Favorite Flats

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
espidog
Member
Posts: 422
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 2:26 am
Contact:

Re: Favorite Flats

Post by espidog »

I don't usually use flats at all, but recently I had a very good experience with Status "Hot Wire" Half-Wounds. They feel just as smooth and slinky as any flats but definitely have some of the growl and character more associated with roundwounds. AFAIK they're only available direct from Status themselves. They're by no means expensive, either. Find out more at their website:

http://www.status-graphite.com/
2004 4003 JetGlo
Epiphone Jack Casady
Ovation Magnum 1
Mania VTB-4BS
Dean Stylist w/ John Birch Magnum II pups
Yamaha BB414
Trace Elliot VA350/GP11 Mk1
Peavey TB-Raxx
2 BFM Omni 10.5 crossfire cabs
Roland Bass Cube 100
User avatar
kenf
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 202
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2001 8:05 am

Re: Favorite Flats

Post by kenf »

I forgot about Status flats! I had them on my Steinberger and liked them; I'd be willing to give them another try some day.

Ordering them to the US was painless, too.
650D, 660/12
Non-Ric: Precision 5, Sterling 4H, Stingray 5H, Bongo 5H, ThunderChief 5 x 2, L-1000, SG, Godin A6 & A12
"Rickenbacker?!?! You might as well be playing a tambourine!"
User avatar
Bighouse
Intermediate Member
Posts: 563
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 8:25 pm

Re: Favorite Flats

Post by Bighouse »

Hard to pick a favorite, but I'd have to go with B flat...though E flat comes in a very close second.
Because I told you before- oh, you can't do that.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37496
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Favorite Flats

Post by jps »

Bighouse wrote:Hard to pick a favorite, but I'd have to go with B flat...though E flat comes in a very close second.
I tend to do a lot more things in E♭. :wink:
User avatar
cjj
RRF Moderator
Posts: 10931
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:17 pm
Contact:

Re: Favorite Flats

Post by cjj »

I personally like E♭ minor...
I have NO idea what to do with those skinny stringed things... I'm just a bass player...
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: Favorite Flats

Post by jingle_jangle »

Favorite flats?

I had a nice 3-bedroom in Logan Square when I was in my early 20s.

Back when dinosaurs ruled the earth.
User avatar
Bighouse
Intermediate Member
Posts: 563
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 8:25 pm

Re: Favorite Flats

Post by Bighouse »

jingle_jangle wrote:Favorite flats?

I had a nice 3-bedroom in Logan Square when I was in my early 20s.

Back when dinosaurs ruled the earth.
HAHAHHA- and I thought I took it to a different place! Good one Paul! :lol: :lol:
Because I told you before- oh, you can't do that.
User avatar
cjj
RRF Moderator
Posts: 10931
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:17 pm
Contact:

Re: Favorite Flats

Post by cjj »

Bighouse wrote:
jingle_jangle wrote:Favorite flats?

I had a nice 3-bedroom in Logan Square when I was in my early 20s.

Back when dinosaurs ruled the earth.
HAHAHHA- and I thought I took it to a different place! Good one Paul! :lol: :lol:
Different place, huh? I've always thought these flats were pretty interesting:
Bonneville.jpg
Bonneville.jpg (11.61 KiB) Viewed 903 times
I have NO idea what to do with those skinny stringed things... I'm just a bass player...
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: Favorite Flats

Post by cassius987 »

I did some more research and found that a 45-60-80-105 set of D'A Chromes would have an incredibly low tension RSD of 4%... Lower than TIs which I thought were the lowest at 8%. This means the aforementioned D'A set would be extremely well-balanced and even-toned.
User avatar
wints
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6481
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2001 11:21 am

Re: Favorite Flats

Post by wints »

I've had 40-95 Chromes on my 73 FL for about 3 years now, and they still sound great. I then played Tony's C's/JDog's FL and that had TI's and they sounded awesome to me. I liked the feel too, and as a result will be changing over to them shortly.
jmceachern36
New member
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:30 pm

Re: Favorite Flats

Post by jmceachern36 »

cassius987 wrote:I did some more research and found that a 45-60-80-105 set of D'A Chromes would have an incredibly low tension RSD of 4%... Lower than TIs which I thought were the lowest at 8%. This means the aforementioned D'A set would be extremely well-balanced and even-toned.
Could you explain what RSD means? I've tried Chromes before (105-50) and not used them because of the high tension. I see you are mixing a set of Chromes to get less tension but I still don't see how they have less tension than TI's. I looked at the tensions on Juststrings......I use GHS flats right now (45-105). Love the tone but they are starting to sound very dead. I feel like they may be getting lost in the mix sometimes. Looking for an in between. Considering old dead rounds. TI's seem to lack balls for the lack of a better word. Your mixed Chromes could be nice but I don't want hi tension.......Or maybe I just need a second Ric with rounds.
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: Favorite Flats

Post by cassius987 »

Not less tension.. Better balance from string to string.

RSD=relative standard deviation.
jmceachern36
New member
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:30 pm

Re: Favorite Flats

Post by jmceachern36 »

cassius987 wrote:Not less tension.. Better balance from string to string.

RSD=relative standard deviation.
Ohhhh..... How's the tension feel on the custom set? A lot less than 50-105 set?
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37496
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Favorite Flats

Post by jps »

My custom 40-55-75-95 Chromes set is very even in tension and feel, sound great and last a long time. The tension is similar to TI JFs and are smoother that JFs but they are different enough that one should try both and decide which is best for them. I have both on various basses, but since no two are alike, I can't make a valid comparison between them, except to say I am extremely happy with both sets.

'67 4005WB - TIs
'98 4001V63 - Chromes
'08 4003 - TIs
'86 Yamaha BX-1 - Chromes
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: Favorite Flats

Post by cassius987 »

jmceachern36 wrote:
cassius987 wrote:Not less tension.. Better balance from string to string.

RSD=relative standard deviation.
Ohhhh..... How's the tension feel on the custom set? A lot less than 50-105 set?
A lot less.. Around ten pounds less for the set average.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”