4001 Pots

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
User avatar
nextcliffburton
Junior Member
Posts: 103
Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2009 9:08 am

4001 Pots

Post by nextcliffburton »

Hey guys! Wondering if you could help me out with somethen. I have a 4001 and was wondering how it would sound if I put 4003 pots in it. I've heard (not sure) that 4001's use 8k pots and 4003 use 11k or somethen. If I replaced the pots with the 4003 ones how much would it effect the sound? Would it be more punchy and give it more growl? What would it do? Thanks!
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: 4001 Pots

Post by cassius987 »

You're thinking pickups, actually. The pots for 4001s were generally 500K and for a 4003 they are 330K.
User avatar
nextcliffburton
Junior Member
Posts: 103
Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2009 9:08 am

Re: 4001 Pots

Post by nextcliffburton »

haha sorry I'm not good with the guts and number lol, But how will 4003 pots in a 4001 do, like how will teh sound change (Never played or owned a 4003 so I dont know the difference)
User avatar
ken_j
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4216
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 5:31 am
Contact:

Re: 4001 Pots

Post by ken_j »

I thought that the 4001 used 250k for the volume and 500k for the tone.
"The best things in life aren't things."
User avatar
nextcliffburton
Junior Member
Posts: 103
Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2009 9:08 am

Re: 4001 Pots

Post by nextcliffburton »

oooh I see
User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13218
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Re: 4001 Pots

Post by rickenbrother »

Jake, for the best growl and punch, it's probably best to leave the pots that are original to your 4001 unless they really need to be replaced.
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: 4001 Pots

Post by cassius987 »

ken_j wrote:I thought that the 4001 used 250k for the volume and 500k for the tone.
Yeah; it varied a bit apparently.
User avatar
cjj
RRF Moderator
Posts: 10932
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:17 pm
Contact:

Re: 4001 Pots

Post by cjj »

RIC typically used 500k pots for tone, 250k pots for volume, both on 4001s & 4003s. More recently they changed both to 330k because they then only have to stock one part making assembly faster and cheaper. This is not necessarily a bad thing as 330k is pretty much half way between the other two and won't make a huge difference in sound.

In general, having larger values for tone pots will give you a brighter sound. Tone pots work be essentially bleeding off the high frequencies, the amount of highs bled off related to the tone pot position.

All in all, changing the pots won't make a huge difference. Changing pickups will however. The older pickups had fewer windings, hence lower resistance readings. So, they will have a slightly lower output and a different tone.
I have NO idea what to do with those skinny stringed things... I'm just a bass player...
User avatar
ben_brown
Advanced Member
Posts: 2503
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 6:00 am

Re: 4001 Pots

Post by ben_brown »

as CJ suggested...a pickup change will definitely do the trick....he beat me to the punch! :D
You could remove or bypass the .0047 capacitor going to the bridge pup and get more umph also....
Instructions on doing this can be found here... http://www.joeysbassnotes.com/Joeys%20frameset.htm
'73 4001 MG '88 4003S JG '89 4003S FG '91 4003S MG
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”