Model Of The Week 9.5: The BIG One -- The 4003

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: Model of the Week Nine: The BIG one -- the 4003

Post by cassius987 »

Yours appears to have aged into "true" AFG... nice!
User avatar
Lost Coyotes
Intermediate Member
Posts: 900
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: Model of the Week Nine: The BIG one -- the 4003

Post by Lost Coyotes »

iamthebassman wrote:My '80 4003, gotta be one of the earliest lefty 4003s, I would think.
Image
Image
Image
And a darn nice FG, Ron!
"Why didn't I just learn how to cook"
User avatar
thx1955
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2824
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: Model of the Week Nine: The BIG one -- the 4003

Post by thx1955 »

Here's my 1996 Fireglo 4003

Image
"It's Red Jim, but not as we know it...."
User avatar
berth
RRF Consultant
Posts: 1723
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 7:06 am
Contact:

Re: Model of the Week Nine: The BIG one -- the 4003

Post by berth »

I came to the conclusion that I dont have any normal (non BT) 4003's. :oops:
User avatar
qwezirider
Intermediate Member
Posts: 850
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 5:43 pm
Contact:

Re: Model of the Week Nine: The BIG one -- the 4003

Post by qwezirider »

Here are a couple. First, my 2005 4003JG, no longer mine:
4003-006.jpg
4003-008.jpg
And my current 4003PFB (pretty freakin' black, since it cannot be None More Black 8) )...
PFB-003.jpg
PFB-005.jpg
I no longer (for many years now) have my very first, a 1986 4003FG. After seeing all these nice amberings, I sure wish I did still have it.
User avatar
1965
Advanced Member
Posts: 1607
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2008 11:01 pm

Re: Model of the Week Nine: The BIG one -- the 4003

Post by 1965 »

rickfan60 wrote:
1965 wrote:
rickfan60 wrote:I left out the C64 and the C64S models which are also based on the 4003
Huh? That makes no sense, they're totally different.
They are variations on the same theme.
Well, they're the same shape (roughly), other than that they have different: headstocks, inlays, pickups, electronics, binding yes/no, pickguards, knobs. They might be made the same with CNC, but what does that have to do with it?
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: Model of the Week Nine: The BIG one -- the 4003

Post by johnallg »

cjj wrote:May 1984 Mapleglo... exquisite!
4003_body.jpg
4003_body_back.jpg
Hmm, looks familiar...
CJ, do you realize how close you came to not owning that bass? Twice I have been tempted - Steve almost didn't get it either. She is a beauty. If I hadn't gotten the V63, this bass would have been mine. Enjoy.
User avatar
cjj
RRF Moderator
Posts: 10931
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:17 pm
Contact:

Re: Model of the Week Nine: The BIG one -- the 4003

Post by cjj »

johnallg wrote:
cjj wrote:May 1984 Mapleglo... exquisite!
4003_body.jpg
4003_body_back.jpg
Hmm, looks familiar...
CJ, do you realize how close you came to not owning that bass? Twice I have been tempted - Steve almost didn't get it either. She is a beauty. If I hadn't gotten the V63, this bass would have been mine. Enjoy.
Yeah, I can understand. I missed it by just a tad the first time it showed up, Steve beat me out that time, but I guess I got it en the end, just cost a bit more. :lol:

It's not likely to be available anytime soon though! :mrgreen:
I have NO idea what to do with those skinny stringed things... I'm just a bass player...
User avatar
tmossman
Member
Posts: 492
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 4:58 am

Re: Model of the Week Nine: The BIG one -- the 4003

Post by tmossman »

1965 wrote:Well, they're the same shape (roughly), other than that they have different: headstocks, inlays, pickups, electronics, binding yes/no, pickguards, knobs. They might be made the same with CNC, but what does that have to do with it?
I think it has more to do with the truss rods than anything else. The C basses are made using the current 4003 construction methods therefore people tend to think of them as 4003 variants rather than 4001s.
rickfan60
Senior Member
Posts: 5395
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:00 am

Re: Model of the Week Nine: The BIG one -- the 4003

Post by rickfan60 »

1965 wrote: Well, they're the same shape (roughly), other than that they have different: headstocks, inlays, pickups, electronics, binding yes/no, pickguards, knobs. They might be made the same with CNC, but what does that have to do with it?

