Toaster or High-Gain on a 12 string...

Vintage, Modern, V & C Series, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
oreca
Intermediate Member
Posts: 581
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 3:48 pm

Toaster or High-Gain on a 12 string...

Post by oreca »

Which pickup to choose for a Rickenbacker is a big topic here, and I'm wondering, on a 12 string, what do you feel does a better job in sounding the way you want it and the way you think it should be.

I've never had the chance to play a Ric 12 string nor a Ric with toasters... Mainly since there's no dealer here for another 1000km. I have the only Ric I've ever seen! :o

So anyways, I'd be ready to guess the toasters do a better job at giving the 12 string the "right" sound.
I love my high-gains, but if I was to buy a 12 string Ric I'd probably consider the toasters before the high-gains... Just my uninformed opinion Image
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37503
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Post by jps »

I agree, the toasters are the way to go. I have toasters on all four of my Ricks.
johnashfield
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 723
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2002 8:57 pm
Contact:

Post by johnashfield »

I may be in the minority here, but I prefer the hi-gains on my 12 string. They are sparkly and chimey but also meaty and strong sounding. The toasters to my ears just sound tinny.

Of course on my 4003 I find the toaster in the neck position, with the half inch spacing ala the 'c' series to be essential.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37503
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Post by jps »

I have to turn down the bass or roll back the neck pickup on my 660/12 most of the time, so I don't find the toasters tinny. If they were tinny I wouldn't have them on all three of my basses!

:0)
johnashfield
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 723
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2002 8:57 pm
Contact:

Post by johnashfield »

I agree with you about the toasters on the bass, gotta have it.

But on my 2 360's, I just didn't like them.
User avatar
brianb
Member
Posts: 202
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2003 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by brianb »

Being a bass player .. a Ric bass player .. I've spent the last 25 years addressing the "Tinny Issue" with other bassists. Recently I;ve just purchased my first Ric Guitar.. 340 12 VP ... I hear symphonics .. not tin.
On the other hand I know that the 12 string is a complicated instrument... which is why I still like the number 4.
360dave660
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 167
Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2002 5:00 pm

Post by 360dave660 »

I traded a 660-6 (debatable decision) for a JG '92 360-12 and switched with the trade for the VPs. It sounds nice, but, I think more and more that stock ric's are a very good option. Let's not forget that the hi-gains became stock in 69/70, so its pretty "vintage" in its own way.

Speaking of 12-strings, for fun last night, I played the lead to sleepwalk with it. It's chimy, but, the gretsch six give's a more typical sound for that song with the bigsby.

While continuning my waxings over rics, I had my gretsch 6122 country classic and my ric out at the same time, and on so many levels, I am floored at how much quality that rics give the consumer in relation to other brands. I sometimes want to get another 360-6 and put a bigsby b-5, but, I can't bring myself to put holes into the body of a rickenbacker.

But I'm preaching to the believers.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: by John Simmons”