My bad. There are actually 24 strings between the two of them!jps wrote:libratune wrote:Here's a comparison I did between my 1992 360/23V64 and 2009 360/12C63:A 23 string Rick?!!?!?!?
![]()


Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
My bad. There are actually 24 strings between the two of them!jps wrote:libratune wrote:Here's a comparison I did between my 1992 360/23V64 and 2009 360/12C63:A 23 string Rick?!!?!?!?
![]()
That would require the wider neck...jps wrote:libratune wrote:Here's a comparison I did between my 1992 360/23V64 and 2009 360/12C63:A 23 string Rick?!!?!?!?
![]()
I agree. +1dpowell wrote:I find a smaller radius more comfortable to play. Many prefer a large radius fretboard because it won't affect string bending, but on a 12-string that wouldn't be much of an issue.
Assuming that that is true, my various Ricks of different vintages have inlays of all sorts of levels of gray.GSRIC wrote:Any reason you can think of why they made the inlays grayer? Only reason I can think of is that in the last fairly good pic showing George holding the Ric it shows the inlays as being more gray compared to the noticably more white pearl inlays of Rics of the same period. I also read someone else's post on the forum
a while back with regard to inlays on the necks - that Rickenbacker had supposedly changed the way they were doing the inlays, somewhat, using less white pearl in the inlay mixtures than before. The person also mentioned that the mixing of the pearl with the rest of the inlay material was very critical as to how the inlay would come out once the mixture had hardened. Would love to hear from anyone else who knows more about this.