
Why didn't this one sell?
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
Why didn't this one sell?
Last edited by octagon on Thu Aug 26, 2010 3:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Why didn't this one sell?
Click on "0 bids" on the ebay link and you will see there were 4 bids, all cancelled by the seller.
I contacted the seller about this and he said he received an offer he couldn't refuse, cancelled all the bids and ended the auction.
I contacted the seller about this and he said he received an offer he couldn't refuse, cancelled all the bids and ended the auction.
Re: Why didn't this one sell?
Ok,thanks Ron.Is that a rebadged Rickenbacker 425?libratune wrote:Click on "0 bids" on the ebay link and you will see there were 4 bids, all cancelled by the seller.
I contacted the seller about this and he said he received an offer he couldn't refuse, cancelled all the bids and ended the auction.
Re: Why didn't this one sell?
There are a number of threads about Ryder guitars on the Rickenbacker company forum that talk about the differences (or lack of differences) between Ryder guitars and Rickenbacker guitars.octagon wrote:Is that a rebadged Rickenbacker 425?
In one discussion thread there John Hall says (and I hope I am not out of line quoting him here; if so, moderator, please edit or delete), "These guitars were produced under private label, in this case for a music school by that name. These are similar to Rickenbacker instruments but many have subtle difference, not the least of which is a lower level of finish to keep these affordable. They are NOT a Rickenbacker product as such."
Mr. Hall also describes some specific differences that the factory used in the finishing process for guitars that they manufactured under private label. Those differences notwithstanding, other knowledgeable owners have noted a high quality of finish on Ryder guitars.
In addition, just to make generalizations really difficult, Mr. Hall says elsewhere that the factory would occasionally put a "Electro" nameplate on a Rickenbacker if they were under a time crunch. However, I don't know if that is true of the private-label instruments such as Ryder.
Last edited by clementc3 on Thu Aug 26, 2010 4:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Why didn't this one sell?
The seller has an interesting "rant" on the page too in red ink.
- 8mileshigher
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4886
- Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 12:34 pm
Re: Why didn't this one sell?
I think the TRC on these Ryder guitars is somewhat of a detractor
with it's shape and the script writing.
I guess I like the regular Ric TRC too much, to appreciate these private label alternatives.
All in all, the FG finish on that guitar does not look too bad for its age.
I guess I like the regular Ric TRC too much, to appreciate these private label alternatives.
All in all, the FG finish on that guitar does not look too bad for its age.
Re: Why didn't this one sell?
Danotron wrote:The seller has an interesting "rant" on the page too in red ink.
2009 360/6 Fire-Glo 2009 360/12C63 FG 1975 4001 White/BT
Chords mangled, no waiting!
Chords mangled, no waiting!
Re: Why didn't this one sell?
Are the Electros different from the Ryders?clementc3 wrote:There are a number of threads about Ryder guitars on the Rickenbacker company forum that talk about the differences (or lack of differences) between Ryder guitars and Rickenbacker guitars.octagon wrote:Is that a rebadged Rickenbacker 425?
In one discussion thread there John Hall says (and I hope I am not out of line quoting him here; if so, moderator, please edit or delete), "These guitars were produced under private label, in this case for a music school by that name. These are similar to Rickenbacker instruments but many have subtle difference, not the least of which is a lower level of finish to keep these affordable. They are NOT a Rickenbacker product as such."
Mr. Hall also describes some specific differences that the factory used in the finishing process for guitars that they manufactured under private label. Those differences notwithstanding, other knowledgeable owners have noted a high quality of finish on Ryder guitars.
In addition, just to make generalizations really difficult, Mr. Hall says elsewhere that the factory would occasionally put a "Electro" nameplate on a Rickenbacker if they were under a time crunch. However, I don't know if that is true of the private-label instruments such as Ryder.

Re: Why didn't this one sell?
The comparable Electro model would be the ES-17, which usually had a set-neck, though there are also neck-thru Electros. The Ryder in the ebay ad is a neck-thru:
The TRCs look to be about the same shape:
The TRCs look to be about the same shape:
Re: Why didn't this one sell?
Pretty much.




Re: Why didn't this one sell?
Of course, there is the occasional exception:
Re: Why didn't this one sell?
Maybe that is what Rickenbacker gives you as a replacement when you trade in a broken "Electro" TRC.libratune wrote:Of course, there is the occasional exception:
- electrofaro
- Senior Member
- Posts: 3611
- Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:25 pm
Re: Why didn't this one sell?
I hate when that happens! I was tracking a 250 and was mightily confused it was listed under ended when I came home - turns out it was ended early.libratune wrote:Click on "0 bids" on the ebay link and you will see there were 4 bids, all cancelled by the seller.
I contacted the seller about this and he said he received an offer he couldn't refuse, cancelled all the bids and ended the auction.
'67 Fender Coronado II CAB * '17 1963 ES-335 PB * currently rickless
Re: Why didn't this one sell?
Ha, ha. I made arrangement with him to ship to Canada if I won. I figured he had a great offer sent to him.
- jingle_jangle
- RRF Moderator
- Posts: 22679
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
- Contact:
Re: Why didn't this one sell?
Ryder TRCs were about 3/4" shorter than the Electro ones (the name is 2 letters shorter). The Electro ones made using the lap steel metal logo tags were on very early ESs and are rare, although not too pretty.libratune wrote:Of course, there is the occasional exception:
