Mistaken identity on the bay

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
doctorwho
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 12659
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 3:28 pm

Post by doctorwho »

Just an update: the seller did listen to reason and changed the wording in the ad. Not all misguded eBay sellers are scam artists!
It is better, of course, to know useless things than to know nothing. - Seneca
ghs_boomer
Junior Member
Posts: 174
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2004 6:00 am

Post by ghs_boomer »

Ok, at the risk of sounding "Stupid", whats the difference between a 4003 and a V63?
I know this sounds stupid but i've been playing Ricks for over 20 years and i just thought of them as as 4001's or 4003's. I guess i never did any research on them so please excuse my ignorance.
User avatar
jwilli
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4327
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2000 8:45 pm

Post by jwilli »

Mike, don't worry you are most likely in the majority of RIC owners, lol. We're the "anal" ones. That being said, I'll let someone else explain the differences..........
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

The difference between a 4003 and a 4001v63 ...

The 4001v63 is a re-issue ... it's not a real 4001 ... it doesn't have the old truss rod system, or the old capaciter, but it does have the old toaster pickup ...

the 4003 and the 4001v63 share the modern neck ... the 4003 has ric-o-sound, binding, and triangular inlays. the v63 is an "s" model ... mono, no binding, and dot inlays ...

So the main difference is the pickups and a few cosmetic features
User avatar
jnbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 5359
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2001 7:58 am

Post by jnbass »

and as evidenced by the 'bay, a rabid following of buyers-all with GAS...

IMHO
Buy it before someone else does
rictified
Senior Member
Posts: 8040
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 5:00 am

Post by rictified »

It has a modernized version of the horseshoe pickup also.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”