Replacement for 4001C64

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

rickfan63
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 896
Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2002 8:30 am

Replacement for 4001C64

Post by rickfan63 »

This may have been covered here before so if it has, my apologies as I haven't posted much in a while. But has RIC announced what the replacement will be for the C64 in the catalog yet? I've heard lots of possibilities but nothing concrete. I've heard that they had done some RM 1999 RI's for the Japan market. Just wondering. Thanks.
blueflamerick
Advanced Member
Posts: 1943
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 1:43 pm
Contact:

Re: Replacement for 4001C64

Post by blueflamerick »

No news yet. We're all wondering if something will be announced during NAMM.
User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13218
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Re: Replacement for 4001C64

Post by rickenbrother »

If there is anything new from RIC, it will most likely get posted on the company site's "Recent News" page either by the end of the day today or sometime tomorrow.
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
rickfan63
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 896
Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2002 8:30 am

Re: Replacement for 4001C64

Post by rickfan63 »

blueflamerick wrote:No news yet. We're all wondering if something will be announced during NAMM.
I was thinking that too, as well as the possibility that news might have leaked out.

I suppose we'll all have to just stay tuned.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37507
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Replacement for 4001C64

Post by jps »

rickfan63 wrote:.....the possibility that news might have leaked out.

I suppose we'll all have to just stay tuned.
RIC is quite good at not having any leaks. 8)
User avatar
cjj
RRF Moderator
Posts: 10932
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:17 pm
Contact:

Re: Replacement for 4001C64

Post by cjj »

jps wrote:
rickfan63 wrote:.....the possibility that news might have leaked out.

I suppose we'll all have to just stay tuned.
RIC is quite good at not having any leaks. 8)
So... uh... that puddle under my 4003 case must be from the dog?
:lol: :lol: :lol:
I have NO idea what to do with those skinny stringed things... I'm just a bass player...
User avatar
bottom4
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2063
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 6:24 am

Re: Replacement for 4001C64

Post by bottom4 »

check it out, it's posted! 8)
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: Replacement for 4001C64

Post by cassius987 »

Apparently NAMM = nothing new. ( http://www.rickenbacker.com/news_item.a ... ews=recent )

But part of me is happy about that announcement. Sounds like RIC is just going to keep working on the backlog. Seems smart to me.
guitfiddle
New member
Posts: 84
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 7:49 am

Re: Replacement for 4001C64

Post by guitfiddle »

cassius987 wrote:Apparently NAMM = nothing new. ( http://www.rickenbacker.com/news_item.a ... ews=recent )

But part of me is happy about that announcement. Sounds like RIC is just going to keep working on the backlog. Seems smart to me.
Chris at POTR said they were going to be pumping out 4003's at a record rate this January. Gotta fill the backlog and go with what sells I suppose.
shamustwin
Senior Member
Posts: 5287
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 5:00 am

Re: Replacement for 4001C64

Post by shamustwin »

cassius987 wrote:Apparently NAMM = nothing new. ( http://www.rickenbacker.com/news_item.a ... ews=recent )
Right, but that's today...and they do have a pretty good sense of humor, so I won't believe til the reports roll in tomorrow.
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: Replacement for 4001C64

Post by johnallg »

+1. I wonder short of doubling the machinery/tooling if they will ever catch up... More artists are using RIcks today than in the recent past and that drives demand.
User avatar
beatlefreak
Senior Member
Posts: 6160
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:45 am
Contact:

Re: Replacement for 4001C64

Post by beatlefreak »

At least there hasn't been a price increase this year.
Ka is a wheel.
User avatar
simer4001
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 4288
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2000 8:14 pm

Re: Replacement for 4001C64

Post by simer4001 »

shamustwin wrote:
cassius987 wrote:Apparently NAMM = nothing new. ( http://www.rickenbacker.com/news_item.a ... ews=recent )
Right, but that's today...and they do have a pretty good sense of humor, so I won't believe til the reports roll in tomorrow.
Exactly! I wonder what tomorrow brings?
User avatar
weemac
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2735
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2002 1:28 am

Re: Replacement for 4001C64

Post by weemac »

jps wrote:
rickfan63 wrote:.....the possibility that news might have leaked out.

I suppose we'll all have to just stay tuned.
RIC is quite good at not having any leaks. 8)

What about an onion?

:mrgreen:

Eden.
rickfan63
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 896
Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2002 8:30 am

Re: Replacement for 4001C64

Post by rickfan63 »

Considering the backlog and that there is nothing new at NAMM, the wait to see what comes after the C64 could be another year. I just thought it would be interesting to see what it might be. RM 1999, (kind of doubt it since the C64 was so close to that) 4001V68,(that would be nice) 4002, (that would be a very popular choice I think , but hardly an overlap to the C64 IMHO) I kick myself though for not getting one when they were in production. I may be wrong on this, but outside of a 60's RIC bass, these seem to be the hardest to find and come at premium prices when they do pop up.

Oh well. The wait and the speculation continues. Thanks guys for indulging my curiosity.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”