2010

Vintage, Modern, V & C Series, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
Wurlitzer
Member
Posts: 265
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 2:55 pm

2010

Post by Wurlitzer »

there is a 21 in those numbers :twisted:
User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13207
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Re: 2010

Post by rickenbrother »

If you lose the zeros.
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
Wurlitzer
Member
Posts: 265
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 2:55 pm

Re: 2010

Post by Wurlitzer »

sorry I was just dreaming about a 21 fret 330

you're right I am seeing things :wink:
User avatar
winston
Membership Admin
Posts: 11010
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 5:00 am

Re: 2010

Post by winston »

It's good to dream Damon.......... :D
“We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.” - Albert Einstein

"You do not really understand something unless you can explain it to your grandmother" - Albert Einstein
Wurlitzer
Member
Posts: 265
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 2:55 pm

Re: 2010

Post by Wurlitzer »

yes Brian dreaming is good, at this time of year I always start to wonder what's new for Rickenbacker.

330 21 fret is not asking much

no binding, no fret inlays

piece of cake :D
User avatar
vker
New member
Posts: 33
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:24 am
Contact:

Re: 2010

Post by vker »

I'm quite surprised there hasn't been more speculation up to this point--
although the COY threads got fairly tiresome last year .. :|

still wondering here though..
User avatar
collin
Senior Member
Posts: 6992
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 6:28 pm

Re: 2010

Post by collin »

vker wrote:I'm quite surprised there hasn't been more speculation up to this point--
although the COY threads got fairly tiresome last year .. :|

still wondering here though..

People finally gave up? I hope SO ! :wink:
User avatar
Rubsoul
Member
Posts: 282
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 10:15 pm

Re: 2010

Post by Rubsoul »

Damon,
A model 1997 is the answer! :wink:
User avatar
jimk
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5355
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 7:27 am
Contact:

Re: 2010

Post by jimk »

Damon Davis wrote:sorry I was just dreaming about a 21 fret 330
Thought so even before I finished reading the thread. :lol:
JimK
shamustwin
Senior Member
Posts: 5287
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 5:00 am

Re: 2010

Post by shamustwin »

rickenbrother wrote:If you lose the zeros.
Every time I hear the phrase "lose the zeros", next thing I know I'm being ushered out of the room! :lol:
User avatar
deaconblues
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2390
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 5:14 pm

Re: 2010

Post by deaconblues »

Maybe we should be wondering what models are going to disappear next. :?
User avatar
paologregorio
Senior Member
Posts: 6376
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: 2010

Post by paologregorio »

Damon Davis wrote:yes Brian dreaming is good, at this time of year I always start to wonder what's new for Rickenbacker.

330 21 fret is not asking much

no binding, no fret inlays

piece of cake :D
Right, but after that the penchant of some Rick owners for dissatisfaction would lead to demands for X bracing as well, to go along with the 21 frets... :lol:
User avatar
Rick2005
Junior Member
Posts: 148
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 4:52 pm

Re: 2010

Post by Rick2005 »

REALLY hope for x-bracing, 21 frets (...and 1993/12 and C63 six string on regular production) :)
'66 330/12 FG - '88 330/6 FG - '89 1997 FG - '05 330/6 BB
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37498
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: 2010

Post by jps »

Rick2005 wrote:REALLY hope for x-bracing.....
I do have to say that in comparing my '67 330 to my '98 360V64 I do prefer the sound of the X-braced 330. It has a nice resonance that the solid center block 360V64 does not have.
JakeK
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5757
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:08 pm

Re: 2010

Post by JakeK »

Rick2005 wrote:REALLY hope for x-bracing, 21 frets (...and 1993/12 and C63 six string on regular production) :)
They put out a 1993/12, I am selling my V64.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: by John Simmons”