Not getting on with my new 4004

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
jakeox
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1123
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 7:40 am
Contact:

Not getting on with my new 4004

Post by jakeox »

I had to sell a few basses to buy my 4002, and a 2005 4004L MID was one of the ones that went ... I liked that bass a lot, but thought it was more replaceable than the ones I kept. So once I sold my 4002, one of the first basses I bought was a 4004L -- this one's BBR, and a 2008 model. What I liked about my 05 Laredo was that it sounded different from a 4001/3, but still similar, and I didn't have to change my EQ settings much to move between them (a little less master volume, a good amount less bass, and a touch more mids for the L). The new 2008 Laredo just sounds different to me from the 2005, although I can't compare them side-by-side, obviously. It sounds a lot boomier and muddier to me. It's possible that there's something I'm missing here that would make this work for me -- turn down the bass EQ even more than I thought, new strings, etc. -- any thoughts? Or has anyone noticed significant tonal differences over the past few years' runs of Laredos? Both have the neck pickup right up against the neck.

I'd like to make this one work because it feels good and looks incredible, but if I have to trade it for an older L, so be it. I really dug the looks of that MID, actually.
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: Not getting on with my new 4004

Post by cassius987 »

Dan Russell had really, really bad luck with some 2008 4004Ls that were also BBR I'm really sorry to say. I have since played 3 Ciis and loved them, but I have no experience with the Ls other than what he told me and hardly any of it was positive. I know that RIC hung on to several 4004s for a spell to make sure they were well prepared to leave the factory and that 2008-released-in-2009 batch seemed to do really well IIRC. So I don't quite know... Good luck Jake.
User avatar
incubus2432
Senior Member
Posts: 4174
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 11:26 am

Re: Not getting on with my new 4004

Post by incubus2432 »

Are the p/u's adjusted as high as possible just so they don't get hit by the strings during aggressive playing? Just a thought.
guitfiddle
New member
Posts: 84
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 7:49 am

Re: Not getting on with my new 4004

Post by guitfiddle »

I have an '06 4004L. It's definitely a lot muddier than my 4003 but I have enough EQ capabilities to even out the two basses onstage. In many ways the bass reminds me of that smooth sound that Jack Bruce got out of his Gibson EB-0 on the Cream reunion. All in all it's one of my favorite basses.
User avatar
cheyenne
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6263
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2001 11:39 am

Re: Not getting on with my new 4004

Post by cheyenne »

I have an '08 Laredo that sounds quite good. When I first got it I had some neck issues, but after a few forum proven remedies it plays quite well now.

My experience is the opposite, I really hated the tone of my tranny red '02 cheyenne, but the Laredo sounds very punchy and Rickish. I run the bridge pickup full on, and roll the neck pickup back slightly until the definition comes into focus.

I did alot of experimentation with strings. I was a diehard D'Addario XL-170 fan, (still love them on my other basses), but discovered that DR Highbeams .40 .60 .80 .100 really bring out the tone of the Laredo. I havent had a chance to try "Sunbeams" yet, but want to try them next. For right now the Highbeams are fine. Give them a try, it may help.

I also use a GK 700RB II into a GK 112-II NEO cab. :D
"Knowledge is Power"
jakeox
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1123
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 7:40 am
Contact:

Re: Not getting on with my new 4004

Post by jakeox »

Thanks for the thoughts on this, all. I did a little more playing around with the setup and switched from my practice rig to my main rig (Markbass R500 > Schroeder 1210L) and both seemed to help. I'm still preferring the tone of the bridge pickup to the neck, even though I've tweaked a lot of the "boom" out. Would lowering the neck pickup make it less boomy? The bridge pickup is already a bit closer to the strings, but it seems counterintuitive to me to raise the neck pickup to match.
User avatar
VRICKY63
Intermediate Member
Posts: 899
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 2:31 am

Re: Not getting on with my new 4004

Post by VRICKY63 »

You can also re-wire the pickup leads at the pots for a singlecoil sound.
It's too early in the morning to talk about our relationship !
User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13218
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Re: Not getting on with my new 4004

Post by rickenbrother »

Rick is correct. Here's the link for the HB1 schematic on the RIC website:

HB1 Schematic
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
User avatar
woodyng
Senior Member
Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 11:11 am

Re: Not getting on with my new 4004

Post by woodyng »

i'm wondering about the effect of string gauge on the 4004. i had some work done on mine,and subsequently went with a heavier gauge string than what i previously had on there,the playability has suffered,and the heavier e and a strings seem to be muddying things up a bit---i am probably going to go back to a lighter gauge. with that wider neck,it seems like the lighter strings keep it as fast-feeling as the 4001 style necks......i love my cii,so this was a setback....
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”