McCartney w/o flats? Sacrilege?

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
KenOnBass
New member
Posts: 57
Joined: Wed May 05, 2010 11:25 pm

Re: McCartney w/o flats? Sacrilege?

Post by KenOnBass »

As a compromise, I put Sadowsky flats on my Sadowsky P/J. Flats are comfortably and easy to play, but still weird to me. I can nail the Jamerson style with it and I like it for that, but on a Ric...still seems like an unnatural act.
scowboy
New member
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 8:00 pm

Re: McCartney w/o flats? Sacrilege?

Post by scowboy »

agree go with what works for you.
User avatar
BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS
Professional Player
Posts: 1857
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:58 pm

Re: McCartney w/o flats? Sacrilege?

Post by BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS »

teeder wrote:This is simple and I can't believe no one else has suggested it.
You need two basses! :mrgreen:

it is because it was simple, that no one suggested it ! :lol: i think we're a complicated lot, eh ?
rickfan63
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 896
Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2002 8:30 am

Re: McCartney w/o flats? Sacrilege?

Post by rickfan63 »

gearhed289 wrote:I agree that you'll be fine with the right settings and palm muting. BUT - I have to say, there's something about flats that you can't totally reproduce with anything but... flats! Just last night I tracked a new song of mine with my one flatwound equipped bass - a '73 Guild JSII. I seriously considered putting flats on my CS, cause I really wanted to use a Ric on the track, but the Guild has its own mojo that I dig, so I spared myself the trouble. BTW - I am LOVING Guitar Rig 4 for recording bass, and I'm a hard core, miked tube amp purist. :D
+1. There is nothing like the sound of flats, played with a pick, through a slightly overdriven all tube amp.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”