Did they really make a short scale 4003?

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: Did they really make a short scale 4003?

Post by aceonbass »

The Schaller bridge from the 4004's won't work. They cannot be adjusted narrow enough for the 4003's fairly tight spacing. The best way to do a 32" scale 4003 is to plane off the fretboard, cut the headstock off on a scarf joint, remove 1 1/4" from the neck's length using the same angle cut as well as the same distance from the truss rods,, and re-attach the headstock. This would be followed by a new fretboard. To scale the entire instrument down by 10% would be kinda OCD.
DanJ
New member
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:51 am

Re: Did they really make a short scale 4003?

Post by DanJ »

Points all well taken - thanks!

I was, however, thinking in terms of a freshly made instrument, not a modified one. My issue with simply shortening the neck, especially all the way down to 30" short scale, is that that the body and headstock end up looking oversized in relation to the smaller neck length. Obsessive-compulsive? Perhaps, but everyone has their own sense of aesthetics.

I have seen plenty examples of short scale basses that simply do not look right. The Gibson SG style basses come to mind. Those came in both short and full scales. The short scale ones IMO look dumpy. If I were to see an example of a Rick modified to 32" scale in the manner you described, I could better decide if it looks okay to me. Might there be one such instrument out there?

Although I suspect now that I know the answer, I nevertheless reiterate my original question: Did the short scale Rick's mentioned in this thread have smaller bodies?
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: Did they really make a short scale 4003?

Post by aceonbass »

The short scale 4003's had the same body wings , but shorter neck blanks. They also had the bridge moved up a bit, which I didn't care for. The short scale 3000's had shorter bodies than their 3001 counterparts and 21 fret necks. As far as freshly made instruments go, Alembic and Birdsong guitars make short scale instruments of quality.
DanJ
New member
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:51 am

Re: Did they really make a short scale 4003?

Post by DanJ »

Yup, that relocated bridge does not look right. That is at the heart of my interest in a completely redesigned instrument, rather than an existing one modified in that manner. I am aware of both Alembic and Birdsong, but I doubt that either of those companies would build me a medium scale "Rick," which is what I am after, if only in my dreams. LOL!

P.S. FWIW my favorite bass, up until my recently acquired 4000, has been an original Fender Urge from the '90's which has a 32" scale (The current Urge II is 34" scale.). Love the feel and sound of it, but hey it ain't a Rick now is it? I'm getting used to the 33.25" scale, but can't help thinking how cool a medium scale Rick would be.
JakeK
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5757
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:08 pm

Re: Did they really make a short scale 4003?

Post by JakeK »

Isn't the Höfner 500/1 a short scale bass of quality?
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37336
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Did they really make a short scale 4003?

Post by jps »

JakeK wrote:Isn't the Höfner 500/1 a short scale bass of quality?
Yes. :D
DanJ
New member
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:51 am

Re: Did they really make a short scale 4003?

Post by DanJ »

Depending on who you are and what you are into, the German Hofner "Beatle Bass" is either an overpriced item or a work of art worth every penny it costs. I happen to be a Beatlemaniac, so guess what? LOL!

My Hofner is the Contemporary (CT) 500/1. It is manufactured in China to Hofner's specifications. It is virtually identical to the German model, except that the CT has a solid center block in the body. It also is much more affordable - currently about $769 compared to around $1900 for the German model.

I owned a German Hofner for a while but got rid of it because it didn't lend itself to all the music our band played. The CT, however, largely because of the solid center block, lends itself to a greater range of styles. I highly recommend the CT if you want the Beatle vibe but need to play more than just Beatles/British Invasion music. I keep mine strung with roundwounds, .040 - .095 as per the factory specifications.

If Rickenbacker were to ever offer an affordable, good quality, foreign built alternative to their domestic line, this could be the place to include a medium or short scale version of the 4000 series bass.
User avatar
iamthebassman
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2415
Joined: Tue May 28, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: Did they really make a short scale 4003?

