oh great faker!

Vintage, Modern, V & C Series, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
whojamfan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2552
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 10:50 am
Contact:

Re: oh great faker!

Post by whojamfan »

Wow, that's a lot of money for that guitar. Love it, hate it, sue it, whatever floats your boat. It's really about what inspires you to play innit?
User avatar
epitreture
Member
Posts: 381
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 10:35 am

Re: oh great faker!

Post by epitreture »

donnellbw wrote:
It seems that there is a certain intolerant prejudice (the Copyright issue aside) among the RIC purists that borders on arrogance. Are people really defining part of their lives by a
certain blend of wood and metal parts that come from Santa Ana only? I think that this snobby negative derision of "lessor" brands reveals an insecurity in some players that bears
some introspection.
I couldn't agree with you more. All we're talking about is wood and metal. Yes, Rickenbackers look and sound good, but if you ever look at those pictures from any of the Rick confluences you'll mostly just see middle age white guys who still have a "Beatle fantasy". And there's nothing wrong with that. Hell, I've got seven Ricks myself, but I have other guitars that sound just as good and cost a lot less and have no connection with those four mop tops. There are way too many Rick snobs.
User avatar
Scastles
Senior Member
Posts: 3278
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 11:19 am
Contact:

Re: oh great faker!

Post by Scastles »

epitreture wrote:
donnellbw wrote:
It seems that there is a certain intolerant prejudice (the Copyright issue aside) among the RIC purists that borders on arrogance. Are people really defining part of their lives by a
certain blend of wood and metal parts that come from Santa Ana only? I think that this snobby negative derision of "lessor" brands reveals an insecurity in some players that bears
some introspection.
I couldn't agree with you more. All we're talking about is wood and metal. Yes, Rickenbackers look and sound good, but if you ever look at those pictures from any of the Rick confluences you'll mostly just see middle age white guys who still have a "Beatle fantasy". And there's nothing wrong with that. Hell, I've got seven Ricks myself, but I have other guitars that sound just as good and cost a lot less and have no connection with those four mop tops. There are way too many Rick snobs.
I suppose we could all have a little snoberry in ourselves, for one thing or another. Just like some people have a tendency to classify others without even knowing who they are or what they're about.
User avatar
lovecity
Junior Member
Posts: 100
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 3:50 pm

Re: oh great faker!

Post by lovecity »

epitreture wrote:
donnellbw wrote: but if you ever look at those pictures from any of the Rick confluences you'll mostly just see middle age white guys who still have a "Beatle fantasy".

Hell, I've got seven Ricks myself, but I have other guitars that sound just as good and cost a lot less and have no connection with those four mop tops. There are way too many Rick snobs.
Amen.
User avatar
jimk
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5355
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 7:27 am
Contact:

Re: oh great faker!

Post by jimk »

lovecity wrote:
epitreture wrote:
donnellbw wrote: but if you ever look at those pictures from any of the Rick confluences you'll mostly just see middle age white guys who still have a "Beatle fantasy".

Hell, I've got seven Ricks myself, but I have other guitars that sound just as good and cost a lot less and have no connection with those four mop tops. There are way too many Rick snobs.
Amen.
Oh please sir! Can I have one to surgery, sir? :mrgreen:

JimK
User avatar
beatlefreak
Senior Member
Posts: 6160
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:45 am
Contact:

Re: oh great faker!

Post by beatlefreak »

donnellbw wrote:It seems that there is a certain intolerant prejudice (the Copyright issue aside) among the RIC purists that borders on arrogance.
I can't speak for others, but for me the issue is the trademark / trade dress (not copyright) issue - period. It never ceases to amaze me how so many people think it's OK to just copy the designs owned by someone else. And not only that, but many of them feel it's their right to do so. Just stop and think it over - If you owned a unique design (for anything), and were marketing it. Then someone came along, copied your design and started selling it. How would you feel? It's just plain wrong - It's theft.
donnellbw wrote:I think that this snobby negative derision of "lessor" brands reveals an insecurity in some players that bears
some introspection.
I feel that the snobby "What does it hurt to make copies?" attitude of some players should bear even closer introspection. I wouldn't own a Rick copy, and I don't like seeing them. But then, I've never liked the Gibson or Fender copies, and wouldn't own one of them either.
donnellbw wrote:I remember reading a post way back where someone had seen McGuinn live at a club. He said that Roger played nice crackly, sparkly electric 12 and enthralled the room. Come to find out Roger was playing a Guild 12 - but nobody threw him out because it wasn't a RIC!
I doubt that the Guild was masquerading as a Rickenbacker.
Last edited by beatlefreak on Mon Feb 02, 2009 1:51 am, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
carr
Member
Posts: 274
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2001 2:17 pm

Re: oh great faker!

Post by carr »

I dont normally comment on fake rics but this looked so bad I couldnt help myself. If it sounds great Maybe it could be played in a big brown paper bag?

J
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: oh great faker!

Post by jingle_jangle »

Kris covers this pretty well, here.

There's some confusion about "snobbery" in this context. At its simplest, this is an issue of trademark infringement and intellectual property theft.

This has been approached dozens of times and in hundreds of posts. Anyone thinking that this is "snobbery" would do well to use the SEARCH feature and do some reading up on this topic before making accusations of fellow Forumites.

