Question on the 4003S/8

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
User avatar
bassduke49
Senior Member
Posts: 6580
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am

Question on the 4003S/8

Post by bassduke49 »

There's a 4003S/8 on ebay right now, and he describes it as having the "staggered tuners" like the eight-strings in the '60s (and that would be another question, but for now . . . ). So this one has small keyes on the octave string tuners, big ones on the big strings. These are the typical streamlined Schaller tuners, but have we ever seen another like this with the big/small keys?
Attachments
5c86_12.JPG
User avatar
incubus2432
Senior Member
Posts: 4174
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 11:26 am

Re: Question on the 4003S/8

Post by incubus2432 »

I'd say that is certainly not factory.....not a bad idea if it was used to keep a smaller headstock and tighten up the tuner spacing but not much advantage doing it like this. Easy enough to change to "correct".
User avatar
hieronymous
Intermediate Member
Posts: 837
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2005 10:46 pm
Contact:

Re: Question on the 4003S/8

Post by hieronymous »

I would have liked to see it with the original black trim/hardware!

I read somewhere that having all the tuners the same size allowed the owner to switch the string configuration - the 4008 had the octave strings on top, the 4003S/8 on the bottom (like the eBay example). I don't recall ever seeing one with small tuners for the octave strings, certainly not a 4003S/8.

Here's my '82 4008 for comparison:
Image

And I believe the 4003S/8 was discontinued in the early 2000s, not the mid-'90s as the eBay description says.
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: Question on the 4003S/8

Post by sloop_john_b »

I believe the seller is refering to the "potatohead".
User avatar
antipodean
Senior Member
Posts: 3182
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 1:27 am

Re: Question on the 4003S/8

Post by antipodean »

I believe the mod has been done to avoid "tuner clash". Whilst the stock tuner buttons might not actually clash, they can be close enough to make tuning challenging.....
"I don't want to sound incredulous but I can't believe it" Rex Mossop
User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13218
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Re: Question on the 4003S/8

Post by rickenbrother »

antipodean wrote:Whilst the stock tuner buttons might not actually clash, they can be close enough to make tuning challenging.....
It's not that bad really. Seems easy after tuning a 12 string bass! :mrgreen:
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
User avatar
antipodean
Senior Member
Posts: 3182
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 1:27 am

Re: Question on the 4003S/8

Post by antipodean »

rickenbrother wrote:
antipodean wrote:Whilst the stock tuner buttons might not actually clash, they can be close enough to make tuning challenging.....
It's not that bad really. Seems easy after tuning a 12 string bass! :mrgreen:
I believe that Les Claypool may have been onto something with his one-string bass.....
"I don't want to sound incredulous but I can't believe it" Rex Mossop
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”