Strings: 10s v. 11s

General Rickenbacker discussion

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
antipodean
Senior Member
Posts: 3182
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 1:27 am

Re: Strings: 10s v. 11s

Post by antipodean »

I have 12s on my jag - but that's out of necessity, the neck is chronically back-bowed and 12s bring it into true. The 12s sound nice and chimey.
"I don't want to sound incredulous but I can't believe it" Rex Mossop
JakeK
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5757
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:08 pm

Re: Strings: 10s v. 11s

Post by JakeK »

Right now, my guitars are strung up like this:
Strat: D'Addario nickel wound .011 gauge strings
Tele: D'Addario nickel-wound .010 gauge strings
1997: Curt Mangan nickel-wound .010 gauge strings with wound "G" (the "G" being a salvaged CM string from my 360/12V64)
360/12V64: Thomastik-Infeld Jazz/Swing flatwound 12-string set

Might keep it this way for a while. The wound "G" works on a hollowbody and is better for Jazz and the like. The plain "G" works for the solid bodies because I tend to do more bends on them.
User avatar
electrofaro
Senior Member
Posts: 3611
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:25 pm

Re: Strings: 10s v. 11s

Post by electrofaro »

whojamfan wrote:had 9s on it once for 5 min and couldn't believe how awful that felt.
I have .011 TI on my 360 and .010 TI on my 340. At work they had a couple of guitars with .008 and... uhm... it cost a few strings... :oops:
'67 Fender Coronado II CAB * '17 1963 ES-335 PB * currently rickless
User avatar
360girl
Member
Posts: 230
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 7:59 pm

Re: Strings: 10s v. 11s

Post by 360girl »

I used 10s with a wound G for about 25 plus years. For the past few months, I've been using 11s on all of my guitars (including my 360). I their stiffer feel helps playbility for me, when I dig in while playing fast runs.
User avatar
doctorwho
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 12658
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 3:28 pm

Re: Strings: 10s v. 11s

Post by doctorwho »

I typically use 11s (flatwounds) on my guitars.
It is better, of course, to know useless things than to know nothing. - Seneca
User avatar
scott_s
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 612
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2001 12:59 pm

Re: Strings: 10s v. 11s

Post by scott_s »

kingblud wrote:Hope it's OK to bump up an older post. I was curious if anyone else plays 11s or higher on everything EXCEPT their Ric. I've spent a few days going to war with my Tele and Strat, banging out chords with 11s, wondering why I don't have them on my Ric :)
I've got my Peavey Strat-copy strung up 0.013-0.056. I recently levelled the frets, so the action is nice and low with a minimum of buzz. Easy to play, yet with some nice resistance. 8)

Okay, that's not completely honest: I set it up with 0.012's to loan out to a friend for a gig. It'll get 0.013's (or maybe even heavier) when it comes back to me. MUAHAHAHAHAHA!! :twisted:

- Scott
Folkie
Advanced Member
Posts: 1605
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:23 pm

Re: Strings: 10s v. 11s

Post by Folkie »

I've used a D'Addario .010 round wound set on my 330/12 for years and just recently replaced the .017 G with a wound .020. I've been very happy with the sound and playability (my Rickenbacker has the original factory hi gains). I did buy a round wound Curt Mangan .010 set from Chris Clayton at POTR not too long ago. But I haven't restrung yet.

For the record, I use an Ernie Ball .010 set on my Stratocaster and a D'Addario Chrome (flat wound) .012 set on my Guild X-170. I don't do a lot of bending on the Rickenbacker, but the .010's allow for occasional (mostly half step) bends. I hate changing strings, so I try to bend only when absolutely necessary.

Robert
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker General: by Howard Bishop”