Ric Undergoes Major Mod

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
paologregorio
Senior Member
Posts: 6376
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Ric Undergoes Major Mod

Post by paologregorio »

cjj wrote:
johnhall wrote:He's given the "S" designation a new meaning...
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Ditto that x10! :lol: :lol:
User avatar
scott_s
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 612
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2001 12:59 pm

Re: Ric Undergoes Major Mod

Post by scott_s »

Definitely not to my liking, either. But is there anything to this mod that isn't reversible (or at least cover-up-able)?
User avatar
ilan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2903
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 pm

Re: Ric Undergoes Major Mod

Post by ilan »

johnnysain wrote:Yeah, everyone's 4001S just went up 25 cents in value.
I sure hope so!

This "S" MG/BT will remain all original (with the exception of the Bezel...) I honestly can't see how to improve it. It is seriously awesome.

Image
"A Noble Instrument Must Be Nobly Regarded"
User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13200
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Re: Ric Undergoes Major Mod

Post by rickenbrother »

paologregorio wrote:
cjj wrote:
johnhall wrote:He's given the "S" designation a new meaning...
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Ditto that x10! :lol: :lol:
+1!!

I wasn't going to say anything, but call me a Rickensnob, I don't really don't care. Go for it, it's a compliment.
I also think that the white pickguard looks wrong (to me) with all the black hardware and other plastic.
Overall, I don't like it, but It's far from the worst mod I've ever seen. I don't mind the vintage shaped treble pickup surround, but I would have kept the RIC higain in place.
Whether I like it or not, it's his Rick. It is too bad he did this to an S bass, oh well.
The other issue I have with this, is guys that do these mods, then expect to sell these instruments with the cost of the new parts and labor tacked onto the original value of the Rick. Sorry, it doesn't work that way! Rarely are structurally modded Ricks worth the original value of the instrument or more. The 4004L/5 that Paul W is doing for Brian, Dane's 4003CS/8, Tom's 4004L/8 and Paulie's WB'ed 330's might be examples of that.
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
User avatar
bartyclue
Intermediate Member
Posts: 619
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:11 pm

Re: Ric Undergoes Major Mod

Post by bartyclue »

sloop_john_b wrote:
bartyclue wrote:How can you tell an "S" model?
Dot inlays, more contoured body with no body binding, no neck binding.
I love this forum. Thanks for the answer. I have been playing these guitars since my teens without a thought to the history of them.
User avatar
Grey
Advanced Member
Posts: 1659
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:10 pm

Re: Ric Undergoes Major Mod

Post by Grey »

The 'controversy' and rage this has stirred up leaves me sitting here laughing to myself. This is the 3rd time i've seen people flame this guy, first on the official RIC forums, then Talk Bass, and now here. The amount of intolerance for what people want to do with their instrument is staggering, I had no idea there were so many 'elitists' in Ricdom. I've learned alot today.
User avatar
badeggs
Intermediate Member
Posts: 865
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 5:04 am

Re: Ric Undergoes Major Mod

Post by badeggs »

Spike- wrote:The 'controversy' and rage this has stirred up leaves me sitting here laughing to myself. This is the 3rd time i've seen people flame this guy, first on the official RIC forums, then Talk Bass, and now here. The amount of intolerance for what people want to do with their instrument is staggering, I had no idea there were so many 'elitists' in Ricdom. I've learned alot today.
Um, I'm not reading any "rage" or "elitism" in any of these responses, just honest opinions. And no one on here (or any of those other forums) said he couldn't do it, just that he's cutting up a very rare model in order to "improve" it without appreciating what it is...

I agree there's some snobbery on this board from time to time (personally I hate when people write F****r or say "you have to cut the cap in your bass", it's a load of garbage), but this ain't snobbery, just annoyance, and it's justified.
User avatar
s4001
Senior Member
Posts: 3514
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: Ric Undergoes Major Mod

Post by s4001 »

Spike- wrote:The 'controversy' and rage this has stirred up leaves me sitting here laughing to myself. This is the 3rd time i've seen people flame this guy, first on the official RIC forums, then Talk Bass, and now here. The amount of intolerance for what people want to do with their instrument is staggering, I had no idea there were so many 'elitists' in Ricdom. I've learned alot today.
Don't get me wrong, it's his bass and he can do what he wants to it. And I've taken a router to my own 68, so I've no room to talk.

However, you could imagine car enthusiasts grousing about a guy that buys a mint 71 mustang and then takes the motor out, puts a wankel in it, chops the top and scoops the hood.
User avatar
Grey
Advanced Member
Posts: 1659
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:10 pm

Re: Ric Undergoes Major Mod

Post by Grey »

badeggs wrote:Um, I'm not reading any "rage" or "elitism" in any of these responses, just honest opinions. And no one on here (or any of those other forums) said he couldn't do it, just that he's cutting up a very rare model in order to "improve" it without appreciating what it is...
No offense but 3 seperate threads all spanning several pages on 3 seperate forums.... yea. I could pick out specific quotes, i'll admit it hasen't been as harsh here as it is in other places, but my opinion still stands. Also, theres a difference between being an Elitist and being a Snob.

