5 string maple fingerboard 4003 questions

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13194
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Re: 5 string maple fingerboard 4003 questions

Post by rickenbrother »

cjj wrote: I'd say that unless someone did some serious (and seriously good) headstock mods, that one was made as a 5 string.
It has the right headstock shape, like this S/5.
Image
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
User avatar
cjj
RRF Moderator
Posts: 10931
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:17 pm
Contact:

Re: 5 string maple fingerboard 4003 questions

Post by cjj »

That's what I was trying to say. All the aftermarket modified 5's I've seen have the 3 tuners on the other side since there's a bit more room there. In order to get them on the "correct" side, you'd have to replace the headstock wing to get more room. Definitely easier on a solid color like Jetglo, but still a fairly complicated/serious mod.
I have NO idea what to do with those skinny stringed things... I'm just a bass player...
User avatar
kssound
New member
Posts: 71
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2008 6:06 pm

Re: 5 string maple fingerboard 4003 questions

Post by kssound »

VRICKY63 wrote:This is fun...............most interesting..........looks like we need factory help on this one.
Well, if you have a way to get more info from the Ricky folks I would be interested.
here is the entirety of the e-mail I got from Rickenbacker when I sent them pictures and asked what I had.

"Hey Scott,
Your bass is a 4003/5 with a Maple neck that must have been put on sometime after it left the factory. You do not see many of the 4003/5’s. You see way more of the 4003S/5’s.

Thanks,

Richard Cannata

Rickenbacker International Corp.
Customer Service
3895 S. Main St
Santa Ana, Ca 92707
714.545.5574"

I keep meaning to send Richard more pictures of the neck, body and headstock showing the interface of the fingerboard to the rest of the bass. I took the pictures months ago but with 4 year old twins, I don't seem to have time to scratch my butt much less do some of the other fun distractions in life. Now that I see how the picture was posted I will upload some of them tonight and post them for you to see.
Scott
Sparky,

Snohomish, WA
72-4001 JG, 73-4001 JG, 86-4003/5 JG hmmm someday I might have to try a color!
User avatar
bassduke49
Senior Member
Posts: 6580
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am

Re: 5 string maple fingerboard 4003 questions

Post by bassduke49 »

I've been studying Rick basses for about five years now, and thought I've seen all there is to see. I hate using the word "unique," but this just may be. But we've come to find that RIC, although without a true "custom shop," once in a great while will produce interesting feature combinations for experiment or for special customers. My bet is that one of these is the case here, if it is truly "all factory." The fretboard is the easiest to mod, I suppose. This appears to be a board from a Blackstar (with "microdot" position markers), and we know there are a few five-string Blackstars out there. I like it!

I also like Richard's comment "don't see MANY 4003/5," indicating there may be some more out there!
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: 5 string maple fingerboard 4003 questions

Post by johnallg »

Scott, most interesting bass. Closeup pictures of the neck/fretboard joining would indeed be interesting. Does the JG and clearcoat CV finish of the neck look different from the body of the bass? This could help decide.

A 4003/5 is a rare bird indeed - first one I've seen. And welcome aboard the RRF train. If you want to fully fund your Rick habit AND the twin's college educations, figure out how to bottle all their energy - you'll sell all you can get! :lol:

Paul, were the Blackstars from 1985/86 time frame? I can't remember without researching.
User avatar
kssound
New member
Posts: 71
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2008 6:06 pm

Re: 5 string maple fingerboard 4003 questions

Post by kssound »

johnallg wrote:Scott, most interesting bass. Closeup pictures of the neck/fretboard joining would indeed be interesting. Does the JG and clearcoat CV finish of the neck look different from the body of the bass? This could help decide.
Ok heres my first try at posting a picture. I think my wife trashed my pics but I found a couple only one is decent enough for this purpose. I'm going to go get it out of the case and take some more :)

Image
Sparky,

Snohomish, WA
72-4001 JG, 73-4001 JG, 86-4003/5 JG hmmm someday I might have to try a color!
User avatar
tennis_nick
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1476
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 9:56 am

Re: 5 string maple fingerboard 4003 questions

Post by tennis_nick »

Huh, the fingerboard doesn't appear to have the "piled up by the frets" CV I've noted on several Ricks, kinda supports the replacement board theory.
User avatar
kssound
New member
Posts: 71
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2008 6:06 pm

Re: 5 string maple fingerboard 4003 questions

Post by kssound »

tennis_nick wrote:Huh, the fingerboard doesn't appear to have the "piled up by the frets" CV I've noted on several Ricks, kinda supports the replacement board theory.
OK, I'm lost, what's CV?

I'm just downloading pics from the camera
Sparky,

Snohomish, WA
72-4001 JG, 73-4001 JG, 86-4003/5 JG hmmm someday I might have to try a color!
User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13194
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Re: 5 string maple fingerboard 4003 questions

Post by rickenbrother »

kssound wrote: OK, I'm lost, what's CV?
CV = Conversion Varnish. Nicholas was referring to the clear coat on the fingerboard.
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37496
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: 5 string maple fingerboard 4003 questions

Post by jps »

From that photo it looks stock and unaltered to me.
User avatar
rikk
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1414
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 3:04 pm

Re: 5 string maple fingerboard 4003 questions

Post by rikk »

The binding looks slightly over the frets ands just like all of mine. Could be factory. More pics PLEASE!!!!!!!
User avatar
flint
New member
Posts: 32
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 6:34 am

Re: 5 string maple fingerboard 4003 questions

Post by flint »

I think this could be the post of the week ... does make you wonder who gave birth to this little gem ...
User avatar
kssound
New member
Posts: 71
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2008 6:06 pm

Re: 5 string maple fingerboard 4003 questions

Post by kssound »

the only thing that I ever wondered about was the masking of the black near the binding near the body joint
Image

heres the head stock
Image

and the body
Image

I'm having trouble posting these so I'm going to send these ones
Sparky,

Snohomish, WA
72-4001 JG, 73-4001 JG, 86-4003/5 JG hmmm someday I might have to try a color!
User avatar
bassduke49
Senior Member
Posts: 6580
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am

Re: 5 string maple fingerboard 4003 questions

Post by bassduke49 »

These shots make the fretboard look much darker than the first one you posted. Sometimes the bubinga that RIC uses is pretty light, sometimes dark, sometimes figured, sometimes not. Definitely not the "microdot" position markers I suspected. Still a curiosity.
User avatar
kssound
New member
Posts: 71
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2008 6:06 pm

Re: 5 string maple fingerboard 4003 questions

Post by kssound »

trying again

http://home.comcast.net/~kssound/site/?/photos/

this is the link to all the shots I have uploaded
Sparky,

Snohomish, WA
72-4001 JG, 73-4001 JG, 86-4003/5 JG hmmm someday I might have to try a color!
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”