New Dakota

Modern years of Rickenbacker Guitars from 1984 to the present

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
FretlessOnly
Advanced Member
Posts: 1605
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 9:00 pm

New Dakota

Post by FretlessOnly »

Here's the new 650 D:

Image

You may have noticed that I posted an issue in my original thread "Advice on Rick Guitars." The fingerboard has some damage, and I've also notice a grounding problem. RIC is going to take care of these.

But, truth be told, while I love this guitar, I'm not sure it's right for me. While I have been playing guitar for 32 years, I'm primarily a bass player, and an also an upright player to boot. When I grab an axe, I don't caress it, I choke it. So, with the jumbo frets, if I gently play a chord, the tuning is fine, but if I finger it the way my hand naturally fingers an instrument, it's horribly out of tune.

One solution might be heavy gauge strings. Say, 13s. Fine with me. Problem is, I need to send this back to RIC for warranty work, and I'm afraid that will void the warranty. I'd like to test this theory, but I don't want to void my warranty.

Any thoughts?

Are there any other RIC guitars without the jumbo frets but with the humbuckers? These are just great pickups!
Can we have everything louder than everything else?
User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 15123
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2000 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: New Dakota

Post by admin »

John: I think it is reasonable to try higher gauge strings. I would think that you would probably notice a difference with 12s but you may need a trussrod adjustment. This should not pose any problem for your warranty.
Life, as with music, often requires one to let go of the melody and listen to the rhythm

Please join the Official RickResource Forum Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/groups/379271585440277
User avatar
kenf
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 202
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2001 8:05 am

Re: New Dakota

Post by kenf »

John, give it some time. I'm 95% a bassist too, and I was able to adapt with no difficulty after a period of adjustment.
650D, 660/12
Non-Ric: Precision 5, Sterling 4H, Stingray 5H, Bongo 5H, ThunderChief 5 x 2, L-1000, SG, Godin A6 & A12
"Rickenbacker?!?! You might as well be playing a tambourine!"
User avatar
FretlessOnly
Advanced Member
Posts: 1605
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 9:00 pm

Re: New Dakota

Post by FretlessOnly »

Thanks Peter and Ken.

Peter: if I put 12s on it, could you estimate the amount of "truss rod to the right" I might need? I'm thinking two 1/4 turns over 2-3 days. Maybe I should do this after the warranty work?

Ken: I might, yes, but I need to keep the mentality I have with the upright, so I don't lose the ability to play that. The action on that at the octave is just over 3/8".
Can we have everything louder than everything else?
User avatar
doctorwho
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 12652
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 3:28 pm

Re: New Dakota

Post by doctorwho »

I think of truss rod adjustments in increments of 1/6, being that the nuts are hexagonal. That said, I just adjusted out a treble-side bow on my 610 Ruby, and it took 1/3 + 1/12 turns to straighten it out. If you go with 12s (I use 11s usually on my 6-strings), you probably won't need more than 1/3, IMO.
It is better, of course, to know useless things than to know nothing. - Seneca
User avatar
ken_j
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4216
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 5:31 am
Contact:

Re: New Dakota

Post by ken_j »

I would send it in for the warranty work first. They will have to remove the strings to repair the fretboard damage and may not reuse them.

Nice looking guitar John. Is that a Warwick behind it?
"The best things in life aren't things."
User avatar
FretlessOnly
Advanced Member
Posts: 1605
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 9:00 pm

Re: New Dakota

Post by FretlessOnly »

OK, thanks. Yes, that's a fretless Corvette Standard. Growls even more than my 4003FL.
Can we have everything louder than everything else?
User avatar
fretbuzzard
New member
Posts: 44
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 10:16 am

Re: New Dakota

Post by fretbuzzard »

Interesting. Does anyone have any direct experience? If you send in a guitar for warranty repair, but have it strung with non-regulation strings (say, 12s for a guitar), will Rickenbacker set it back up to factory spec with 10s?
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: New Dakota

Post by jingle_jangle »