You are talking about mostly cosmetic differences. The underlying bass is the same. The headstock is merely reversed and there is some model-specific hardware like the treble pickup and the nickel plated tuners, and the lefty-look TRC. The C64 body should be pretty much the same shape as a 4003 from the same year. The C64S is slightly different to reflect the overzealous sanding job applied by Macca once upon a time. I don't know if the inlays are different from the vinyl dots used in the 4003S models. Otherwise pretty much every other part will fit neatly into a standard 4003. The electronics include the .0047 cap which was also part of the original 4003.
User avatar
bosco64
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 904
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2000 5:49 am
Contact:

Re: Model of the Week Nine: The BIG one -- the 4003

Post by bosco64 »

My Blueburst 4003 (one of the earliest ones) before I bought it:
Rick-054003BluBrst.jpg
"Keep smiling, keep your mouth shut, and nobody gets hurt!" :mrgreen:
Don't bust Mike's chops...
'05 4003 BBR; '99 4001V63 FG; '96 4003S Trans Blue (custom refin from Paul W.)
User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13197
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Re: Model of the Week Nine: The BIG one -- the 4003

Post by rickenbrother »

That's a pretty Blueburst, Ron! :D
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
User avatar
bosco64
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 904
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2000 5:49 am
Contact:

Re: Model of the Week Nine: The BIG one -- the 4003

Post by bosco64 »

Thanks Joey! :D
"Keep smiling, keep your mouth shut, and nobody gets hurt!" :mrgreen:
Don't bust Mike's chops...
'05 4003 BBR; '99 4001V63 FG; '96 4003S Trans Blue (custom refin from Paul W.)
User avatar
nov_1981
Member
Posts: 251
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 5:02 pm

Re: Model of the Week Nine: The BIG one -- the 4003

Post by nov_1981 »

rickfan60 wrote:You do have a lovely collection Paul. What nice colors too.

There are several major groupings in the 4003 family. The first ones had the old style rods but were adjusted at the body, as Paul said. The necks were made on rectangular blanks that some times have 3 part laminations like the 70's 4001s but instead of shedua center lams they have maple ones. They also share the D shaped neck, the smaller headstock of the 70's 4001 and the 70's 7.25" fingerboard radius. After a while the neck blanks were reduced just two pieces. The electronics were pretty much the same as the 4001.

The next group started about August of '84 when the new style truss rod system was introduced. These also have split guards and body end adjusters but the neck blanks are one piece and tapered . That is, they are wider at the end button than they are at the headstock. The headstock increased in size around this time and gained wider wings (ears?) similar to the 60's basses. The tailpiece gained two extra screws to prevent "lift" and the pickups got a little hotter and the fingerboard was flattened out to a 10" radius.

The next group started in about '86 when the truss adjusters were moved back to the headstock (where they belong :D ). The 4003 platform took on some alternate forms with the introduction of the 4003S/5, the 4003S/8, and the V63. Several interesting limited edition 4003s appeared that include the Shadow, the SPC Black Star, the Tuxedo, and the Redneck. The .00047 cap was removed from the circuit around this time giving the 4003 a much deeper voice.

The next major group starts sometime in the early 90's when the bodies were first cut by CNC. At that time the upper horn took on a more slender and elegant appearance. The pickups got another boost in power and the molded plastic bobbin replaced the resin board / drive screw assemblies of the previous 2 decades.

The 21st century 4003s gained a little more pickup punch but lost the 4003S/5 and 4003S/8 options. Two different neck profiles and headstock shapes appeared. Walnut head wings (ears?) were added at around 2006. The pull pot was added to allow the .00047 cap to be cut into the tone circuit and the pickups gained adjustable pole pieces. My favorite change is the addition of the full width inlays. There was also the limited edition 4003 DCM made for the 75th Anniversary.

Did I leave anything out?
Great Info Ted

Along the lines of the evolution of the 4003
I'm interested to know when the fret gage changed
from the smaller 4001 like gage to the larger.

Did the 4003 always have the larger frets?

Big difference in the feel and sound IMHO
rickfan60
Senior Member
Posts: 5395
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:00 am

Re: Model of the Week Nine: The BIG one -- the 4003

Post by rickfan60 »

That is a good question and something I should have included. I think the fret wire changed sometime in the early 90's. I own examples from '81, '85', '86', '87, and '88 all of which have the small wire but as we know RIC changes are usually gradual. My '93 and '94 both have the larger wire (I think it is #149). So the 4003 came with the smaller size for probably the fist 10 years.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”