Vintage/Modern tailpiece comparison

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
wints
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6481
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2001 11:21 am

Re: Vintage/Modern tailpiece comparison

Post by wints »

That could be the first S I have seen with Grovers...

Yup, great looking bass, really nice wood, and for that $$ who cares about the odd hardware issue. It will play like a dream and sound wonderful regardless.

Congrats Steve.
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Re: Vintage/Modern tailpiece comparison

Post by rickaddict »

wints wrote:That could be the first S I have seen with Grovers...

Yup, great looking bass, really nice wood, and for that $$ who cares about the odd hardware issue. It will play like a dream and sound wonderful regardless.

Congrats Steve.
Didn't you ever see the '69 4000 formerly owned by Kevin Teed?

http://www.rickresource.com/register/us ... llsize.jpg

:?
User avatar
86kubicki
Advanced Member
Posts: 2727
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Vintage/Modern tailpiece comparison

Post by 86kubicki »

wints wrote:That could be the first S I have seen with Grovers...
Also, they're the straight Grovers rather than the ones with wavy keys. And yes the bridge pickup isn't green or have the aluminum base plate - it looks like it might be a later 70's pickup.
Sorry Andy, but I actually found this last week when I was in your neck of the woods, (I feel like a poacher! :lol: ). Too bad we couldn't meet up when I was up around St. Pete's. I'll PM you the next time I'm down there.
User avatar
BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS
Professional Player
Posts: 1857
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:58 pm

Re: Vintage/Modern tailpiece comparison

Post by BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS »

steve...if your rear pickup has a plastic base, then you would have the large post '73 rubber magnet. hey, i've got '73 pickups in my '64 and they work just fine. congrats on scoring the bass !
User avatar
s4001
Senior Member
Posts: 3514
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: Vintage/Modern tailpiece comparison

Post by s4001 »

Sharp lookin' bass, Steve! Love those old S models.
brycycle
Advanced Member
Posts: 1774
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 2:03 pm

Re: Vintage/Modern tailpiece comparison

Post by brycycle »

86kubicki wrote:Thanks for those photos Jeff! It could be a matter of perspective, but the vintage tailpiece on the left certainly looks like its a bit bigger than the others. If this is the case, and assuming that an original bridge will be near impossible to find, do I have any options? Would a 4001 V63 or C64 tailpiece do the job, or do those share the same footprint as the modern tailpiece?
Here's a picture of the route and gap in question:
interesting, Steve - my '69 4000/1 shares the same issue w/ a gap like that, with the original tailpiece.

it was formerly owned by Kevin, as referenced in this post.

incredible score - was it here in Toronto?
User avatar
86kubicki
Advanced Member
Posts: 2727
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Vintage/Modern tailpiece comparison

Post by 86kubicki »

brycycle wrote:interesting, Steve - my '69 4000/1 shares the same issue w/ a gap like that, with the original tailpiece.

it was formerly owned by Kevin, as referenced in this post.

incredible score - was it here in Toronto?
Strange that the original tailpiece doesn't fully cover the route on your 4001 Bryce... have you ever unscrewed the tailpiece to see if it can be positioned in such a way that the route is fully covered?
I actually stumbled on the 4001S in a Sam Ash while I was in Flordia last week.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”