Now you're talking!kiramdear wrote:I like buckle rash. It means I have a chance of being able to afford it.
I think for me the first ding is the hardest to accept... all the ones that follow are just part of the ball game.
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
Now you're talking!kiramdear wrote:I like buckle rash. It means I have a chance of being able to afford it.
I remember those "guitar guard" things. Wait, does that make me an old-timer???jingle_jangle wrote:That's the silliest, ugliest piece of guitar kit I've EVER seen. Dumb, dopey, extrasuperfluous...
"Hide the beauty of your guitar in this badly-fitted, ugly-colored cloth condom."
This reminds me of putting ugly seat covers on a brand new car (Chicago Polish people were known for this in the '50s and '60s), so that after you were done making all the payments, you could trade it in and the next guy could enjoy the like-new factory upholstery underneath.
Begs also the question: How can a piece of flannel prevent a belt buckle from digging into a guitar's finish?
Years ago, Fender offered an accessory called a "guitar Guard", made by Parker. I'm sure some of you old-timers would remember these. They were custom-fitted to each model of guitar, available in different colors and see-through (I own several transparent ones), and, except for a 10mm wide band of foam around the edge for friction and abrasion protection, were practically invisible. They only covered the back and halfway around the sides.
The band of foam, however, was the problem...it degenerated and the chemicals attacked the lacquer of the guitar.
A good idea badly executed in the end.
With that red color, black piping on the edge, and Star Trek silhouetted emblem, it looks like one of the infamous, nameless "red shirt" security personnel from the original Star Trek series...you know the ones who always get killed by the space aliens within five minutes of beaming down to some unexplored planet. There's no way I'd wrap one of those around any of my guitars!rickaddict wrote:Okay, I'm often accused of maybe being a little bit too careful with my Ricks. You know, I'll Scratch-X and Zymol the older ones 'till they shine like new...I'll store them in their case when I'm not using them...When I set my Ricks down at band practice or a gig, I'll always put them on a very sturdy stand...I like to keep my Ricks clean, and I do get bummed out when I ding a previously un-dinged Rick. But this product seems a little extreme:
http://cgi.ebay.com/AxeGlove-Guitar-Pro ... dZViewItem
The AxeGlove Guitar Protection System?!
Or...wear it down low...not as easy to play, but the ladies will definitely notice. Just ask Jimmy Page, or refer to Capt. Sandwich's avatar...rikk wrote:Just wear your bass up high, and no worry about buckle rash. Easier to play as well.
Another DPT classic one liner....wayang wrote:
(If this leads to a different kind of rash, however, you're on your own...)