E String - 100 vs. 105

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
spongebob
Intermediate Member
Posts: 502
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 6:32 am

E String - 100 vs. 105

Post by spongebob »

I'm looking to try some different strings..

Research on the forum has highlighted the D'addario EXL-170's, which seemingly come fitted to some new Rics.

However, I've always used a 105 gauge E string, whereas the 170's are 100.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't Rics come fitted with 45-105? If so, does the 100 gauge E suit the sound of the Ric better? I suppose I'm worried about it sounding a little thin!

Sorry to add to the string debate, but I've just gotta ask! :oops: :oops:
1974 (February) 4001 JG
User avatar
qwezirider
Intermediate Member
Posts: 850
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 5:43 pm
Contact:

Re: E String - 100 vs. 105

Post by qwezirider »

I use .085-.090 (depending upon whether I'm using a 4 or 5 string set) and have no thinness issues on the E string.
User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13206
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Re: E String - 100 vs. 105

Post by rickenbrother »

I've been using the D'Addario EXL-170 and stainless steel sets of the same gauge for about the past 28 years. It's set that I like best at a reasonable price. I've never found the .100" E string to sound thin. Before that, I always used the Rotosound Swing Bass set which had a .105" E string. When I switched to the D'Addario sets, I was much more satisfied with their tone, especially the E string.
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
User avatar
ram
Senior Member
Posts: 3743
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 2:55 pm

Re: E String - 100 vs. 105

Post by ram »

I'm in the same boat as Joey... decades of 170's and no complaints. E, A, D & G all sound great! I have tried heavier and lighter strings over the years but the XL170s is what sound/feel the best to me.
User avatar
antonius
Member
Posts: 256
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 6:15 am

Re: E String - 100 vs. 105

Post by antonius »

I use DR Hi-Beam 40-60-80-100 and the E string sounds plenty thick enough for me, with a nice balance between all four strings. Completely different brand of string I know but just adding my opinion on .100 E stings... I'm sure there will be subtle differences between guages and for sure personal taste and subjective perceptions will come into it. But it can't hurt to try something different...
rickfan60
Senior Member
Posts: 5395
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:00 am

Re: E String - 100 vs. 105

Post by rickfan60 »

I always used 40-100 sets until recently switching to 45-105s on some of my basses. I like the stiffer feel of the heavier strings and find them easier to control. In my experience, both sets work fine on Ricks.
User avatar
Mossman
New member
Posts: 59
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 10:16 am

Re: E String - 100 vs. 105

Post by Mossman »

I prefer a .100 E to .105.... The .105 feels a bit too stiff, and sounds a little tubby and not as well defined to me.
ivan
New member
Posts: 72
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 10:26 am

Re: E String - 100 vs. 105

Post by ivan »

Mossman wrote:I prefer a .100 E to .105.... The .105 feels a bit too stiff, and sounds a little tubby and not as well defined to me.
+1
User avatar
Becky
New member
Posts: 47
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 11:08 am

Re: E String - 100 vs. 105

Post by Becky »

For what it's worth, I'm using Rotosound Swing Bass in 43-65-80-110, and I like them a lot.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37498
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: E String - 100 vs. 105

Post by jps »

Becky wrote:For what it's worth, I'm using Rotosound Swing Bass in 43-65-80-110, and I like them a lot.
That's the BS signature set, right, Becky?
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: E String - 100 vs. 105

Post by cassius987 »

I switched over to 100's for my E string and I'm really glad I did. Whether TIs, D'Addarios, or DRs, I always go for (at maximum) 100-gauge E strings. Occasionally I hop down to 95 with my DR Nickel Sunbeams. I like the change in tone--seems a bit cleaner and more focused to me.
User avatar
VRICKY63
Intermediate Member
Posts: 899
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 2:31 am

Re: E String - 100 vs. 105

Post by VRICKY63 »

DR stainless Lowriders 40-100 . Wicked mean E string. Love it !
It's too early in the morning to talk about our relationship !
User avatar
badeggs
Intermediate Member
Posts: 865
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 5:04 am

Re: E String - 100 vs. 105

Post by badeggs »

Super Slinkies, 45-65-80-100...the best.
User avatar
woodyng
Senior Member
Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 11:11 am

Re: E String - 100 vs. 105

Post by woodyng »

using dr sunbeams 40-100 set...love em,i might like to get a 45-100 set,but overall i like the 100 for the e. i used a ghs progressive set with a 103 e on the 4002 which worked really well. i've got 40-100 ghs flats on my dano.
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: E String - 100 vs. 105

Post by johnallg »

Just have 3 Ricks, one with a .095, one with a .100, and one with a .105! :twisted:

I use and prefer the .100 for all the same reasons as stated.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”