Post by iamthebassman »

JakeK wrote:Isn't the Höfner 500/1 a short scale bass of quality?
High price does NOT equal high quality!
User avatar
peewee
Intermediate Member
Posts: 881
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2007 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: Did they really make a short scale 4003?

Post by peewee »

JakeK wrote:Isn't the Höfner 500/1 a short scale bass of quality?
Love both of mine! I've a Vintage '62 and a Vintage '63. The workmanship on both of these basses is first rate and the figure of the flamed maple on the '63 blows most Les Paul reissues out of the water. Both differ in terms of tone with the '62 having a bit more clarity than the '63 and sounds closer to McCartney's bass overall. I'll most likely put the '63 up on the market as it's not getting much play these days. Still looking for a nice early run 4001V63 as well. If RIC ever decided to start making a 4000 series in 30" scale as a regular product, I'd be all over that!
Wherever you go, there you are
User avatar
teb
Advanced Member
Posts: 1534
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 7:39 pm

Re: Did they really make a short scale 4003?

Post by teb »

The 350-style body shape like I used on my modified 2030 would make a really nice short-scale bass. This is an instance where I actually remembered to plan ahead and measure the case before building the body, and to get it to fit in there, the bridge (Schaller) had to be moved way back to the end of the body. A couple inches farther forward and a slightly shorter neck would have looked about the same. The 4001/4003 shape strikes me as one that is too nice to mess with, but build a short-scale, 350-style, non-bolt-on, toaster-equipped model and you would have one hell of a nice, high-end bass. Even with the bolt-on neck and 2030 electronics, this one is a really nice instrument that both plays and sounds excellent. One of these days I'll stumble on a 3000 when I happen to have money to blow and I have a big slab of figured maple wide enough to do the body just waiting.
Attachments
jf-007x.jpg
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37336
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Did they really make a short scale 4003?

Post by jps »

DanJ wrote:I highly recommend the CT if you want the Beatle vibe but need to play more than just Beatles/British Invasion music.
:shock: :shock: :shock: I have a 500/1V63 and play The Who, Foreigner, 3 Doors Down, Anberlin, etc. on it! 8) 8) 8)
User avatar
teb
Advanced Member
Posts: 1534
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 7:39 pm

Re: Did they really make a short scale 4003?

Post by teb »

I have one too, and it's a lot more versatile than people give it credit for. It's able to sit nicely in the mix when recording and doesn't call a lot of attention to itself, tone-wise, but it provides a very solid foundation. It's also pretty good for bluegrass (especially British Invasion bluegrass :)).
User avatar
godber
Advanced Member
Posts: 2650
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 11:07 am

Re: Did they really make a short scale 4003?

Post by godber »

jps wrote:
DanJ wrote:I highly recommend the CT if you want the Beatle vibe but need to play more than just Beatles/British Invasion music.
:shock: :shock: :shock: I have a 500/1V63 and play The Who, Foreigner, 3 Doors Down, Anberlin, etc. on it! 8) 8) 8)
I've got a 500/1V62 here - ska and dubby reggae sound great too! :D
User avatar
godber
Advanced Member
Posts: 2650
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 11:07 am

Re: Did they really make a short scale 4003?

Post by godber »

Any views here on the Gibson SG bass "re-issue"? I like the look of them, but haven't been able to get my hands on one.
User avatar
peewee
Intermediate Member
Posts: 881
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2007 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: Did they really make a short scale 4003?

Post by peewee »

godber wrote:
jps wrote:
DanJ wrote:I highly recommend the CT if you want the Beatle vibe but need to play more than just Beatles/British Invasion music.
:shock: :shock: :shock: I have a 500/1V63 and play The Who, Foreigner, 3 Doors Down, Anberlin, etc. on it! 8) 8) 8)
I've got a 500/1V62 here - ska and dubby reggae sound great too! :D
Worked well enough for Robbie Shakespear, didn't it?
Wherever you go, there you are
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”