How thin are the old ricks? Video evidence?

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

jamespaul71
Junior Member
Posts: 142
Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2009 2:51 pm

Re: How thin are the old ricks? Video evidence?

Post by jamespaul71 »

seyesbass wrote:Great video..............more of!

The RM series of basses from my experience are quite thinner than current and "V" 4001 basses although the CS was very close in dimensions.
None of the three RMs I owned had any volute behind the nut and there was vey little tilt back of the headstock.


Has anyone ever tried shaving off the volute to emulate the 60s shape?
Would it take the tension I wonder.
It would be an interesting experiment, perhaps someone here can buy a destroyed 4001 on ebay or craiglist and experiment?
User avatar
seyesbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 557
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 2:44 pm
Contact:

Re: How thin are the old ricks? Video evidence?

Post by seyesbass »

I could get the angle grinder on my CS and have a go.
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: How thin are the old ricks? Video evidence?

Post by johnallg »

seyesbass wrote:I could get the angle grinder on my CS and have a go.
For some odd reason I don't think that is going to happen. :lol:
ricmic
Member
Posts: 405
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 8:43 pm

Re: How thin are the old ricks? Video evidence?

Post by ricmic »

Yea John, I'm not buying that either. Mark
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”