A "Fire"-storm of Controversy

General Rickenbacker discussion

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
godber
Advanced Member
Posts: 2650
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 11:07 am

Re: A "Fire"-storm of Controversy

Post by godber »

steverok wrote:Love the pink on that one ! LOL ...
Nah, this is pink Steve. See? :twisted:

Image
User avatar
8mileshigher
Senior Member
Posts: 4886
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 12:34 pm

Re: A "Fire"-storm of Controversy

Post by 8mileshigher »

winston wrote:Great thread Steve.......... :D

+100 on that !!!! :D
Keep those cards and letters coming folks -- this is one of the best humor threads on the RRF and it is great reading.

Notice how many folks are just trying to bump their postings-count with added controversy and throwing more gasoline on the "fire" :roll: :wink: :lol: !!!

[By the way -- note to Admin: when I went to shade the color on the "+100" above, I noticed that the color chart selection does not include anything remotely close to Fire Glo or Clown-Glo or Amber FireGlo or Montezuma Brown, etc. etc. etc. ] :lol:
User avatar
rickendelic
Member
Posts: 278
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 6:13 pm

Re: A "Fire"-storm of Controversy

Post by rickendelic »

pinkytuscaderoglo?
User avatar
scotty
Senior Member
Posts: 7097
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:27 am

Re: A "Fire"-storm of Controversy

Post by scotty »

Image[/quote]
Mark,Im absolutely sick to back teeth of seeing your V64 its so shallow every post its your V64 get over it................. Heres Pinky

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
steverok
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1139
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 7:16 pm
Contact:

Re: A "Fire"-storm of Controversy

Post by steverok »

I'll call this one "FireGlo Inundation"
User avatar
scotty
Senior Member
Posts: 7097
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:27 am

Re: A "Fire"-storm of Controversy

Post by scotty »

steverok wrote:I'll call this one "FireGlo Inundation"
Double bound too :lol:
Favorite thread of the year so far.
fireglo67

Re: A "Fire"-storm of Controversy

Post by fireglo67 »

steverok wrote:Hello fellow Ric enthusiasts,

The time has come for me to address an issue that has been eating away at me for some time. It involves the evolution of the FireGlo finish, and the sometimes boorish and insensitive attitude with which some people seem to approach this very sensitive topic. You see, most of us have a FireGlo guitar or bass, and, as we know, the shade of the FireGlo finish varies all over the place, from era to era, year to year, and instrument to instrument. However, there are some people who post all of these lurid and seductive photos of their “amazing” FireGlo, or their “new” FireGlo, or their “90s FireGlo”, which makes some of us people, who just have “regular” FireGlo, or “clown” FireGlo, or “pinky” FireGlo, feel bad. The only way to fight back is to point out that all FireGlo’s have pink, by definition, or that our manhood is not on the line in regard to our specific brand of FireGlo, or that JetGlo is cooler, etc. For example, I have a 360-12FG from 2005, which certainly has a pink characteristic, but not much more than most of the FireGlo’s I’ve seen, and the finish itself is a bit of a “lollipop” FireGlo. This guitar, however, is set up perfectly, the sound has warmed up and broken in, appearing, now, on many of my recorded songs, and shown up at live performances as well, where it was oogled and marvelled at by many an audience member. However, in spite of all that, I have developed a bit of “FireGlo envy”, because I read this darned forum ! An instrument which has brought joy to my life is now occasionally subjected to an undeserved scrutiny, which undeniably coincides with the times that I read RRF. I would, therefore, like to add some definitions and terms to the RRF vernacular, which will help promote a more PC attitude in regard to FireGlo. Besides, I am pushing toward 1,000 posts, and I figure, no better way to get there than to ignite a firestorm of controversy. So, without further ado, here we go :

