How are the bridge saddles of 2010?

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

How are the bridge saddles of 2010?

Post by cassius987 »

Hey fellow bass players. I am giving all of my basses fairly exhaustive setups now that I own this handy little tool called... a tiny, precise ruler. And I was noticing on one of my basses, my 4003 AFG as it were, that the string spacing is not totally even. This is actually my fault in a way. RIC sent this bass from the factory in 2007, with a slight "saddle wobble" on a couple of the strings--oddly it took time for the wobble to actually develop, over a month of steady playing, which still boggles me as the issue is fairly intrinsic to a feature of the saddles that can't easily be changed (post height). Anywho, I called RIC and they sent me new saddles to replace the wobbly ones. I cut the new ones myself and that was over a year ago, when I was just starting out becoming my own guitar tech. Well, I did a decent job, but not perfect. The spacing between A/D and D/G is dead on, but I clammed the E/A space so that it's about 3/32'' off (smaller than the others).

So... I would really like to order new saddles from RIC and get this set up right. However, I don't want to if we're currently experiencing another wave of slightly off-tolerance saddles because then I will have to go through all of that again. Normally I'd be willing to just shim the post from the bottomside of the bridge but these off-tolerance saddles also do bad things for your action--they usually push the string in question further away from the fingerboard than the other saddles, that sit flush to the bridge, do.

The short of it: if you've gotten a 2010 4003, 4001C64, or 4001C64S, did the bridge give you any trouble, or is it solid as a rock? If you haven't had any problems, don't worry your sweet little punkin' head and go looking, because I have found this issue is pretty much either "on" or "off"--99% of the saddles will either wobble or they won't (rather than changing behavior sometimes as mine oddly did, but once they made the "shift" it was permanent...) and if they do wobble you'll hear it when playing unplugged.
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: How are the bridge saddles of 2010?

Post by cassius987 »

Nobody? I thought we had a few 2010 owners here. Maybe no news is good news!! :D
User avatar
cjj
RRF Moderator
Posts: 10932
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:17 pm
Contact:

Re: How are the bridge saddles of 2010?

Post by cjj »

Yeah, I think so. My 2010 seems just fine...
I have NO idea what to do with those skinny stringed things... I'm just a bass player...
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Re: How are the bridge saddles of 2010?

Post by rickaddict »

Saddles aren't that expensive. 5 bucks each? Put 'em on and find out, then file the groove. When I'm filing fresh saddles I measure with a dial caliper to get the groove centered and a triangular file to cut.

If one string is higher than the rest, cut it's groove deeper.
User avatar
jdogric12
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 10925
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 6:00 am

Re: How are the bridge saddles of 2010?

Post by jdogric12 »

Sorry I hv a 2010 but its a 360 12!
User avatar
spongebob
Intermediate Member
Posts: 502
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 6:32 am

Re: How are the bridge saddles of 2010?

Post by spongebob »

I've got a 2010 MG 4003.

Bridge saddles actually did give me a small issue....developed a bit of looseness over first couple of months.

Became quite audible, and obviously quite annoying!

When I got it setup, action as low as it would go, the luthier took a look, and at first glance thought the offending saddle would have to be replaced or modified. However, with a little tweaking, he sorted the problem.

It's the first saddle issue I've had on any Ric, but in the right hands, problem solved....so not technically a problem at all. :D

Incidentally, slightly off-topic, but my 2010 4003 has a lot less bottom end than others I've owned.....not a bad thing....it's got a real kind of bouncy, Squire-esque tone (more 4001?). It really cuts through, and I've been gigging it a lot!
1974 (February) 4001 JG
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: How are the bridge saddles of 2010?

Post by cassius987 »

With bottom end I find most of my Rics have too much and I have to dial it back in EQ all the time or else club owners complain, so now I set my pickups so that the G string side is a mm closer than the E string side. That seems to even it out.

Thanks for the comments... I know saddles are relatively cheap but shipping and time involved are also factors for me.
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: How are the bridge saddles of 2010?

Post by aceonbass »

The last 5 bridge saddles I ordered from RIC sat TOO TALL AGAIN!The amount of time this takes to fix is completely disproportional to what they cost. The adjusting screw hole is still being drilled about 1MM too low on the saddle post. This can be partially compensated for my drilling the holes in the bridge opposite the countersunk ones out over sized, but not completely. The proper files for slotting a string saddle are gauged nut files, NOT triangular files. I don't even think RIC uses those any more.
User avatar
doctorwho
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 12659
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 3:28 pm

Re: How are the bridge saddles of 2010?

Post by doctorwho »

"How are the bridge saddles of 2010?"

New bass model, the 2010? ... :lol:
It is better, of course, to know useless things than to know nothing. - Seneca
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: How are the bridge saddles of 2010?

Post by cassius987 »

aceonbass wrote:The last 5 bridge saddles I ordered from RIC sat TOO TALL AGAIN!The amount of time this takes to fix is completely disproportional to what they cost. The adjusting screw hole is still being drilled about 1MM too low on the saddle post.
:(
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Re: How are the bridge saddles of 2010?

Post by rickaddict »

aceonbass wrote:The proper files for slotting a string saddle are gauged nut files, NOT triangular files. I don't even think RIC uses those any more.
Probably so. But a few years ago Mike Parks at the Rickenbacker Page told me that a triangular file is what RIC used, so I bought one. I also have gauged nut files and have used them to file Rick saddle slots. Having tried both, I have come to the conclusion that I much prefer the triangular file.

8)
User avatar
doctorwho
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 12659
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 3:28 pm

Re: How are the bridge saddles of 2010?

Post by doctorwho »

I have used a triangular file, and it seems to work fine for bridge saddles. I have not used one to cut a nut, and I think that I would probably go with round files for that.
It is better, of course, to know useless things than to know nothing. - Seneca
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: How are the bridge saddles of 2010?

Post by aceonbass »

While RIC used to use triangular files for the saddles AND the nut at one time, they now use properly gauged nut files. It's easier to start the saddle notches with the sharp edge of a basic triangular file, but getting the slot to the proper depth and maximizing string contact with the saddle is more accurately done with a nut file. If you have the right tool already, why not use it? Besides, we play Ricks, if fine were good enough we'd play Fenders.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”