ben_brown wrote:Who's the guy in Japan who has and gigs a very good condition RM1999?
He has a 64. In excellent shape, too. Always nice to see eye candy in his posts.
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
ben_brown wrote:Who's the guy in Japan who has and gigs a very good condition RM1999?
That would be Atsushi.ben_brown wrote:Who's the guy in Japan who has and gigs a very good condition RM1999?
So I believed until JH said that they were never sandcast.....rickfan60 wrote:casting process which was done in sand.
weemac wrote:
So I believed until JH said that they were never sandcast.....
Have a look here:
viewtopic.php?f=12&t=385282&p=488343&hi ... st#p488343
As near as I can make out they may have been gravity diecast...
Hopefully JH will chime in again and really clear up the mystery..
Eden.
I'd have to go with those guys personally Ted. If it was just one of them it's debatable, but when it's 3, and they were there at the time....rickfan60 wrote:weemac wrote:
So I believed until JH said that they were never sandcast.....
Have a look here:
viewtopic.php?f=12&t=385282&p=488343&hi ... st#p488343
As near as I can make out they may have been gravity diecast...
Hopefully JH will chime in again and really clear up the mystery..
Eden.
Jeez, I don't know then. Three people who worked in the factory back then told me the same story about pressing molds into sand.

Agreed, but I'm just talking about general appearance. Let's see yoursrickfan60 wrote:I don't think you will find many that look alike. The one on my '63 does not look like either of those. I am pretty sure there was some hand-trimming in the process.
There are more; just look at Squire's RM1999 for a third shape.1965 wrote:So is the consensus that there are two types of 1999 HS surround? or are there more?