Used '75 480 Vs. almost new 650C

Transition years of Rickenbacker Guitars from 1973-1983 inclusive

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
electrofaro
Senior Member
Posts: 3611
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:25 pm

Used '75 480 Vs. almost new 650C

Post by electrofaro »

Pending clearance from the g/f I got a problem... can't seem to make up my might... a '75 480 JG with "a fair bit of wear and tear" or a used 650C (haven't gotten feedback about the jackplate number yet)?

Currently the 480 goes for 650 GBP and the 650C for 700 EUR.



Cheers,

Werner
'67 Fender Coronado II CAB * '17 1963 ES-335 PB * currently rickless
User avatar
collin
Senior Member
Posts: 6992
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 6:28 pm

Re: Used '75 480 Vs. almost new 650C

Post by collin »

480.


I think the 650C is a better guitar, but they aren't making any more of the 480's, they are far rarer, and it's cheaper anyway....plus they are kinda cool guitars.
User avatar
electrofaro
Senior Member
Posts: 3611
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:25 pm

Re: Used '75 480 Vs. almost new 650C

Post by electrofaro »

You're right on the 480 not being made anymore as a major reason to get it... plus it does look appealing in shape, too.
Biggest reason against it is how to get it home: I could pick up the 650C in Belgium whereas the 480 has to be shipped without hardcase.

Side note: the 480's slightly more expensive (762 EUR + p&p) but the price difference's not something that's influencing me that much right now.



Cheers,

Werner
'67 Fender Coronado II CAB * '17 1963 ES-335 PB * currently rickless
User avatar
4003
Member
Posts: 304
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2004 5:00 am

Re: Used '75 480 Vs. almost new 650C

Post by 4003 »

I have both. The 480 has a smaller neck feel than the 650C. For me, the smaller neck fits me better. I seldom play the 650C because of the neck. Both sound great!

I would chose the well-worn 480.
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: Used '75 480 Vs. almost new 650C

Post by jingle_jangle »

+1 on the 480. Classic rare Rick with nice playability and balance and great solidbody, single-coil Rick sound.
User avatar
kiramdear
RRF Moderator
Posts: 9045
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 2:51 am
Contact:

Re: Used '75 480 Vs. almost new 650C

Post by kiramdear »

Get the 480. Way cool.
All I wanna do is rock!
xcoyle
Intermediate Member
Posts: 689
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 5:48 pm

Re: Used '75 480 Vs. almost new 650C

Post by xcoyle »

+1 480 as well, but do keep in mind the zero radius (flat) fret board on the 480 has a different feel.
User avatar
kiramdear
RRF Moderator
Posts: 9045
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 2:51 am
Contact:

Re: Used '75 480 Vs. almost new 650C

Post by kiramdear »

Yeah, the fretboards are very different. 480 = narrower and very flat, 650 = wider and rounded. If you're very picky about it that may be your deciding factor.
All I wanna do is rock!
User avatar
badeggs
Intermediate Member
Posts: 865
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 5:04 am

Re: Used '75 480 Vs. almost new 650C

Post by badeggs »

480!
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: Used '75 480 Vs. almost new 650C

Post by jingle_jangle »

xcoyle wrote:+1 480 as well, but do keep in mind the zero radius (flat) fret board on the 480 has a different feel.
Not flat, but flattish. Say, 24" radius. Very nice rock 'n' roll crown radius.
User avatar
collin
Senior Member
Posts: 6992
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 6:28 pm

Re: Used '75 480 Vs. almost new 650C

Post by collin »

Wildberry wrote:You're right on the 480 not being made anymore as a major reason to get it... plus it does look appealing in shape, too.
Biggest reason against it is how to get it home: I could pick up the 650C in Belgium whereas the 480 has to be shipped without hardcase.

Shipping is even better!

With fuel prices in Europe (and everywhere), you'd have to be really close to make it cheaper than shipping....and then you don't even have to leave home! :wink:

In any case, a 480 is a rare model that will only get rarer-----650c's are pretty much run of the mill. Cool guitars, but nothing to write home about.
xcoyle
Intermediate Member
Posts: 689
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 5:48 pm

Re: Used '75 480 Vs. almost new 650C

Post by xcoyle »

Paul, thats outside my stew-mac sanding block set. :oops:
User avatar
electrofaro
Senior Member
Posts: 3611
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:25 pm

Re: Used '75 480 Vs. almost new 650C

Post by electrofaro »

Well, as the seller of the 2005 midnight blue 360 with colour bleeding into the binding didn't want to give the jackplate number I never bid on that one (anyone been tracking that one on the 'Bay?) and the 650C's french-speaking seller didn't quite get my emails, I think that leaves one candidate...

You guys convinced me but will my "significant other" (most ugly word combo in English if you ask me) be convinced? :?: :?: :?:

Cheers,
'67 Fender Coronado II CAB * '17 1963 ES-335 PB * currently rickless
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: Used '75 480 Vs. almost new 650C

Post by jingle_jangle »

Does she play guitar? My own SigOt loves all my Ricks, and appreciates their differences, too.
User avatar
AdamG
New member
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 10:53 am

Re: Used '75 480 Vs. almost new 650C

Post by AdamG »

Wildberry wrote:You guys convinced me but will my "significant other" (most ugly word combo in English if you ask me) be convinced? :?: :?: :?:
I'm the seller of the 480.

I hope, however, I won't be responsible for breaking up love's young dream! :!:
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: Transition Years - 1973 to 1983”