neck thickness on late model full width inlay basses

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
gearhed289
Intermediate Member
Posts: 651
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 9:51 am
Contact:

neck thickness on late model full width inlay basses

Post by gearhed289 »

A friend of mine is interested in a 4003 with the full width inlays. Are the necks consistently thin or thick on these? She's a pretty small girl, so it's gotta be thin for her hands. Thanks guys!
User avatar
ken_j
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4216
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 5:31 am
Contact:

Re: neck thickness on late model full width inlay basses

Post by ken_j »

My bass playing friend and I were just at the guitar store today. There were two new ("09) 4003s in stock. Both had somewhat thick necks. I didn't notice the week of the build though, possibly before the 2 piece necks. These were Mid and JG so there was no way to tell by looking.
"The best things in life aren't things."
User avatar
s4001
Senior Member
Posts: 3514
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: neck thickness on late model full width inlay basses

Post by s4001 »

It seems to me that the new basses have the chunky neck. The 07 -08 seemed to have the thinner profile.
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: neck thickness on late model full width inlay basses

Post by cassius987 »

Here's my best understanding:

2000 to pre-2006: mid-thickness, less than a P Bass
2006-2008: increasingly thinner each year (I have a couple of these and love their tone, clear and warm with articulate highs and a big bottom end)
Jan-April 2009: thick neck, comparable to a P Bass (I have one of these and love its tone, clear and deep with focused low-mids and a bright punch)
May 2009 to present: thinner than 2008, according to Ben Hall

I'd aim for a very new bass or a 2008.
User avatar
VRICKY63
Intermediate Member
Posts: 899
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 2:31 am

Re: neck thickness on late model full width inlay basses

Post by VRICKY63 »

Remember "thin" is front to back not nut width. I have an 08 and it is not small hands friendly. Wide as my 64 P !
It's too early in the morning to talk about our relationship !
User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13218
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Re: neck thickness on late model full width inlay basses

Post by rickenbrother »

Rick, if you don't mind me asking, how do you hold you left hand when you play your bass?
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
User avatar
VRICKY63
Intermediate Member
Posts: 899
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 2:31 am

Re: neck thickness on late model full width inlay basses

Post by VRICKY63 »

Joey. That's hard to describe. I guess a combination of thumb in the middle back of the neck and thumb around the back of the neck depending on being up or down the fingerboard. I've mentioned before the loss of rotation in my left wrist from a motorcycle accident. I was a fat neck player for about 40 years. P basses,Dingwall,Zon,4004 etc. Now I need narrow necks to be comfortable. I had my 08 4003 converted to a 5 string to make it more comfortable for me. The thin back to front 4003 neck is very nice but like I said quite wide. 1.75" at the nut.
It's too early in the morning to talk about our relationship !
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37507
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: neck thickness on late model full width inlay basses

Post by jps »

VRICKY63 wrote:...I was a fat neck player for about 40 years. P basses,Dingwall,Zon,4004 etc......
:shock: Hmm, I wouldn't consider Zons as having fat necks. :shock:
User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13218
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Re: neck thickness on late model full width inlay basses

Post by rickenbrother »

VRICKY63 wrote:Joey. That's hard to describe. I guess a combination of thumb in the middle back of the neck and thumb around the back of the neck depending on being up or down the fingerboard. I've mentioned before the loss of rotation in my left wrist from a motorcycle accident. I was a fat neck player for about 40 years. P basses,Dingwall,Zon,4004 etc. Now I need narrow necks to be comfortable. I had my 08 4003 converted to a 5 string to make it more comfortable for me. The thin back to front 4003 neck is very nice but like I said quite wide. 1.75" at the nut.
Sounds like you hold your hand correctly. Some minor changes to how you you hold your hand might help, but if you've lost some movement in your wrist, I guess it would be hard for you to change or even for anyone who is not working closely with you to suggest how you could change.
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
User avatar
gearhed289
Intermediate Member
Posts: 651
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 9:51 am
Contact:

Re: neck thickness on late model full width inlay basses

Post by gearhed289 »

Thanks for the input. We might be taking a field trip to Chicago Music Exchange (trying, not buying!) this week. They have at least one there.
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Re: neck thickness on late model full width inlay basses

Post by rickaddict »

gearhed289 wrote:Thanks for the input. We might be taking a field trip to Chicago Music Exchange (trying, not buying!) this week. They have at least one there.
Say "hi" to 'em from Ted, Marc, Dave, and I. It's been over two years since I set foot in the place, and I'm guessing the same goes for the other three.
User avatar
VRICKY63
Intermediate Member
Posts: 899
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 2:31 am

Re: neck thickness on late model full width inlay basses

Post by VRICKY63 »

jps wrote:
VRICKY63 wrote:...I was a fat neck player for about 40 years. P basses,Dingwall,Zon,4004 etc......
:shock: Hmm, I wouldn't consider Zons as having fat necks. :shock:
You are correct Jeff. Zon necks are very fast. Mine was a 5 string fretless. Too wide after my crash.
It's too early in the morning to talk about our relationship !
User avatar
gearhed289
Intermediate Member
Posts: 651
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 9:51 am
Contact:

Re: neck thickness on late model full width inlay basses

Post by gearhed289 »

rickaddict wrote:
gearhed289 wrote:Thanks for the input. We might be taking a field trip to Chicago Music Exchange (trying, not buying!) this week. They have at least one there.
Say "hi" to 'em from Ted, Marc, Dave, and I. It's been over two years since I set foot in the place, and I'm guessing the same goes for the other three.
AHH! The DCM incident, right? Forgot about that.
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Re: neck thickness on late model full width inlay basses

Post by rickaddict »

gearhed289 wrote: Forgot about that.
Not I (obviously!)

:wink:
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37507
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: neck thickness on late model full width inlay basses

Post by jps »

VRICKY63 wrote:
jps wrote:
VRICKY63 wrote:...I was a fat neck player for about 40 years. P basses,Dingwall,Zon,4004 etc......
:shock: Hmm, I wouldn't consider Zons as having fat necks. :shock:
You are correct Jeff. Zon necks are very fast. Mine was a 5 string fretless. Too wide after my crash.
All of my Zons have been 5 strings; I sold the Sonus Special as I did not like the pickups on it. The necks are 1 7/8" at the nut so they are average for a 5 string neck but thin front to back. The 4 string necks are Jazz-like in general. Ibanez makes very narrow 5 string necks, something to consider for your needs.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”