I think he fully appretiates what it is, it just dosen't matter to him. Yea, it's a slightly rare model... so? Are you trying to say that he's "undeserving" of it because it's slightly rare and he's modding it so he can actaully enjoy it? Maybe you're saying that it should belong to someone who appretiates it "properly" and wouldn't touch it with anything more than a polishing cloth. Or maybe im just reading too much into what you're saying.
User avatar
wim
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1486
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 1:37 am

Re: Ric Undergoes Major Mod

Post by wim »

he should have bought a F****r or had the cap bypassed.
:mrgreen:
Off course it's his and he does whatever he wants with it, but like John Hall said, he gave a new meaning to the 'S'.
He'll learn when he sells it.
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: Ric Undergoes Major Mod

Post by cassius987 »

Some people really have gone too far in their comments, but others have just said, "Wow, what a dumb idea," which is as much their right as it is his right to think it was a good idea and do it. It's wrong to suggest every negative comment is elitism or snobbery. On the other hand, I think some of the comments I've read actually are that.

This kind of thing always sucks for me because I never feel quite comfortable on what people inevitably define as the "sides" of the "argument". Ultimately it just makes everybody look foolish, in my experience.
User avatar
nattiep
Advanced Member
Posts: 2389
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 8:33 pm

Re: Ric Undergoes Major Mod

Post by nattiep »

Here's the fun part... who says he's gonna sell it? All you people care about is resale value. Doesn't anybody KEEP a bass anymore? He put this work into getting what he wanted. I'm amazed something like this mod, a personal preference playability mod, gets so much flack over something like Dane does. I'm not trying to attack what Dane does but I think putting a pickguard on a bass that doesn't need one, a third pickup or permanently altering the headstock for an 8 string should be considered just as bad as what this guy did. The guy routed out space for something HE will play. You don't have to like it.

This used to be a great informative community and now all it has are people who insult you if you don't do what they think you should.

Also, with the amount of censorship on here (like the forum censoring the children's version of the four letter word that starts with s) I'm surprised nobody has changed John Hall's comment. We know what he means...
1976 Rickenbacker 4001
2011/05 Fender Standard Fretless Jazz Bass
2005/11 Fender Standard Jazz Bass
User avatar
Paolo
New member
Posts: 23
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 1:16 pm

Re: Ric Undergoes Major Mod

Post by Paolo »

nattiep wrote:Here's the fun part... who says he's gonna sell it? All you people care about is resale value. Doesn't anybody KEEP a bass anymore? He put this work into getting what he wanted. I'm amazed something like this mod, a personal preference playability mod, gets so much flack over something like Dane does. I'm not trying to attack what Dane does but I think putting a pickguard on a bass that doesn't need one, a third pickup or permanently altering the headstock for an 8 string should be considered just as bad as what this guy did. The guy routed out space for something HE will play. You don't have to like it.

This used to be a great informative community and now all it has are people who insult you if you don't do what they think you should.

Also, with the amount of censorship on here (like the forum censoring the children's version of the four letter word that starts with s) I'm surprised nobody has changed John Hall's comment. We know what he means...
I couldn't agree more. There seems to be a hell of a lot of rude,double standard,childish,arrogant & narrow minded purists on this forum. It's a shame.
...and on the 8th day,God created Rickenbacker.
User avatar
johnnysain
Member
Posts: 467
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2008 8:00 am

Re: Ric Undergoes Major Mod

Post by johnnysain »

Paolo wrote: There seems to be a hell of a lot of rude,double standard,childish,arrogant & narrow minded purists on this forum. It's a shame.
Would you consider calling posters "childish" and "arrogant" to be "rude"?

Or is just an opinion you have every right to express?

You stated you couldn't agree more with this, "This used to be a great informative community and now all it has are people who insult you if you don't do what they think you should".

Could that include,...."if you don't say what they think you should"?
Rickenbacker player since 1978
User avatar
Tarrbot
Intermediate Member
Posts: 776
Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 7:13 am

Re: Ric Undergoes Major Mod

Post by Tarrbot »

Paolo wrote:I couldn't agree more. There seems to be a hell of a lot of rude,double standard,childish,arrogant & narrow minded purists on this forum. It's a shame.
I find great irony in your words when taken into context with your sig line...
...and on the 8th day,God created Rickenbacker.
Purist, anyone?

It's almost comedy gold...
Locked

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”