2 Piece vs Neck Thru?

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
heinpete
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1730
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 10:08 pm

Re: 2 Piece vs Neck Thru?

Post by heinpete »

cassius987 wrote:It's not random. It's just like the shedua strip, based on vintage. 4003s made after April 2009 have the two-piece neck because it was determined to be stronger and make basses easier to set up properly. My two-piece neck 4003 doesn't need much tension from the truss rods to stay dead flat.
:o ...it might well influence the resonance of the instrument if the construction is one- or two- or three-piece necks. Specially as the grain in the current two-piece construction runs diametral. Does anybody have a guess/clue/experience? :roll:
RIC_FACTORY
RIC
Posts: 508
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 7:00 pm

Re: 2 Piece vs Neck Thru?

Post by RIC_FACTORY »

jack1953 wrote:One of the guys in other forums was asking if his bass guitars were 2 piece necks or neck thrus? One is a 2010 June 4003. The other is a 2009 September 4003. I said I would post it over here where the experts resided! :wink: Also if there is an advantage/disadvantage either way.
Jack
Basses built since the end of April 2009 have all had two piece necks. All 4003's are neck-throughs.
User avatar
iamthebassman
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2415
Joined: Tue May 28, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: 2 Piece vs Neck Thru?

Post by iamthebassman »

bassduke49 wrote:4000 and 4001S basses from about 1972 to 1980 had set necks slotted into slab bodies.
Just FYI, my '82 4001S-LH is set-neck.
"Top 10 Best Bass Players" Austin Music Poll 2014, 2013, 2012, 2011, 2010
User avatar
BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS
Professional Player
Posts: 1857
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:58 pm

Re: 2 Piece vs Neck Thru?

Post by BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS »

as was my jetglo june '81 4001s.
mad_phingers
New member
Posts: 63
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 10:53 pm

Re: 2 Piece vs Neck Thru?

Post by mad_phingers »

Will all current 4004s have 2 piece necks as well?
RIC_FACTORY
RIC
Posts: 508
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 7:00 pm

Re: 2 Piece vs Neck Thru?

Post by RIC_FACTORY »

Yes. All neck-through instruments are currently produced with two piece necks.
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: 2 Piece vs Neck Thru?

Post by cassius987 »

mad_phingers wrote:Will all current 4004s have 2 piece necks as well?
I've already run across three or four two-piece neck 4004s at the nearby RIC dealer.
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: 2 Piece vs Neck Thru?

Post by johnallg »

This can't get any clearer. Can we make it a sticky?
User avatar
libratune
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 4255
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2002 9:06 am
Contact:

Re: 2 Piece vs Neck Thru?

Post by libratune »

cassius987 wrote:It's not random. It's just like the shedua strip, based on vintage. 4003s made after April 2009 have the two-piece neck because it was determined to be stronger and make basses easier to set up properly. My two-piece neck 4003 doesn't need much tension from the truss rods to stay dead flat.
That sounds reasonable, but is that the official word from RIC? Moving to 2-pc because it is stronger is a very positive motivation and certainly player-oriented, but I have not investigated it and am just wondering. Does 2-pc require extra steps in the construction process? Was the switch from decades of bad experiences with one-piece necks? And what are the possible downsides for the player (if any) of the 2 pc construction?
RIC_FACTORY
RIC
Posts: 508
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 7:00 pm

Re: 2 Piece vs Neck Thru?

Post by RIC_FACTORY »

That sounds reasonable, but is that the official word from RIC? Moving to 2-pc because it is stronger is a very positive motivation and certainly player-oriented, but I have not investigated it and am just wondering. Does 2-pc require extra steps in the construction process? Was the switch from decades of bad experiences with one-piece necks? And what are the possible downsides for the player (if any) of the 2 pc construction?
The two piece necks do require additional steps in production. The lumber must be cut to length, planed to thickness, glue edges jointed, sides machine sanded, then finally the two pieces are glued up in our clamp racks.

Before it was just cut to length, then throw it on the table saw to split, and you're done.

While we didn't have any serious problem that necesitated the switch to two-piece, there has been a marked decrease in the number of warped necks we see at final setup (and fewer RA's).
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: 2 Piece vs Neck Thru?

Post by aceonbass »

I have two relatively new 4004's with two piece necks. They are definitely stronger, requiring less tension on the rods. They also feel thinner than my previous three 4004's, which makes them easier to play as four strings...something my 4004L MID is no longer and my newest 4004Cii won't be for long :wink:
By the way, I've also noticed that the end of the fretboard on my newer ones is 1/16" narrower than the '03 4004Cii fretless 5-string I just sold.
User avatar
libratune
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 4255
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2002 9:06 am
Contact:

Re: 2 Piece vs Neck Thru?

Post by libratune »

RIC_FACTORY wrote:
That sounds reasonable, but is that the official word from RIC? Moving to 2-pc because it is stronger is a very positive motivation and certainly player-oriented, but I have not investigated it and am just wondering. Does 2-pc require extra steps in the construction process? Was the switch from decades of bad experiences with one-piece necks? And what are the possible downsides for the player (if any) of the 2 pc construction?
The two piece necks do require additional steps in production. The lumber must be cut to length, planed to thickness, glue edges jointed, sides machine sanded, then finally the two pieces are glued up in our clamp racks.

Before it was just cut to length, then throw it on the table saw to split, and you're done.

While we didn't have any serious problem that necesitated the switch to two-piece, there has been a marked decrease in the number of warped necks we see at final setup (and fewer RA's).
Ben, thanks for the reply. Much appreciated.
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: 2 Piece vs Neck Thru?

Post by cassius987 »

RIC_FACTORY wrote:While we didn't have any serious problem that necesitated the switch to two-piece, there has been a marked decrease in the number of warped necks we see at final setup (and fewer RA's).
That's exactly what I expected to hear after my recent RA garnered me a replaced body with a two-piece neck... it is obviously straighter and more stable and requires no babying, and I doubt I'll be taking it to my luthier any time soon. My 4003FL (my favorite by the way) has a thin one-piece neck and feels like the exact opposite, quite a diva sometimes! But I love it all the same.
heinpete wrote:
cassius987 wrote:It's not random. It's just like the shedua strip, based on vintage. 4003s made after April 2009 have the two-piece neck because it was determined to be stronger and make basses easier to set up properly. My two-piece neck 4003 doesn't need much tension from the truss rods to stay dead flat.
:o ...it might well influence the resonance of the instrument if the construction is one- or two- or three-piece necks. Specially as the grain in the current two-piece construction runs diametral. Does anybody have a guess/clue/experience? :roll:
My 4003 with a two-piece neck sounds perhaps a bit punchier than my 4003 with a one-piece neck... otherwise very similar in terms of sound. Now, it is worth noting that I think my 4003 with a two-piece neck has amazing sustain whereas the one-piece is just normal; I know you may roll your eyes but their truly are no dead spots, not even "wimpy" spots, on my two-piece neck bass. It's all loud, proud, and even.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”