My quick $.02 is to keep the 4003. I mean, that's what you are considering, right...essentially trading the 4003 for the Laredo? This way you'll have two basses in your arsenal that are more different from each other (and hence, more versatility for you as a bass player).jack1953 wrote:...The main, but not the only, reason I purchased both of these Ricks is because of their resale value. I figured if I'm gonna play bass in gigs twice a week, I might as well play something that will give me a profit after I'm too old to play anymore. (I'm 56 now) Now I know both of the Ricks I have now will do that, but here's what I'm considering. There is a guy on TB who has a sweet 4008 4004L Mapleglo that is flawless for 1490 shipped. I'm wondering if I would benefit (long term) from having the Cheyenne and the Laredo, as opposed to the Cheyenne and the 4003? Opinions? Advice?
Jack
My first thought is that the 4001/4003 series would hold it's value a little better because it is the quintessential Rick bass. The 4004 series is the other guy. The 4001/4003 is the safe bet.
Then again...look at the 4005. 20 years ago you couldn't give one away, and now a nice 70's example is worth around 3 times more than it's 4001 counterpart. So I guess you never know.
But really, the amount of profit or loss that you'll see on 2 new Rick basses over the next 20 years or so is probably not going to be significant enough to fret about (pun intended!) Buy what you like to play/hear.
