Mike Rutherford 4001S FG (RM1999)

Artists Who Use Rickenbackers

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

JakeK
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5757
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:08 pm

Re: Mike Rutherford 4001S FG (RM1999)

Post by JakeK »

Bill played his long-scale Vox Wyman...I think that's the only long-scale bass I ever saw him play.

The only bass Keef ever used was a 1962 Fender Presicion...used notably on "Let's Spend the Night Together", "Sympathy for the Devil", "Street Fighting Man", "Jumpin' Jack Flash", "Happy" and The Dirty Mac's "Yer Blues"
User avatar
jon
Member
Posts: 307
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 9:26 am
Contact:

Re: Mike Rutherford 4001S FG (RM1999)

Post by jon »

jps wrote:
byu wrote:Eden, Michael Rutherford's custom Ric doubleneck was never stolen and he still has it. He made it available to Genesis cover band extraordinaire, The Musical Box (http://www.themusicalbox.net/archives/), to make a duplicate (left handed) for their show. Not sure where your info comes from.
When I saw TMM last year, their lefty Rutherford played the DN but I saw some discrepancies, so it is not an exact copy, AFAIK.
The Rickenbacker doubleneck currently at The Farm does look different to how it did in the 70s, if indeed it is actually the same one. That could account for the discrepancies.
Rickenbackers: 4003 FG, 4080 BG, 4001CS, 4003 DCM, 4080/12 MG, 4003s5 JG, 4004Cii MG.
Others by: Wal, Fender, Warwick & Washburn
Amps by : TC Electronics & Ashdown.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37336
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Mike Rutherford 4001S FG (RM1999)

Post by jps »

I have seen enough photos of the original DN (readily available online) that I am surprised they got the details wrong! Unless, as you say, they used the "wrong" bass for the model. :roll: :lol:
User avatar
ajish4
RRF Moderator
Posts: 8566
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 6:00 am

Re: Mike Rutherford 4001S FG (RM1999)

Post by ajish4 »

User avatar
atomic_punk
Senior Member
Posts: 5093
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: Mike Rutherford 4001S FG (RM1999)

Post by atomic_punk »

I think it's not the bass, its the old Acoustic and Ampeg amps that got that tone for them!

(ducking)
"They make great f***'n basses". - Lemmy, NAMM 2009
User avatar
jdogric12
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 10884
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 6:00 am

Re: Mike Rutherford 4001S FG (RM1999)

Post by jdogric12 »

Rutherford's original went through some mods at some point, so anything you see or hear will be apocryphal at best.
User avatar
BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS
Professional Player
Posts: 1857
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:58 pm

Re: Mike Rutherford 4001S FG (RM1999)

Post by BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS »

I've had discussions with others on the Rutherford Rick doubleneck and the bass he currently has is different than the one used with Genesis. From the photos that were taken in the storage warehouse, it was a different animal in certain respects.

The other thing I disagree with is that a '65 was used as the bass side. Due to the components used on the doubleneck the parts are late '68 to early '70's and the headstock seems too small for a '65. Also if he did chop a '65, it would have been a deluxe as the large inlays indicate. But then why the '70's style under string rear pickup assembly and die cast bridge with grover machines?

It sounds to me like the makings of an early '70's deluxe! What was wrong with the original components if this was the case? I don't think the luthier that put it together for him would have had the time to make such a fretboard from scratch considering Dick Knight only had 9 days from start to finish including the paint job before they went on tour!

I would like to see full shots of the body or headstock in closeup. The recent warehouse shot of the instrument has completely different hardware, picguard and pickups. The cats eye sound hole is not bound as is the one he toured with. I think the pics are on the "Dudepit" site. You be the judge.
User avatar
jdogric12
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 10884
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 6:00 am

Re: Mike Rutherford 4001S FG (RM1999)

Post by jdogric12 »

Got any links, Ron?
User avatar
BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS
Professional Player
Posts: 1857
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:58 pm

Re: Mike Rutherford 4001S FG (RM1999)

Post by BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS »

It was on Dudepit i believe last year or so. There were pics at the farm or warehouse thingy showing all the gear that was in there. The double neck was awful looking with some pickguard with dome rivet pickups.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37336
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Mike Rutherford 4001S FG (RM1999)

Post by jps »

If some mad scientist could tap into my brain they would find some closeups of Mike's DN, I saw him use it a few times back in the day. :D :D :D
User avatar
atomic_punk
Senior Member
Posts: 5093
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: Mike Rutherford 4001S FG (RM1999)

Post by atomic_punk »

Has the Dudepit been up for the last year? I thought that was gone a LONG time ago...server and software upgrades killed me.
"They make great f***'n basses". - Lemmy, NAMM 2009
User avatar
jdogric12
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 10884
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 6:00 am

Re: Mike Rutherford 4001S FG (RM1999)

Post by jdogric12 »

BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS wrote:it was on dudepit i believe last year or so. there were pics at the farm or warehouse thingy showing all the gear that was in there. the double neck was awful looking with some *********** pickguard with dome rivet pickups.

I remember those. I was told they were old photos, and it's currently much closer to its former state. I'll repeat myself... any of this info, including mine, is apocryphal at best.


from the nice folks at MW:

apocryphal:
1 : of doubtful authenticity : spurious
2 often capitalized : of or resembling the Apocrypha
User avatar
BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS
Professional Player
Posts: 1857
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:58 pm

Re: Mike Rutherford 4001S FG (RM1999)

Post by BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS »

Only Chris Squire is allowed to use big words here on us bass players as we're always late for the gig, were not told something, and can't speld wurdes oar read prawpurlee!
User avatar
jon
Member
Posts: 307
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 9:26 am
Contact:

Re: Mike Rutherford 4001S FG (RM1999)

Post by jon »

jdogric12aolcom wrote:
BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS wrote:it was on dudepit i believe last year or so. there were pics at the farm or warehouse thingy showing all the gear that was in there. the double neck was awful looking with some *********** pickguard with dome rivet pickups.

I remember those. I was told they were old photos, and it's currently much closer to its former state. I'll repeat myself... any of this info, including mine, is apocryphal at best.


from the nice folks at MW:

apocryphal:
1 : of doubtful authenticity : spurious
2 often capitalized : of or resembling the Apocrypha
Jason, I'm not so sure that anything has been done recently to the doubleneck. Dave 'Squids' Kerzner photographed the doubleneck twice fairly recently. The first time was about three years ago when he was helping the band with preparations for the last tour. The second time was probably about 18 months ago, when he was sampling various instruments at The Farm for a future samples collection. The doubleneck is the same in both sets of photographs. I think these photos are still on the web, but I cannot find them. I have them somewhere and will post copies here when I stumble across them.

I actually asked Squids if he could find out about the differences, at which point he seems to have decided that I was some sort of obsessive weirdo... :o
Rickenbackers: 4003 FG, 4080 BG, 4001CS, 4003 DCM, 4080/12 MG, 4003s5 JG, 4004Cii MG.
Others by: Wal, Fender, Warwick & Washburn
Amps by : TC Electronics & Ashdown.
User avatar
BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS
Professional Player
Posts: 1857
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:58 pm

Re: Mike Rutherford 4001S FG (RM1999)

Post by BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS »

Jon...the differences I had observed were no white binding in the cat's eye soundhole, dome rivet pickups on the 12 side, completely different ugly pickguard. Can't remember the bass side at the moment but there was something about the headstock being different. To me it looked like a possible second instrument as I could not believe the changes were for the better! Literally it went from beautiful to "oh my God, what did you do?"
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Artists”