I don't think this is a f*ker

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
s4001
Senior Member
Posts: 3514
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 5:00 am
Contact:

I don't think this is a f*ker

Post by s4001 »

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... 3DWatching

used and abused, but I think it might have been the real deal?
User avatar
ben_brown
Advanced Member
Posts: 2503
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 6:00 am

Re: I don't think this is a f*ker

Post by ben_brown »

Interesting...
'73 4001 MG '88 4003S JG '89 4003S FG '91 4003S MG
User avatar
weemac
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2735
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2002 1:28 am

Re: I don't think this is a f*ker

Post by weemac »

You will really need to see under the trc to know for sure...
Eden.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37509
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: I don't think this is a f*ker

Post by jps »

Looks fake to me, the strap button is in the wrong location on the upper horn, the horns are shaped wrong, especially the lower one, the headstock shape looks awkward along the E/A side...
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: I don't think this is a f*ker

Post by johnallg »

I believe Scott is right and someone got a real bargain. Look at the bubinga fretboard. It is real.
User avatar
whojamfan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2552
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 10:50 am
Contact:

Re: I don't think this is a f*ker

Post by whojamfan »

The ad says it's a faker, for what it's worth.
User avatar
marc61
Senior Member
Posts: 6443
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2003 9:31 am
Contact:

Re: I don't think this is a f*ker

Post by marc61 »

I think it's fake. Inlays don' look right to me. Also seller describes bow, and doesn't know if "truss" is working right. the lack of plural makes me think there's only one truss rod
User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13218
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Re: I don't think this is a f*ker

Post by rickenbrother »

Could just be the lighting in the pictures, but the inlays don't look right to me either.
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Re: I don't think this is a f*ker

Post by rickaddict »

My vote is FAKE. Horn shape is a little off, binding extends too far behind the tail, fret board and inlays look a little off, headstock shape is a little off, pickups are fake, strap button is in the wrong place, TRC is fake, tuners were replaced because they were inferior. All bolt-on parts are non-Rick.

BURN IT!

:twisted:

* Please, I'm only joking when I say burn it. No need to call me an idiot, this time! Ideally this faker should be donated to a needy child that wants to learn bass.
Attachments
JGfake.JPG
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: I don't think this is a f*ker

Post by johnallg »

I still say it is real. I have never seen a fretboard like that on a faker. The bridge pup surround is not RIC though.
User avatar
bassassin
Junior Member
Posts: 166
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 1:51 pm
Contact:

Re: I don't think this is a f*ker

Post by bassassin »

johnallg wrote:I still say it is real. I have never seen a fretboard like that on a faker. The bridge pup surround is not RIC though.
Neither is the bridge pickup - it looks much too square, just like the ones that appear on some copies. Although those usually have crosshead polepieces, and this doesn't appear to. The fretboard wood does look paler than most Fakers, not sure about the inlays but they don't look moto enough for JapCrap to me.

Unless this a more obscure copy (Italian Gherson or Brazilian Giannini, perhaps) I'm inclined to think it's real. It's such a bitsa that there's no hardware there that helps identify it one way or t'other.

Jon.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37509
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: I don't think this is a f*ker

Post by jps »

The neck pickup cover is shaped all wrong, this is not a jenuwyne Rick. :mrgreen:
rickcrazy
RRF Consultant
Posts: 3578
Joined: Thu May 30, 2002 4:11 am

Re: I don't think this is a f*ker

Post by rickcrazy »

It is not the real thing, period. 8)
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37509
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: I don't think this is a f*ker

Post by jps »

rickcrazy wrote:It is not the real thing, period. 8)
Why don't they believe us? :?
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: I don't think this is a f*ker

Post by johnallg »

That is the best Rickenfaker fretboard I've ever seen......
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”