ACTUAL Paul and George argument. / sessions
- johnnysain
- Member
- Posts: 467
- Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2008 8:00 am
Re: ACTUAL Paul and George argument. / sessions
Whatever.....it's my belief that Paul...
1. took the most bunk of anyone in that group.
2. was the most dedicated to keeping them together.
3. carried the group in the final years.
4. had the most talent.
1. took the most bunk of anyone in that group.
2. was the most dedicated to keeping them together.
3. carried the group in the final years.
4. had the most talent.
Rickenbacker player since 1978
Re: ACTUAL Paul and George argument. / sessions
Don't bother looking for it. just go to youtube and search Beatles- winter of discontent.Zurdo wrote:Thank you congerz83, is this Black album available anywhere?congerz83 wrote: The Black Album was a bootleg of all out-takes of the never ending Let It Be album.
H
Re: ACTUAL Paul and George argument. / sessions
I'm in agreement with you.johnnysain wrote:Whatever.....it's my belief that Paul...
1. took the most bunk of anyone in that group.
2. was the most dedicated to keeping them together.
3. carried the group in the final years.
4. had the most talent.
Re: ACTUAL Paul and George argument. / sessions
Long Long Long is a wonderful song.congerz83 wrote:wolfgang wrote:
George knew how to hurt
He did know how to hurt! I wonder how long it took for Paul's ears to stop bleeding while workng on, Love To You, You Like Me too Much, Piggies, Whithin You Without You, Long... Long... Long..., Blue Jay Way, Think For Yourself, etc, etc, etc.....
Shall we continue? George recorded 12 solo albums we can pick apart......
So long and thanks for all the fish!
Re: ACTUAL Paul and George argument. / sessions
no wonder, I can hear George Martin in that song but nowhere else on "Let It Be". Now I understand, thank you.servant wrote:That's because it's more of an Abbey Road-type recording than a Let It Be recording. It was the last song the Threetles recorded before the Beatles broke up (John did not participate).Zurdo wrote:My complaint about Let it Be is the SOUND. it was/is an awful cheesy sound, ... ( I also think an EXCEPTION is "I me mine" ).
Rickenbacker 370-12 1966, Hofner 500/1 1966, Gibson ES-150 DCW 1970,
Vox Viscount 1967, Vox Series 90 1969. Yamaha PSR-9000 Midi Sequencer Arranger 2000
Vox Viscount 1967, Vox Series 90 1969. Yamaha PSR-9000 Midi Sequencer Arranger 2000
-
Peter Lack
- New member
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:36 pm
Re: ACTUAL Paul and George argument. / sessions
Aw, what's with the George-bashing? I'd argue that by 1969, George was writing the best songs of any of them: his contributions to the White Album, Abbey Road and the wealth of songs stashed up for his eventual solo album were astonishing. He'd been sidelined for too long. I appreciate John and Paul asmuch as the next man, but can understand George's frustrations.
Re: ACTUAL Paul and George argument. / sessions
You're welcome. I think the story goes something like: When they found that the Let It Be film was going to include the "heavy waltz" footage of George demo-ing the song, then the Three trying it out, they were in a bind - the song rehearsal was only recorded in mono for the film, and they had never revisited it to record it. They had to reconvene at Abbey Road to put that together for the LP's release.Zurdo wrote:no wonder, I can hear George Martin in that song but nowhere else on "Let It Be". Now I understand, thank you.servant wrote:That's because it's more of an Abbey Road-type recording than a Let It Be recording. It was the last song the Threetles recorded before the Beatles broke up (John did not participate).Zurdo wrote:My complaint about Let it Be is the SOUND. it was/is an awful cheesy sound, ... ( I also think an EXCEPTION is "I me mine" ).
Re: ACTUAL Paul and George argument. / sessions
Add me into that as well.simer4001 wrote:I'm in agreement with you.johnnysain wrote:Whatever.....it's my belief that Paul...
1. took the most bunk of anyone in that group.
2. was the most dedicated to keeping them together.
3. carried the group in the final years.
4. had the most talent.
"Practice does not make perfect. Only perfect practice makes perfect." Vince Lombardi
-
shamustwin
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5287
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 5:00 am
Re: ACTUAL Paul and George argument. / sessions
Amen brother.rickboy88 wrote:Add me into that as well.simer4001 wrote:I'm in agreement with you.johnnysain wrote:Whatever.....it's my belief that Paul...
1. took the most bunk of anyone in that group.
2. was the most dedicated to keeping them together.
3. carried the group in the final years.
4. had the most talent.
Re: ACTUAL Paul and George argument. / sessions
Paul most talented? Nah. I don't buy it. Most passionate and dedicated to being a professional musician, yeah; I buy that.
JimK
JimK
Re: ACTUAL Paul and George argument. / sessions
You left out most innovative. By the way, I love Harrison's solo work, but McCartney is The MAN.johnnysain wrote:Whatever.....it's my belief that Paul...
1. took the most bunk of anyone in that group.
2. was the most dedicated to keeping them together.
3. carried the group in the final years.
4. had the most talent.
Jangle, Chime & Twang.
Re: ACTUAL Paul and George argument. / sessions
+1!simer4001 wrote:I'm in agreement with you.johnnysain wrote:Whatever.....it's my belief that Paul...
1. took the most bunk of anyone in that group.
2. was the most dedicated to keeping them together.
3. carried the group in the final years.
4. had the most talent.
Re: ACTUAL Paul and George argument. / sessions
I think you could make an argument either for or against Paul having the most talent but I thinnk it is much clearer that he was the most consistent in terms of quality of output. His "terrible" work is still head and shoulders above the "terrible" work of the other three.
As for favorites, I go with the Mal Evans response. My favorite is the one I've listened to last. As a slight modification, my second favorite is the one I'm listening to next.
As for favorites, I go with the Mal Evans response. My favorite is the one I've listened to last. As a slight modification, my second favorite is the one I'm listening to next.
Re: ACTUAL Paul and George argument. / sessions
[quote="gibsonlp
Long Long Long is a wonderful song.[/quote]
I can't comment on the song itself but the recording is unlistenable for me. I don't know why but it's like the mixing was designed to keep you from hearing the lyrics and it seems to be noticeably different in sound level from the other tracks. Of all of his Beatles output, I wish he had re-recorded this one.
Long Long Long is a wonderful song.[/quote]
I can't comment on the song itself but the recording is unlistenable for me. I don't know why but it's like the mixing was designed to keep you from hearing the lyrics and it seems to be noticeably different in sound level from the other tracks. Of all of his Beatles output, I wish he had re-recorded this one.
- FretlessOnly
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 1605
- Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 9:00 pm
Re: ACTUAL Paul and George argument. / sessions
I too think that Long, Long, Long is a fantastic song. And as for the recording, consider where the track falls: right after the blistering Helter Skelter and right before Revolution 1. To me, it's no accident that everything was brought down for LLL; being George's tribute to having finally gained a personal understanding of god and sandwiched where it is (rather like a reverse oreo to Dig It and Maggie Mae surrounding Let it Be). The White Album bounces you from wall to wall at times, and I find the entirety of LLL to be finely-executed.
Can we have everything louder than everything else?
