF Moderator
Posts: 9045
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 2:51 am
Contact:

Re: 12 String talk

Post by kiramdear »

What is it they say, close enough for rock and roll? :lol:

I don't remember seeing 12-string saddles before they invented cheap electronic tuners. Ignorance was bliss. 8)
All I wanna do is rock!
User avatar
paologregorio
Senior Member
Posts: 6376
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: 12 String talk

Post by paologregorio »

dpowell wrote:A 381 does not have a 12-saddle bridge, as it is a reissue of a 1969 instrument. A 660 does, however - as per Tom Petty's specifications.
My 381/12 came with one. :?
User avatar
ken_j
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4216
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 5:31 am
Contact:

Re: 12 String talk

Post by ken_j »

If you go with a 360C63 or a 360V64 you won't need a stereo cord. These models have dual mono outputs. If you buy a model with Rick-O-Sound any quality stereo guitar cord will work fine. I have a C63 with a six saddle bridge. It has no issues with intonation.
"The best things in life aren't things."
User avatar
deaconblues
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2390
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 5:14 pm

Re: 12 String talk

Post by deaconblues »

paologregorio wrote:
dpowell wrote:A 381 does not have a 12-saddle bridge, as it is a reissue of a 1969 instrument. A 660 does, however - as per Tom Petty's specifications.
My 381/12 came with one. :?
Huh...I guess it's because the 12-string version is not *technically* a reissue??? Thanks.
User avatar
tennis_nick
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1476
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 9:56 am

Re: 12 String talk

Post by tennis_nick »

dpowell wrote:
paologregorio wrote:
dpowell wrote:A 381 does not have a 12-saddle bridge, as it is a reissue of a 1969 instrument. A 660 does, however - as per Tom Petty's specifications.
My 381/12 came with one. :?
Huh...I guess it's because the 12-string version is not *technically* a reissue??? Thanks.
And it would be quite ridiculous for a 6 string to have a 12 saddle bridge anyways!
User avatar
deaconblues
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2390
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 5:14 pm

Re: 12 String talk

Post by deaconblues »

tennis_nick wrote: And it would be quite ridiculous for a 6 string to have a 12 saddle bridge anyways!
Talking about the 12er here. :?:
User avatar
tennis_nick
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1476
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 9:56 am

Re: 12 String talk

Post by tennis_nick »

dpowell wrote:
tennis_nick wrote: And it would be quite ridiculous for a 6 string to have a 12 saddle bridge anyways!
Talking about the 12er here. :?:

And I'M just talking about irrelevant useless comments that I make that don't move the conversation along at all, but hey, posting here keeps me out of my chemistry book!
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: 12 String talk

Post by johnallg »

As for Ric-O-Sound, here is a good alternative if you want a box:
http://www.bayoucables.com/bayouosound-box-p-222.html

Great cables from them also.
User avatar
deaconblues
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2390
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 5:14 pm

Re: 12 String talk

Post by deaconblues »

tennis_nick wrote: And I'M just talking about irrelevant useless comments that I make that don't move the conversation along at all, but hey, posting here keeps me out of my chemistry book!
I hear that!
User avatar
jdogric12
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 10925
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 6:00 am

Re: 12 String talk

Post by jdogric12 »

Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker General: by Howard Bishop”