He got his answer from years ago - When I'm 64.ricosound wrote:...not!!!!!!paul_yan wrote:...living together in perfect harmony...

Ha! Just saw your post, Bobcat!

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
He got his answer from years ago - When I'm 64.ricosound wrote:...not!!!!!!paul_yan wrote:...living together in perfect harmony...
At least he has his bandmates . . .johnallg wrote:He got his answer from years ago - When I'm 64.ricosound wrote:...not!!!!!!paul_yan wrote:...living together in perfect harmony...
Ha! Just saw your post, Bobcat!
Short scale maybe, but 32" medium scale would definitely get my attention. Long enough to still have good bottom end resonance but short enough to be very comfortable to play. Make it "Plain Jane" ala the "s" models, no body/neck binding and dot markers. I might even break the bank and take two, one in MG and one in FG.beefandbones wrote:I would love to see a regular RM 1999 reissue too, or a V68, or a brand new model (short scale?), but I think that's unlikely, since the recent trend has been toward streamlining rather than introducing new models.
IIRC, the Stanley Clarke Alembics are 30.75" scale.aceonbass wrote:Stanley Clark's Alembics are all 32" scale with light strings, and we all know how good he sounds. If you really want a 32" scale Rick bass, I can get it done for you.
Jim, this is why Ben posted to be ready to flip out - NO MORE FIREGLO!!!thx1955 wrote:As long as they make a FIreglo one I'm good whenever the new model arrives, I would like to see sparklies and Chequered binding again though !
aceonbass wrote:Maybe Ben meant they were going to flip the body this time.