Rickenbacker Solid Body Electric Bass , c. 1935

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
User avatar
paologregorio
Senior Member
Posts: 6376
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Rickenbacker Solid Body Electric Bass , c. 1935

Post by paologregorio »

Amazingly far ahead of its time. Rickenbacker made similarly modern space age violins back then as well.,
User avatar
tomersg
New member
Posts: 68
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 6:01 am

Re: Rickenbacker Solid Body Electric Bass , c. 1935

Post by tomersg »

Very nice! and it would be interesting to see some kind of reissue for that EUB. something like the Warwick triumph which is a reissue of the Framus Triumph bass.
User avatar
cjj
RRF Moderator
Posts: 10932
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:17 pm
Contact:

Re: Rickenbacker Solid Body Electric Bass , c. 1935

Post by cjj »

One of these was on ebay a year or so ago. Seems to me it went for around $10k.
I have NO idea what to do with those skinny stringed things... I'm just a bass player...
User avatar
jdogric12
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 10925
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 6:00 am

Re: Rickenbacker Solid Body Electric Bass , c. 1935

Post by jdogric12 »

Got to see AND HEAR some of those old instruments at the Guitar Geek festival this January. It was really cool to hear an all-Rick-Bakelite band.
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: Rickenbacker Solid Body Electric Bass , c. 1935

Post by jingle_jangle »

This is a landmark and timeless example of reducing a product to its absolute essentials, yet maintaining its character and function.
crbassweb.jpg
3628_01.jpg
User avatar
FretlessOnly
Advanced Member
Posts: 1605
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 9:00 pm

Re: Rickenbacker Solid Body Electric Bass , c. 1935

Post by FretlessOnly »

As an upright player, I'm very impressed by this. I wonder how the "tripod" would work with foot positions and all. I'd probably angle my left foot in the "V of the base of the tripod. I've got to get me one of these...
Can we have everything louder than everything else?
User avatar
kiramdear
RRF Moderator
Posts: 9045
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 2:51 am
Contact:

Re: Rickenbacker Solid Body Electric Bass , c. 1935

Post by kiramdear »

I'm stunned to discover this. I had no idea there were designs like this so far back. 8) 8) 8)
All I wanna do is rock!
User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13218
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Re: Rickenbacker Solid Body Electric Bass , c. 1935

Post by rickenbrother »

jingle_jangle wrote:This is a landmark and timeless example of reducing a product to its absolute essentials, yet maintaining its character and function.
It's a help with the function of carting it around. As nice as a traditional double bass is, they can be a pain to haul around if you have a small car.
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
User avatar
badeggs
Intermediate Member
Posts: 865
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 5:04 am

Re: Rickenbacker Solid Body Electric Bass , c. 1935

Post by badeggs »

The section on these instruments in the Smith book is great. There's one double bass that uses its own amp as a stand...

These were decades ahead of their time.
User avatar
jdogric12
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 10925
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 6:00 am

Re: Rickenbacker Solid Body Electric Bass , c. 1935

Post by jdogric12 »

rickenbrother wrote:
jingle_jangle wrote:This is a landmark and timeless example of reducing a product to its absolute essentials, yet maintaining its character and function.
It's a help with the function of carting it around. As nice as a traditional double bass is, they can be a pain to haul around if you have a small car.
Back in 2004 I bought a 1940 Kay M-1 bass that needed a neck joint repair to be playable without unreasonably high action. In other words, I could get notes out of it, but it was not really playable. I couldn't fit it in my car at the time (a '99 Mercury Tracer). It wasn't until getting my Prius in the fall of 2007 that I was able to fit it in the car and take it to be fixed. Now what I paid $500 for is worth about $2K!!! It's almost a shame I'll doubtfully ever sell it.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37509
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Rickenbacker Solid Body Electric Bass , c. 1935

Post by jps »

I used to have a NS Design CR4M, nice bass but it did not sound different enough from my Zon to justify keeping.
User avatar
kiramdear
RRF Moderator
Posts: 9045
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 2:51 am
Contact:

Re: Rickenbacker Solid Body Electric Bass , c. 1935

Post by kiramdear »

Nice pic of you, Jeff. I like the hands and face. 8)
All I wanna do is rock!
User avatar
berth
RRF Consultant
Posts: 1723
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 7:06 am
Contact:

Re: Rickenbacker Solid Body Electric Bass , c. 1935

Post by berth »

jps wrote:I used to have a NS Design CR4M, nice bass but it did not sound different enough from my Zon to justify keeping.
Watching your fingers you play it like it is your Zon (and not like a double bass). ;-)
68 4001|73 4001 MG|75 4000 MG|81 4001S AZG|86 4003 MID/BT|86 4003 Shadow|88 4003s Blackstar|89 4003 Grey/BT FL|93 4004 Ci|96 4003S/8 FG|98 4003S/5 JG|05 650D|05 4004Cii/5 TG|08 660/12 JG|18 4003S/5 MID|19 4003S/5 WAL ||TR35B|RB 30||
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37509
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Rickenbacker Solid Body Electric Bass , c. 1935

Post by jps »

After almost 4 decades of playing the little beasties makes it tough to do otherwise. :lol:
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”