Do the newer 4003 basses have thinner upper horns?

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
Jim Dandy
Junior Member
Posts: 111
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:36 pm

Do the newer 4003 basses have thinner upper horns?

Post by Jim Dandy »

I just noticed that the upper horn on the new 4003 basses (at least from late 2009/2010) seem thinner than in previous years. Has anyone else noticed this or am I mistaken?
Last edited by Jim Dandy on Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
paul_yan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2119
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 2:09 pm
Contact:

Re: Do the new 4003 basses have thinner horns?

Post by paul_yan »

Yes, some of us have.

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=393752

Welcome to the forum, Jim. :D
Jim Dandy
Junior Member
Posts: 111
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:36 pm

Re: Do the newer 4003 basses have thinner upper horns?

Post by Jim Dandy »

Paul - Thanks for the link and the welcome. :mrgreen: I missed that thread when I searched earlier.

Do you know when they made the change to the thinner upper horns?

I have to say, the combination of the newer thinner neck and the thinner upper horn is a very nice combination.
User avatar
paul_yan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2119
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 2:09 pm
Contact:

Re: Do the newer 4003 basses have thinner upper horns?

Post by paul_yan »

Very much agreed, Carl.

The earliest thin horn that I've touched and played is my 1st week of May 2009 4003 JG. So I tend to think that both the thinner (than 2001~2009/03) 2-piece neck and thinner (than pre-2009/04) horn combination debuted in April 2009.

Image

Image

The neck thickness of my 2010/01 FG is practically the same as my 1998 4003 FG, but still thicker than my '86 Shadow and '72 4001 FL MG. My 2009/05 JG is slightly thicker than my 2010, but definitely thinner than the 2001~2009/03 ones.

I've tried to carefully measure the thickness of both necks with more precision, here's what I got:

2009/05 neck thickness:

1st---- 22.8 mm
5th---- 23.6 mm
9th---- 24.4 mm
12th----24.8 mm
15th----25 mm

2010/01 FG neck thickness :

1st---- 22.7 mm
5th---- 22.9 mm
9th---- 23.2 mm
12th----23.4 mm
15th----23.5 mm
Jim Dandy
Junior Member
Posts: 111
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:36 pm

Re: Do the newer 4003 basses have thinner upper horns?

Post by Jim Dandy »

Paul - thanks for the information and the pictures. That JG sure is pretty! :) I think my next Rickenbacker will be a JG.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37496
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Do the newer 4003 basses have thinner upper horns?

Post by jps »

Jim Dandy wrote:Paul - thanks for the information and the pictures. That JG sure is pretty! :) I think my next Rickenbacker will be a JG.
I'll help reinforce that thought! :wink: :mrgreen:
User avatar
Ric N. Backer
Member
Posts: 427
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 11:12 pm

Re: Do the newer 4003 basses have thinner upper horns?

Post by Ric N. Backer »

The horns have been shaved down some, and the pickguard is slightly closer to the top edge of the body.

I like the larger dots on the side of the neck! :)
If Mozart were with us today, he'd play a Fireglo 4001C64! ~~~*~~~ Beethoven, on the other hand, would play a Matte Jetglo 4001C64S!
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: Do the newer 4003 basses have thinner upper horns?

Post by aceonbass »

The pickguard is not closer to the top edge of the body. The cutaways were cut in closer for better upper register access, which gives that illusion. Unfortunately this weakens the neck where it transistions to the body with the big route in there for the neck pickup.The newer two piece neck construction helps a lot here though.
User avatar
Ric N. Backer
Member
Posts: 427
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 11:12 pm

Re: Do the newer 4003 basses have thinner upper horns?

Post by Ric N. Backer »

aceonbass wrote:The pickguard is not closer to the top edge of the body. The cutaways were cut in closer for better upper register access, which gives that illusion. Unfortunately this weakens the neck where it transistions to the body with the big route in there for the neck pickup.The newer two piece neck construction helps a lot here though.
Let me reword that.

The space between the top of the pick guard and the body has diminished. The same is true on the sides to some extent.

I still like the larger dots on the side of the neck! :D
If Mozart were with us today, he'd play a Fireglo 4001C64! ~~~*~~~ Beethoven, on the other hand, would play a Matte Jetglo 4001C64S!
User avatar
godber
Advanced Member
Posts: 2650
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 11:07 am

Re: Do the newer 4003 basses have thinner upper horns?

Post by godber »

We had a little chat about that...viewtopic.php?f=2&t=395189&hilit=+4003 :)
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”