US v UK 2

Remembers classic songs from the late 1950s and 1960s
User avatar
royclough
RRF Consultant
Posts: 3118
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2001 3:17 pm
Contact:

US v UK 2

Post by royclough »

Ok here's another which may grab more interest.Shane Fenton won hands down on last.

Steve Lawrence took this to number 9 in US in Decemebr 59, a month later the UK cover version by Craig Douglas made number 4 in UK
Lawrence actually had 2/3 numbers covered by UK acts.


Which gets your vote.






User avatar
scotty
Senior Member
Posts: 7097
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:27 am

Re: US v UK 2

Post by scotty »

Im voting for the` singing milkman` Roy i think Craig has got a more velvet tone to his voice and appeals more to me. :D
User avatar
royclough
RRF Consultant
Posts: 3118
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2001 3:17 pm
Contact:

Re: US v UK 2

Post by royclough »

I'm with You there, people forget in UK how many hits CD had nearly all covers of US hits though.
User avatar
its-sylviab
New member
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 7:34 am

Re: US v UK 2

Post by its-sylviab »

It has to be the Craig Douglas version for me as well as I loved his voice and as he was one of my mum's favourites,
she had all of his records and two of them that I liked, even though I wasn't very old, were "Our Favourite Melodies"
and "Time" but I haven't heard either for ages! Maybe an email to SOTS is called for! :D

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKgudvvdxto

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xi8hJeEASyo
JeffZ
Member
Posts: 200
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 8:10 pm

Re: US v UK 2

Post by JeffZ »

I have to give this one to Steve Lawrence, his version is quicker and the double tracked harmonies are good.
User avatar
royclough
RRF Consultant
Posts: 3118
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2001 3:17 pm
Contact:

Re: US v UK 2

Post by royclough »

good Jeff a difference of opinion
User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 15135
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2000 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: US v UK 2

Post by admin »

I had the greatest fun listening to these two numbers.

I asked myself while listening which version might be better received by the love of the singer's life. As Jeff mentions Steve Lawrence sings a sped up version with some nice harmonies. It is, however, rushed in my view and the full impact of the nice harmonies are lessened for me. Also, the mix of his version is heavy on strings, voices of the angels and so forth and is definitely orchestrated with the "wall of sound" approach. I found the background overpowering and at time harsh, juxaposing the sentiment. Steve sings this song in the key of F and with the harmonies the song is more forceful than it needs to be. Steve is also rushing things with a track time of 1:50.

The more youthful Craig Douglas version is softer, gentler and is more in keeping with the romance that I suspect the composers had in mind. The guitar is a lovely touch and easy to imagine this young man playing and singing to "blue eyes." I enjoyed the mix better with the background adding rather than detracting from the overall impression of the song. Craig sings the song in Eb and the lower key and slower tempo provides a somewhat sleepier and dreamer feel. His presentation time shows a bit more patience coming in at 2:08.

All in all, I found the Craig Douglas version to be more appealing and I suspect blue eyes would too. :)
Life, as with music, often requires one to let go of the melody and listen to the rhythm

Please join the Official RickResource Forum Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/groups/379271585440277
User avatar
longhouse
Advanced Member
Posts: 2103
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2003 6:43 pm
Contact:

Re: US v UK 2

Post by longhouse »

Edge goes to Steve Lawrence ...for the harmonies and audible guitars.

GREAT versions, both.
User avatar
royclough
RRF Consultant
Posts: 3118
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2001 3:17 pm
Contact:

Re: US v UK 2

Post by royclough »

excellent analysis Peter and agree totally

so far Craig 4 Steve 2 any more votes
User avatar
sowhat
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5380
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2003 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: US v UK 2

Post by sowhat »

Well, if "neither" is not an option, i'll vote for the first one.
Nothing will get you dead quicker than being deadly serious about yourself.
User avatar
royclough
RRF Consultant
Posts: 3118
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2001 3:17 pm
Contact:

Re: US v UK 2

Post by royclough »

Thanks Sheena, hope you're ok, not really your type of music but thanks again for the contribution.
User avatar
kiramdear
RRF Moderator
Posts: 9045
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 2:51 am
Contact:

Re: US v UK 2

Post by kiramdear »

I'll go with Craig. His voice is more expressive and the arrangement is clearer and sweeter.
All I wanna do is rock!
User avatar
royclough
RRF Consultant
Posts: 3118
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2001 3:17 pm
Contact:

Re: US v UK 2

Post by royclough »

thanks Kiri
User avatar
ozover50
RRF Consultant
Posts: 10492
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Contact:

Re: US v UK 2

Post by ozover50 »

+1 for Craig, Roy. Totally agree with Peter's analysis . :D
"Never eat more than you can lift." - Mr. Moon
User avatar
jimk
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5355
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 7:27 am
Contact:

Re: US v UK 2

Post by jimk »

Gotta go with the Craig Douglas version. I like the slightly slower tempo better, which allows for more expressivity.
JimK
Post Reply

Return to “Clough's Classics: by Roy Clough”