Of course they will...do you think they'd keep a dozen or more types of non-standard strings in stock, not to mention that stringing them with non-standard strings is a quick way to void the warranty in many cases (RTOM), and it's THEIR call on the warranty's validity. Send it back with the correct strings, and don't swap strings until the warranty is up, unless you don't mind having a non-warranted instrument.
User avatar
fretbuzzard
New member
Posts: 44
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 10:16 am

Re: New Dakota

Post by fretbuzzard »

So that's a "no" to firsthand experience? :mrgreen:

It's my understanding based on Mr. Hall's comments that it's an extraordinarily rare set of strings that will invalidate Ric's warranty on a guitar. Basses, with the wide variety of tensions available, are another matter. The language of the Ric Warranty is scary, but seems to be more of a "covering our asses in case you do something stupid" statement rather than a "look askance at your instrument and the warranty is VOID" kinda thing. Of course it's their prerogative ultimately, but it benefits no one for them to be overly stringent--if the perception among consumers is that the Ric Warranty is useless for working musicians, then sales (and reputation) will ultimately suffer. This, again in my understanding, has not been the case. Rather Ric has quite a good reputation on these things.

As for keeping different gauges of strings in stock, honestly, how big a problem would this be? Ric is fond of bragging up the low percentage of instruments that get returned for warranty work, so it's not as though they'd need massive quantities. If a guitar is well-setup with non-standard strings, might it be more cost efficient to replace those strings with something similar rather than take the time necessary to re-setup the instrument from scratch? Wouldn't this be particularly true if the nut slots had been filed to accommodate the new strings? In that situation, switching back to Ric-issue strings would result in a WORSE setup, no matter how hard the tech works at setting relief and action.

But again, I'll defer to those "in the know." :wink:
jakeboy
New member
Posts: 31
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2007 5:34 am

Re: New Dakota

Post by jakeboy »

Give it some time...I play a Hamer Artist with medium frets & a Strat, Peavey, & a Tele with medium jumbos....

Going from any of them to my Dakota requires about 10 seconds to "get the feel" agaon for my Ric....but them again, I've been playing my Dakota since 2005....I find it to be like changing scale length...there is a big difference but your fingers & brain will compensate...
User avatar
schoolside
Junior Member
Posts: 137
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 11:54 pm

Re: New Dakota

Post by schoolside »

fretbuzzard wrote:Ric is fond of bragging up the low percentage of instruments that get returned for warranty work,
Several reasons for this in addition to high quality out the door. They could bring this number down to zero in a heartbeat.
User avatar
freshmattyp
Member
Posts: 238
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 6:51 am
Contact:

Re: New Dakota

Post by freshmattyp »

I can tell you from experience that going to 12's on pretty much any guitar will require some work on the nut. Keep the guitar stock until it comes back, then have it setup the way you want. I wouldn't think having a set of 12's would void the warranty, but you never know. I have them setup on all my guitars and have for years and so far no issues.
User avatar
YukonCor55
Junior Member
Posts: 176
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 5:28 pm

Re: New Dakota

Post by YukonCor55 »

John, what happened to the fretboard? I'm almost positive I had the very one you bought in my hands a week before you bought it and it was perfect. As for the frets, they'll take some getting used to but it'll happen. I tend to choke the neck too When I got my first 650D I could squeeze her a good half step out of tune for just about any chord! I just had to get my fingers to relax a bit ands all was well. I switched to 11's but eventually I was abloe to use 10's again. Ironically learning to use a lighter touch improved my bass playing!!
"The credit belongs to the man in the arena..."
'75 450/12 BG
'78 4001 AG
User avatar
FretlessOnly
Advanced Member
Posts: 1605
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 9:00 pm

Re: New Dakota

Post by FretlessOnly »

The fretboard has 13 flaws; indentations, you could call them, that are under the high E string. They vary in length from about 1/8" to 1/4". They are all located in nearly the exact relative position between the frets. They start at the very end of 13 frets and extend diagonally across the wood between frets.

That's the best I can do to describe them. I tried to take a few photos, but I couldn't capture this very well. This is purely a cosmetic issue, but quite obvious to me. There is also a grounding issue. Touching any of the metal parts causes an electronic "snap" or "click" through the amp.
Can we have everything louder than everything else?
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: Modern Years - After 1983”