In any event, this thing is butt-ugly. These 360 copies always are. I've got a file folder filled with them; not one nice one in the bunch.

Is anyone discussing the arrogance it takes to do a bad (illegal) copy of a legendary (protected) design, or to offer one for sale with claims that the counterfeit looks/plays/sounds better than the original? This is theft, plain and simple, coupled with aesthetic confusion.
User avatar
gregga41
RRF Consultant
Posts: 1736
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 1:29 am
Contact:

Re: oh great faker!

Post by gregga41 »

epitreture wrote:
donnellbw wrote:
It seems that there is a certain intolerant prejudice (the Copyright issue aside) among the RIC purists that borders on arrogance. Are people really defining part of their lives by a
certain blend of wood and metal parts that come from Santa Ana only? I think that this snobby negative derision of "lessor" brands reveals an insecurity in some players that bears
some introspection.
I couldn't agree with you more. All we're talking about is wood and metal. Yes, Rickenbackers look and sound good, but if you ever look at those pictures from any of the Rick confluences you'll mostly just see middle age white guys who still have a "Beatle fantasy". And there's nothing wrong with that. Hell, I've got seven Ricks myself, but I have other guitars that sound just as good and cost a lot less and have no connection with those four mop tops. There are way too many Rick snobs.
Well then, don't look at the pictures! And i hope you win the auction! It's all yours!
This guitar doesn't even fit under the title "lessor" brands.
Come down to Oz and have a beer with us snobs!
User avatar
carr
Member
Posts: 274
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2001 2:17 pm

Re: oh great faker!

Post by carr »

Ive got chinese strat copy called Manito and it plays real well and apart from the name on the headstock you would think it is a fender. Good looks and great sound.

The fake ric fails at the first fence .It looks like someone tried to make it from memory.
User avatar
rick_ovic
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2450
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 4:29 pm
Contact:

Re: oh great faker!

Post by rick_ovic »

You know, it's funny, I was reading this thread while I was strumming my '69 Gibson SG Special, watching the thread follow the typical "Rickenfaker" course.

Some one usually steps in and suggests how the faker ought to be burned / smashed / stuck in a blender / jettisoned into outer space.

Next come the "hey, it's not so bad / why all the fuss / who's it going to hurt / it probably sounds okay" comments by others.

At this point other Forum members attempt to explain (again) why the Rickenbacker trademark infringement issue is important and why RIC goes to great lengths to enforce it's rights in protecting the trademarks it owns. It really has nothing to do with snobbery or arrogance at all. If you spend the time to understand this topic, and to really appreciate just how hard and how resolute RIC pursues those who create Rickenfakers, you'd understand why many of us would like to see Rickenfakers banished.

Having attended a number of confluences on both sides of the US and facilitated a few held here in Australia, my observations about the attendees are:-

1. They have a shared passion for Rickenbacker guitars and the Rickenbacker brand.
2. Most play and continue to own other brands of guitars. I have a number of Fenders and Gibsons in my collection.
3. Most share a love of Beatles music, just like 80% of the western population. :D
4. Melissa, Kira, Alisha, Diane, Tammy, Robyn, Sarah, Alison (all Forum members) and the partners of other male Forum members, who join in the fun at Rickenbacker confluences, would probably disagree with the "middle aged white guy Beatle fantasy" description. :mrgreen:
5. For most attendees, the friendships and relationships which are fostered at confluences become just as important, if not more important, as the passion for Rickenbacker guitars.

I would encourage anyone who has not yet been to a confluence to make the effort to attend one if at all possible, and you'll see what I mean. They're not exclusive events....just the opposite...they are very inclusive and it really doesn't matter whether you own one, or two , or twenty or fifty or zero Rickenbackers, you'll still be welcome. :mrgreen:
'59 425, '59 335, '60 335, '60 360, '60 335F, '60 345F, '64 RM 1999, '65 RM 1998, '65 360-12, '66 335, '67 450-12, '72 4001 '72 4001, '75 4000, '75 4000CS, '00 700S, '01 700C, '01 700S-12, '01 730S-FH, '06 660 DCM
User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13194
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Re: oh great faker!

Post by rickenbrother »

Great post, Trotty! :wink:
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
User avatar
grazioso
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1076
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 8:41 pm
Contact:

Re: oh great faker!

Post by grazioso »

I AM NOT middle aged ...yet ! :twisted: AND i have absolutely no beatles fantasy going! as a matter of fact i am not much fan of beatles music - there i said it.
dusan palka who is also known as grazioso on infamous auction web site
if you want to reach the man and expect an answer please make sure you remove this email address ([email protected]) from your spam block if you have one.
User avatar
freshmattyp
Member
Posts: 238
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 6:51 am
Contact:

Re: oh great faker!

Post by freshmattyp »

Did I miss the part where someone came out in this discussion and said fakes were OK? I don't think that's been the case.

Maybe once Jim's Rick gets here, we can have a 2 man Kansas City confluence.
User avatar
jimk
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5355
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 7:27 am
Contact:

Re: oh great faker!

Post by jimk »

Yeah! Let's have a K.C. area confluence. And I'm middle aged, and don't have a Beatles fantasy thang goin' either. (Do love their music, though) I just wanna plug in for a change and have [some more] fun. :wink: :mrgreen:

JimK
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: by John Simmons”