(1) “FireGlo Sensitivity” : A general concern/regard for others regarding FireGlo
(2) “FireGlo Envy” : Jealousy over the FireGlo of others
(3) “FireGlo Remorse” : Suffering and/or belaboring over one’s own FireGlo
(4) “FireGlo Snobbery” : A boorish, blatant, and unabashed arrogance regarding FireGlo
(5) “FireGlo Grandstanding” : Bragging and ostentatious behavior regarding FireGlo
(6) “FireGlo Callousness” : Lack of FireGlo Sensitivity
(7) “FireGlo Blinders” : Obsessing so much over the shade of FireGlo, to the point where tone, set-up, and actually knowing how to play guitar are either secondary or irrelevant.
(8) “FireGlo Tryanny” : Similar to “FireGlo Snobbery” and “FireGlo Grandstanding”, except FireGlo tyrannists try to buy up only and all of the best FireGlo’s, and show lots of pictures of them, claiming to be the world’s living expert on FireGlo, and mocking all others.

I welcome additional suggestions, but we need ones that really “stick”.

Cheers !

Steve-O
Fire-GloPhobia (Fear of rubbish fireglo)

Steve, I'll take your Fire-GloPhobia and raise you one.

I don't think that any member on this forum, that has more Rickenbackers than me (3!), should be allowed to mention any more than 3 guitars in their collection.
I look at my 3 beauties lying on the bed, and I feel privileged to be in a position where I can afford to have such wonderful guitars.
Then I come onto this forum and see you all boasting how you've got a Diamond-Glo 7 string Superbacker, and how you haven't even opened the case of it yet because you've got 20 other rare and wonderful Rickenbackers that have just arrived this morning.
And I then look at my standard Jetglo 360/12, lying there with it's plain white TRC, pickguards and standard knobs, and shout at it, "Damn you! Why aren't you a 360V64?!"

So yes, it's a positive diagnosis.

I have.... SmallPlainRickenbackerCollectionGlo-Phobia! :lol:
User avatar
steverok
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1139
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 7:16 pm
Contact:

Re: A "Fire"-storm of Controversy

Post by steverok »

We also need one to describe someone who's always sneaking in a picture of their FG, you know, the old "you mean like THIS ONE ??" routine.

I'll call that :

(9) "FireGlo Intrusion" : The act of always trampling on another's thread with a picture of THEIR FireGlo. This is equivalent to the old game of "one-up-manship". This is really just an example of "FireGlo Grandstanding" or "FireGlo Callousness".
User avatar
scotty
Senior Member
Posts: 7097
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:27 am

Re: A "Fire"-storm of Controversy

Post by scotty »

Mateybob wrote:
got a Diamond-Glo 7 string Superbacker
:lol: :lol: :lol:
fireglo67

Re: A "Fire"-storm of Controversy

Post by fireglo67 »

steverok wrote:We also need one to describe someone who's always sneaking in a picture of their FG, you know, the old "you mean like THIS ONE ??" routine.

I'll call that :

(9) "FireGlo Intrusion" : The act of always trampling on another's thread with a picture of THEIR FireGlo. This is equivalent to the old game of "one-up-manship". This is really just an example of "FireGlo Grandstanding" or "FireGlo Callousness".
Do you mean like this one?
Attachments
IMG_3655.JPG
User avatar
rickendelic
Member
Posts: 278
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 6:13 pm

Re: A "Fire"-storm of Controversy

Post by rickendelic »

:( why is the top horn of you 360 cropped out????
fireglo67

Re: A "Fire"-storm of Controversy

Post by fireglo67 »

rickendelic wrote::( why is the top horn of you 360 cropped out????
Because it's an AmberFireCrop-Glo.
User avatar
scotty
Senior Member
Posts: 7097
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:27 am

Re: A "Fire"-storm of Controversy

Post by scotty »

Well this thread needs some pics.
Image
User avatar
scotty
Senior Member
Posts: 7097
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:27 am

Re: A "Fire"-storm of Controversy

Post by scotty »

Did you here the one about the barbie doll and a spray booth?
Image
fireglo67

Re: A "Fire"-storm of Controversy

Post by fireglo67 »

scotty wrote:Well this thread needs some pics.
Image

:lol: Post of the year.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker General: by Howard Bishop”